1
00:00:01,087 --> 00:00:05,272
There is something about physics

2
00:00:05,296 --> 00:00:09,296
that has been really bothering me
since I was a little kid.

3
00:00:11,010 --> 00:00:12,819
And it's related to a question

4
00:00:12,843 --> 00:00:16,087
that scientists have been asking
for almost 100 years,

5
00:00:16,111 --> 00:00:17,280
with no answer.

6
00:00:19,108 --> 00:00:22,118
How do the smallest things in nature,

7
00:00:22,142 --> 00:00:24,295
the particles of the quantum world,

8
00:00:24,319 --> 00:00:27,350
match up with the largest
things in nature --

9
00:00:27,374 --> 00:00:30,621
planets and stars and galaxies
held together by gravity?

10
00:00:31,250 --> 00:00:34,023
As a kid, I would puzzle
over questions just like this.

11
00:00:34,047 --> 00:00:36,939
I would fiddle around
with microscopes and electromagnets,

12
00:00:36,963 --> 00:00:39,158
and I would read
about the forces of the small

13
00:00:39,182 --> 00:00:40,516
and about quantum mechanics

14
00:00:40,540 --> 00:00:44,104
and I would marvel at how well
that description matched up

15
00:00:44,128 --> 00:00:45,298
to our observation.

16
00:00:46,220 --> 00:00:47,803
Then I would look at the stars,

17
00:00:47,827 --> 00:00:50,351
and I would read about how well
we understand gravity,

18
00:00:50,375 --> 00:00:53,725
and I would think surely,
there must be some elegant way

19
00:00:53,749 --> 00:00:56,394
that these two systems match up.

20
00:00:57,021 --> 00:00:58,422
But there's not.

21
00:00:59,673 --> 00:01:00,833
And the books would say,

22
00:01:00,857 --> 00:01:04,040
yeah, we understand a lot
about these two realms separately,

23
00:01:04,064 --> 00:01:06,674
but when we try to link
them mathematically,

24
00:01:06,698 --> 00:01:08,028
everything breaks.

25
00:01:08,674 --> 00:01:09,984
And for 100 years,

26
00:01:10,008 --> 00:01:15,036
none of our ideas as to how to solve
this basically physics disaster,

27
00:01:15,060 --> 00:01:16,874
has ever been supported by evidence.

28
00:01:18,271 --> 00:01:19,925
And to little old me --

29
00:01:19,949 --> 00:01:21,759
little, curious, skeptical James --

30
00:01:21,783 --> 00:01:24,651
this was a supremely unsatisfying answer.

31
00:01:26,011 --> 00:01:28,244
So, I'm still a skeptical little kid.

32
00:01:28,268 --> 00:01:32,078
Flash-forward now
to December of 2015,

33
00:01:33,029 --> 00:01:35,503
when I found myself smack in the middle

34
00:01:35,527 --> 00:01:38,467
of the physics world
being flipped on its head.

35
00:01:39,999 --> 00:01:43,319
It all started when we at CERN
saw something intriguing in our data:

36
00:01:43,343 --> 00:01:45,617
a hint of a new particle,

37
00:01:45,641 --> 00:01:49,857
an inkling of a possibly extraordinary
answer to this question.

38
00:01:51,777 --> 00:01:53,904
So I'm still a skeptical
little kid, I think,

39
00:01:53,928 --> 00:01:56,061
but I'm also now a particle hunter.

40
00:01:56,085 --> 00:01:59,548
I am a physicist at CERN's
Large Hadron Collider,

41
00:01:59,572 --> 00:02:03,043
the largest science
experiment ever mounted.

42
00:02:03,877 --> 00:02:07,412
It's a 27-kilometer tunnel
on the border of France and Switzerland

43
00:02:07,436 --> 00:02:09,286
buried 100 meters underground.

44
00:02:09,310 --> 00:02:10,464
And in this tunnel,

45
00:02:10,488 --> 00:02:14,441
we use superconducting magnets
colder than outer space

46
00:02:14,465 --> 00:02:17,526
to accelerate protons
to almost the speed of light

47
00:02:17,550 --> 00:02:21,427
and slam them into each other
millions of times per second,

48
00:02:21,451 --> 00:02:24,277
collecting the debris of these collisions

49
00:02:24,301 --> 00:02:28,272
to search for new, undiscovered
fundamental particles.

50
00:02:28,727 --> 00:02:31,191
Its design and construction
took decades of work

51
00:02:31,215 --> 00:02:34,247
by thousands of physicists
from around the globe,

52
00:02:34,271 --> 00:02:36,812
and in the summer of 2015,

53
00:02:36,836 --> 00:02:40,260
we had been working tirelessly
to switch on the LHC

54
00:02:40,284 --> 00:02:44,751
at the highest energy that humans
have ever used in a collider experiment.

55
00:02:45,735 --> 00:02:48,258
Now, higher energy is important

56
00:02:48,282 --> 00:02:50,469
because for particles,
there is an equivalence

57
00:02:50,493 --> 00:02:52,694
between energy and particle mass,

58
00:02:52,718 --> 00:02:55,179
and mass is just a number
put there by nature.

59
00:02:56,068 --> 00:02:57,386
To discover new particles,

60
00:02:57,410 --> 00:02:59,532
we need to reach these bigger numbers.

61
00:02:59,556 --> 00:03:02,810
And to do that, we have to build
a bigger, higher energy collider,

62
00:03:02,834 --> 00:03:05,399
and the biggest, highest
energy collider in the world

63
00:03:05,423 --> 00:03:06,889
is the Large Hadron Collider.

64
00:03:08,271 --> 00:03:13,170
And then, we collide protons
quadrillions of times,

65
00:03:13,194 --> 00:03:17,478
and we collect this data very slowly,
over months and months.

66
00:03:18,813 --> 00:03:23,148
And then new particles might show up
in our data as bumps --

67
00:03:23,172 --> 00:03:25,617
slight deviations from what you expect,

68
00:03:25,641 --> 00:03:29,608
little clusters of data points
that make a smooth line not so smooth.

69
00:03:30,379 --> 00:03:32,100
For example, this bump,

70
00:03:33,010 --> 00:03:35,543
after months of data-taking in 2012,

71
00:03:35,567 --> 00:03:37,696
led to the discovery
of the Higgs particle --

72
00:03:37,720 --> 00:03:38,925
the Higgs boson --

73
00:03:38,949 --> 00:03:42,314
and to a Nobel Prize
for the confirmation of its existence.

74
00:03:43,972 --> 00:03:47,530
This jump up in energy in 2015

75
00:03:48,628 --> 00:03:51,920
represented the best chance
that we as a species had ever had

76
00:03:51,944 --> 00:03:53,421
of discovering new particles --

77
00:03:53,445 --> 00:03:55,557
new answers to these
long-standing questions,

78
00:03:55,581 --> 00:03:58,678
because it was almost
twice as much energy as we used

79
00:03:58,702 --> 00:04:00,624
when we discovered the Higgs boson.

80
00:04:00,648 --> 00:04:04,389
Many of my colleagues had been working
their entire careers for this moment,

81
00:04:04,413 --> 00:04:06,489
and frankly, to little curious me,

82
00:04:06,513 --> 00:04:09,423
this was the moment
I'd been waiting for my entire life.

83
00:04:09,447 --> 00:04:11,178
So 2015 was go time.

84
00:04:12,654 --> 00:04:14,864
So June 2015,

85
00:04:15,722 --> 00:04:18,381
the LHC is switched back on.

86
00:04:19,040 --> 00:04:21,917
My colleagues and I held our breath
and bit our fingernails,

87
00:04:21,941 --> 00:04:24,452
and then finally we saw
the first proton collisions

88
00:04:24,476 --> 00:04:26,432
at this highest energy ever.

89
00:04:26,456 --> 00:04:28,532
Applause, champagne, celebration.

90
00:04:28,556 --> 00:04:32,152
This was a milestone for science,

91
00:04:32,176 --> 00:04:36,798
and we had no idea what we would find
in this brand-new data.

92
00:04:39,990 --> 00:04:42,168
And then a few weeks later,
we found a bump.

93
00:04:44,192 --> 00:04:45,868
It wasn't a very big bump,

94
00:04:46,952 --> 00:04:49,464
but it was big enough to make
you raise your eyebrow.

95
00:04:49,488 --> 00:04:51,739
But on a scale of one to 10
for eyebrow raises,

96
00:04:51,763 --> 00:04:54,373
if 10 indicates that you've
discovered a new particle,

97
00:04:54,397 --> 00:04:56,124
this eyebrow raise is about a four.

98
00:04:56,148 --> 00:04:57,298
(Laughter)

99
00:04:58,432 --> 00:05:03,643
I spent hours, days, weeks
in secret meetings,

100
00:05:03,667 --> 00:05:06,027
arguing with my colleagues
over this little bump,

101
00:05:06,051 --> 00:05:09,287
poking and prodding it with our most
ruthless experimental sticks

102
00:05:09,311 --> 00:05:11,288
to see if it would withstand scrutiny.

103
00:05:11,988 --> 00:05:15,449
But even after months
of working feverishly --

104
00:05:15,473 --> 00:05:17,905
sleeping in our offices
and not going home,

105
00:05:17,929 --> 00:05:20,006
candy bars for dinner,

106
00:05:20,030 --> 00:05:21,600
coffee by the bucketful --

107
00:05:21,624 --> 00:05:25,867
physicists are machines
for turning coffee into diagrams --

108
00:05:25,891 --> 00:05:27,290
(Laughter)

109
00:05:27,314 --> 00:05:29,850
This little bump would not go away.

110
00:05:30,704 --> 00:05:32,842
So after a few months,

111
00:05:32,866 --> 00:05:36,576
we presented our little bump to the world
with a very clear message:

112
00:05:37,457 --> 00:05:40,168
this little bump is interesting
but it's not definitive,

113
00:05:40,192 --> 00:05:43,521
so let's keep an eye on it
as we take more data.

114
00:05:43,872 --> 00:05:46,163
So we were trying to be
extremely cool about it.

115
00:05:47,463 --> 00:05:49,651
And the world ran with it anyway.

116
00:05:50,383 --> 00:05:52,015
The news loved it.

117
00:05:52,735 --> 00:05:55,290
People said it reminded
them of the little bump

118
00:05:55,314 --> 00:05:58,737
that was shown on the way
toward the Higgs boson discovery.

119
00:05:58,761 --> 00:06:01,889
Better than that,
my theorist colleagues --

120
00:06:02,548 --> 00:06:04,865
I love my theorist colleagues --

121
00:06:04,889 --> 00:06:08,501
my theorist colleagues wrote
500 papers about this little bump.

122
00:06:08,525 --> 00:06:09,980
(Laughter)

123
00:06:10,574 --> 00:06:14,540
The world of particle physics
had been flipped on its head.

124
00:06:15,745 --> 00:06:19,987
But what was it about this particular bump

125
00:06:20,011 --> 00:06:24,101
that caused thousands of physicists
to collectively lose their cool?

126
00:06:25,596 --> 00:06:27,032
This little bump was unique.

127
00:06:28,198 --> 00:06:29,567
This little bump indicated

128
00:06:29,591 --> 00:06:32,613
that we were seeing an unexpectedly
large number of collisions

129
00:06:32,637 --> 00:06:35,968
whose debris consisted
of only two photons,

130
00:06:35,992 --> 00:06:37,236
two particles of light.

131
00:06:37,260 --> 00:06:38,497
And that's rare.

132
00:06:39,069 --> 00:06:41,689
Particle collisions are not
like automobile collisions.

133
00:06:41,713 --> 00:06:43,232
They have different rules.

134
00:06:43,256 --> 00:06:45,906
When two particles collide
at almost the speed of light,

135
00:06:45,930 --> 00:06:47,351
the quantum world takes over.

136
00:06:47,375 --> 00:06:48,635
And in the quantum world,

137
00:06:48,659 --> 00:06:51,852
these two particles
can briefly create a new particle

138
00:06:51,876 --> 00:06:54,656
that lives for a tiny fraction of a second

139
00:06:54,680 --> 00:06:57,561
before splitting into other particles
that hit our detector.

140
00:06:57,585 --> 00:07:00,990
Imagine a car collision
where the two cars vanish upon impact,

141
00:07:01,014 --> 00:07:03,283
a bicycle appears in their place --

142
00:07:03,307 --> 00:07:04,378
(Laughter)

143
00:07:04,402 --> 00:07:06,863
And then that bicycle explodes
into two skateboards,

144
00:07:06,887 --> 00:07:08,068
which hit our detector.

145
00:07:08,092 --> 00:07:09,471
(Laughter)

146
00:07:09,495 --> 00:07:11,448
Hopefully, not literally.

147
00:07:11,472 --> 00:07:12,814
They're very expensive.

148
00:07:14,191 --> 00:07:17,939
Events where only two photons
hit out detector are very rare.

149
00:07:17,963 --> 00:07:21,685
And because of the special
quantum properties of photons,

150
00:07:21,709 --> 00:07:25,497
there's a very small number
of possible new particles --

151
00:07:25,521 --> 00:07:27,018
these mythical bicycles --

152
00:07:27,042 --> 00:07:29,285
that can give birth to only two photons.

153
00:07:29,812 --> 00:07:32,648
But one of these options is huge,

154
00:07:32,672 --> 00:07:35,508
and it has to do with
that long-standing question

155
00:07:35,532 --> 00:07:38,054
that bothered me as a tiny little kid,

156
00:07:38,078 --> 00:07:39,438
about gravity.

157
00:07:41,946 --> 00:07:44,618
Gravity may seem super strong to you,

158
00:07:44,642 --> 00:07:48,742
but it's actually crazily weak
compared to the other forces of nature.

159
00:07:48,766 --> 00:07:51,397
I can briefly beat gravity when I jump,

160
00:07:52,390 --> 00:07:55,233
but I can't pick a proton out of my hand.

161
00:07:56,463 --> 00:07:59,679
The strength of gravity compared
to the other forces of nature?

162
00:08:00,480 --> 00:08:02,670
It's 10 to the minus 39.

163
00:08:02,694 --> 00:08:05,231
That's a decimal with 39 zeros after it.

164
00:08:05,255 --> 00:08:06,412
Worse than that,

165
00:08:06,436 --> 00:08:09,463
all of the other known forces of nature
are perfectly described

166
00:08:09,487 --> 00:08:11,524
by this thing we call the Standard Model,

167
00:08:11,548 --> 00:08:14,983
which is our current best description
of nature at its smallest scales,

168
00:08:15,007 --> 00:08:16,163
and quite frankly,

169
00:08:16,187 --> 00:08:20,364
one of the most successful
achievements of humankind --

170
00:08:20,388 --> 00:08:24,400
except for gravity, which is absent
from the Standard Model.

171
00:08:24,424 --> 00:08:25,574
It's crazy.

172
00:08:26,046 --> 00:08:29,146
It's almost as though most
of gravity has gone missing.

173
00:08:30,394 --> 00:08:32,061
We feel a little bit of it,

174
00:08:32,085 --> 00:08:33,761
but where's the rest of it?

175
00:08:33,785 --> 00:08:35,067
No one knows.

176
00:08:36,003 --> 00:08:40,406
But one theoretical explanation
proposes a wild solution.

177
00:08:42,120 --> 00:08:43,459
You and I --

178
00:08:43,483 --> 00:08:45,061
even you in the back --

179
00:08:45,085 --> 00:08:47,230
we live in three dimensions of space.

180
00:08:47,254 --> 00:08:49,811
I hope that's a
non-controversial statement.

181
00:08:49,835 --> 00:08:51,664
(Laughter)

182
00:08:51,688 --> 00:08:55,126
All of the known particles also live
in three dimensions of space.

183
00:08:55,150 --> 00:08:57,340
In fact, a particle is just another name

184
00:08:57,364 --> 00:09:00,373
for an excitation
in a three-dimensional field;

185
00:09:00,397 --> 00:09:02,317
a localized wobbling in space.

186
00:09:03,288 --> 00:09:06,817
More importantly, all the math
that we use to describe all this stuff

187
00:09:06,841 --> 00:09:09,914
assumes that there are only
three dimensions of space.

188
00:09:09,938 --> 00:09:13,319
But math is math, and we can play
around with our math however we want.

189
00:09:13,343 --> 00:09:16,509
And people have been playing around
with extra dimensions of space

190
00:09:16,533 --> 00:09:17,688
for a very long time,

191
00:09:17,712 --> 00:09:20,297
but it's always been an abstract
mathematical concept.

192
00:09:20,321 --> 00:09:23,493
I mean, just look around you --
you at the back, look around --

193
00:09:23,517 --> 00:09:25,798
there's clearly only
three dimensions of space.

194
00:09:26,954 --> 00:09:28,513
But what if that's not true?

195
00:09:30,109 --> 00:09:36,364
What if the missing gravity is leaking
into an extra-spatial dimension

196
00:09:36,388 --> 00:09:38,344
that's invisible to you and I?

197
00:09:39,355 --> 00:09:42,449
What if gravity is just as strong
as the other forces

198
00:09:42,473 --> 00:09:45,614
if you were to view it in this
extra-spatial dimension,

199
00:09:45,638 --> 00:09:48,538
and what you and I experience
is a tiny slice of gravity

200
00:09:48,562 --> 00:09:50,459
make it seem very weak?

201
00:09:52,158 --> 00:09:53,333
If this were true,

202
00:09:53,357 --> 00:09:56,105
we would have to expand
our Standard Model of particles

203
00:09:56,129 --> 00:10:00,215
to include an extra particle,
a hyperdimensional particle of gravity,

204
00:10:00,239 --> 00:10:03,234
a special graviton that lives
in extra-spatial dimensions.

205
00:10:03,258 --> 00:10:04,723
I see the looks on your faces.

206
00:10:04,747 --> 00:10:06,566
You should be asking me the question,

207
00:10:06,590 --> 00:10:10,234
"How in the world are we going to test
this crazy, science fiction idea,

208
00:10:10,258 --> 00:10:12,749
stuck as we are in three dimensions?"

209
00:10:12,773 --> 00:10:14,055
The way we always do,

210
00:10:14,079 --> 00:10:16,218
by slamming together two protons --

211
00:10:16,242 --> 00:10:17,394
(Laughter)

212
00:10:17,418 --> 00:10:19,982
Hard enough that
the collision reverberates

213
00:10:20,006 --> 00:10:22,697
into any extra-spatial dimensions
that might be there,

214
00:10:22,721 --> 00:10:25,320
momentarily creating
this hyperdimensional graviton

215
00:10:25,344 --> 00:10:29,724
that then snaps back
into the three dimensions of the LHC

216
00:10:29,748 --> 00:10:31,570
and spits off two photons,

217
00:10:32,278 --> 00:10:33,616
two particles of light.

218
00:10:35,417 --> 00:10:38,327
And this hypothetical,
extra-dimensional graviton

219
00:10:38,351 --> 00:10:42,058
is one of the only possible,
hypothetical new particles

220
00:10:42,082 --> 00:10:44,217
that has the special quantum properties

221
00:10:44,241 --> 00:10:48,477
that could give birth to our little,
two-photon bump.

222
00:10:50,000 --> 00:10:55,820
So, the possibility of explaining
the mysteries of gravity

223
00:10:55,844 --> 00:10:59,342
and of discovering extra
dimensions of space --

224
00:10:59,366 --> 00:11:00,958
perhaps now you get a sense

225
00:11:00,982 --> 00:11:05,106
as to why thousands of physics geeks
collectively lost their cool

226
00:11:05,130 --> 00:11:07,012
over our little, two-photon bump.

227
00:11:07,036 --> 00:11:09,936
A discovery of this type
would rewrite the textbooks.

228
00:11:10,739 --> 00:11:11,891
But remember,

229
00:11:11,915 --> 00:11:13,639
the message from us experimentalists

230
00:11:13,663 --> 00:11:15,902
that actually were doing
this work at the time,

231
00:11:15,926 --> 00:11:17,080
was very clear:

232
00:11:17,104 --> 00:11:18,278
we need more data.

233
00:11:18,302 --> 00:11:19,821
With more data,

234
00:11:19,845 --> 00:11:23,869
the little bump will either turn into
a nice, crisp Nobel Prize --

235
00:11:23,893 --> 00:11:25,653
(Laughter)

236
00:11:25,677 --> 00:11:28,641
Or the extra data will fill in
the space around the bump

237
00:11:28,665 --> 00:11:30,531
and turn it into a nice, smooth line.

238
00:11:31,515 --> 00:11:32,733
So we took more data,

239
00:11:32,757 --> 00:11:35,334
and with five times the data,
several months later,

240
00:11:35,358 --> 00:11:37,048
our little bump

241
00:11:37,072 --> 00:11:39,420
turned into a smooth line.

242
00:11:43,217 --> 00:11:46,701
The news reported on a "huge
disappointment," on "faded hopes,"

243
00:11:46,725 --> 00:11:49,235
and on particle physicists "being sad."

244
00:11:49,259 --> 00:11:51,070
Given the tone of the coverage,

245
00:11:51,094 --> 00:11:54,582
you'd think that we had decided
to shut down the LHC and go home.

246
00:11:54,606 --> 00:11:55,756
(Laughter)

247
00:11:56,628 --> 00:11:58,231
But that's not what we did.

248
00:12:01,057 --> 00:12:03,071
But why not?

249
00:12:04,475 --> 00:12:07,320
I mean, if I didn't discover
a particle -- and I didn't --

250
00:12:08,209 --> 00:12:11,238
if I didn't discover a particle,
why am I here talking to you?

251
00:12:11,262 --> 00:12:13,699
Why didn't I just hang my head in shame

252
00:12:13,723 --> 00:12:14,947
and go home?

253
00:12:19,169 --> 00:12:22,520
Particle physicists are explorers.

254
00:12:23,421 --> 00:12:26,373
And very much of what we do
is cartography.

255
00:12:27,468 --> 00:12:30,320
Let me put it this way: forget
about the LHC for a second.

256
00:12:30,344 --> 00:12:33,726
Imagine you are a space explorer
arriving at a distant planet,

257
00:12:33,750 --> 00:12:35,075
searching for aliens.

258
00:12:35,099 --> 00:12:36,621
What is your first task?

259
00:12:37,931 --> 00:12:41,007
To immediately orbit the planet,
land, take a quick look around

260
00:12:41,031 --> 00:12:42,917
for any big, obvious signs of life,

261
00:12:42,941 --> 00:12:44,760
and report back to home base.

262
00:12:44,784 --> 00:12:46,408
That's the stage we're at now.

263
00:12:47,269 --> 00:12:48,756
We took a first look at the LHC

264
00:12:48,780 --> 00:12:51,064
for any new, big,
obvious-to-spot particles,

265
00:12:51,088 --> 00:12:53,038
and we can report that there are none.

266
00:12:53,631 --> 00:12:56,304
We saw a weird-looking alien bump
on a distant mountain,

267
00:12:56,328 --> 00:12:58,498
but once we got closer,
we saw it was a rock.

268
00:12:58,816 --> 00:13:01,456
But then what do we do?
Do we just give up and fly away?

269
00:13:01,480 --> 00:13:02,767
Absolutely not;

270
00:13:02,791 --> 00:13:05,096
we would be terrible scientists if we did.

271
00:13:05,120 --> 00:13:08,733
No, we spend the next couple
of decades exploring,

272
00:13:08,757 --> 00:13:10,237
mapping out the territory,

273
00:13:10,261 --> 00:13:12,626
sifting through the sand
with a fine instrument,

274
00:13:12,650 --> 00:13:14,108
peeking under every stone,

275
00:13:14,132 --> 00:13:15,686
drilling under the surface.

276
00:13:16,106 --> 00:13:18,699
New particles can either
show up immediately

277
00:13:18,723 --> 00:13:20,856
as big, obvious-to-spot bumps,

278
00:13:20,880 --> 00:13:24,821
or they can only reveal themselves
after years of data taking.

279
00:13:26,103 --> 00:13:30,513
Humanity has just begun its exploration
at the LHC at this big high energy,

280
00:13:30,537 --> 00:13:32,328
and we have much searching to do.

281
00:13:32,352 --> 00:13:38,177
But what if, even after 10 or 20 years,
we still find no new particles?

282
00:13:39,053 --> 00:13:40,748
We build a bigger machine.

283
00:13:40,772 --> 00:13:42,346
(Laughter)

284
00:13:42,370 --> 00:13:44,060
We search at higher energies.

285
00:13:44,476 --> 00:13:46,046
We search at higher energies.

286
00:13:46,946 --> 00:13:49,999
Planning is already underway
for a 100-kilometer tunnel

287
00:13:50,612 --> 00:13:53,588
that will collide particles
at 10 times the energy of the LHC.

288
00:13:53,612 --> 00:13:55,949
We don't decide where
nature places new particles.

289
00:13:56,366 --> 00:13:58,012
We only decide to keep exploring.

290
00:13:58,036 --> 00:14:00,594
But what if, even after
a 100-kilometer tunnel

291
00:14:00,618 --> 00:14:02,478
or a 500-kilometer tunnel

292
00:14:02,502 --> 00:14:05,343
or a 10,000-kilometer
collider floating in space

293
00:14:05,367 --> 00:14:06,945
between the Earth and the Moon,

294
00:14:06,969 --> 00:14:10,031
we still find no new particles?

295
00:14:11,597 --> 00:14:14,291
Then perhaps we're doing
particle physics wrong.

296
00:14:14,315 --> 00:14:16,106
(Laughter)

297
00:14:16,130 --> 00:14:18,087
Perhaps we need to rethink things.

298
00:14:19,127 --> 00:14:22,389
Maybe we need more resources,
technology, expertise

299
00:14:22,413 --> 00:14:23,921
than what we currently have.

300
00:14:24,610 --> 00:14:27,951
We already use artificial intelligence
and machine learning techniques

301
00:14:27,975 --> 00:14:29,128
in parts of the LHC,

302
00:14:29,152 --> 00:14:31,558
but imagine designing
a particle physics experiment

303
00:14:31,582 --> 00:14:33,251
using such sophisticated algorithms

304
00:14:33,275 --> 00:14:36,443
that it could teach itself to discover
a hyperdimensional graviton.

305
00:14:36,467 --> 00:14:37,624
But what if?

306
00:14:37,648 --> 00:14:39,093
What if the ultimate question:

307
00:14:39,117 --> 00:14:42,590
What if even artificial intelligence
can't help us answer our questions?

308
00:14:42,614 --> 00:14:44,725
What if these open questions,
for centuries,

309
00:14:44,749 --> 00:14:47,418
are destined to be unanswered
for the foreseeable future?

310
00:14:47,442 --> 00:14:50,371
What if the stuff that's bothered me
since I was a little kid

311
00:14:50,395 --> 00:14:52,918
is destined to be unanswered
in my lifetime?

312
00:14:54,395 --> 00:14:55,551
Then that ...

313
00:14:56,282 --> 00:14:58,376
will be even more fascinating.

314
00:15:00,144 --> 00:15:03,369
We will be forced to think
in completely new ways.

315
00:15:04,361 --> 00:15:06,419
We'll have to go back to our assumptions,

316
00:15:06,443 --> 00:15:08,782
and determine if there was
a flaw somewhere.

317
00:15:09,401 --> 00:15:12,796
And we'll need to encourage more people
to join us in studying science

318
00:15:12,820 --> 00:15:15,882
since we need fresh eyes
on these century-old problems.

319
00:15:15,906 --> 00:15:19,040
I don't have the answers,
and I'm still searching for them.

320
00:15:19,064 --> 00:15:21,393
But someone -- maybe
she's in school right now,

321
00:15:21,417 --> 00:15:23,101
maybe she's not even born yet --

322
00:15:23,783 --> 00:15:26,916
could eventually guide us to see physics
in a completely new way,

323
00:15:26,940 --> 00:15:31,208
and to point out that perhaps
we're just asking the wrong questions.

324
00:15:32,112 --> 00:15:34,522
Which would not be the end of physics,

325
00:15:34,546 --> 00:15:35,952
but a novel beginning.

326
00:15:37,204 --> 00:15:38,354
Thank you.

327
00:15:38,378 --> 00:15:40,919
(Applause)