1 00:00:02,290 --> 00:00:05,945 ♪ [music] ♪ 2 00:00:14,295 --> 00:00:15,400 - [Professor Tyler Cowen] In the previous video, 3 00:00:15,400 --> 00:00:18,280 we introduced the ideas of asymmetric information, 4 00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:21,280 and adverse selection and we applied those ideas 5 00:00:21,280 --> 00:00:22,679 to the used car market. 6 00:00:22,880 --> 00:00:25,040 Let's take those same basic concepts, 7 00:00:25,040 --> 00:00:28,630 and build a basic model of health insurance. 8 00:00:28,630 --> 00:00:31,420 Suppose that potential health insurance consumers 9 00:00:31,420 --> 00:00:33,660 come in a range of states of health. 10 00:00:33,660 --> 00:00:35,680 For instance, the least healthy people 11 00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:38,920 might cost about $30,000 a year. 12 00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:40,610 That's these folks here. 13 00:00:40,610 --> 00:00:43,980 The most healthy might cost nothing in healthcare. 14 00:00:43,980 --> 00:00:46,120 That's these folks over here. 15 00:00:46,120 --> 00:00:48,540 Now consumers know this information, 16 00:00:48,540 --> 00:00:51,180 but by assumption, insurers don't. 17 00:00:51,180 --> 00:00:53,160 From the insurer point of view, 18 00:00:53,160 --> 00:00:56,010 everyone is of the same average health. 19 00:00:56,010 --> 00:00:58,964 Here again, we have asymmetric information. 20 00:00:59,110 --> 00:01:01,460 That is consumers of healthcare 21 00:01:01,460 --> 00:01:02,780 have more information about 22 00:01:02,780 --> 00:01:05,100 their health status than insurers do. 23 00:01:05,480 --> 00:01:08,880 In this scenario, insurers have to price the coverage 24 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:12,000 based on the average cost among all consumers, 25 00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:13,975 namely, $15,000. 26 00:01:14,530 --> 00:01:18,960 But if the insurance costs $15,000, then a portion of the market, 27 00:01:18,960 --> 00:01:20,830 the relatively healthy people, 28 00:01:20,830 --> 00:01:23,460 they will choose not to buy insurance as 29 00:01:23,460 --> 00:01:26,130 the cost of that insurance is greater to them 30 00:01:26,130 --> 00:01:27,543 than the expected benefit. 31 00:01:27,880 --> 00:01:31,300 So only part of this market will buy insurance. 32 00:01:31,300 --> 00:01:33,950 The average cost of those who actually will buy 33 00:01:33,950 --> 00:01:39,420 is then not $15,000 but $22,500. 34 00:01:39,420 --> 00:01:41,830 In that case, the insurance company, 35 00:01:41,830 --> 00:01:45,580 if it tries to price at $15,000, loses money. 36 00:01:45,580 --> 00:01:51,400 If the insurance company instead raises the price to $22,500, 37 00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:55,217 well, the same dynamic is actually going to kick in again. 38 00:01:55,217 --> 00:01:56,677 That is relatively healthy people 39 00:01:56,677 --> 00:01:58,900 won't find it worth paying that price. 40 00:01:58,900 --> 00:02:01,290 The sicker people still will buy, 41 00:02:01,290 --> 00:02:03,030 and that will raise the expected costs 42 00:02:03,030 --> 00:02:06,423 to the insurer, and thus the price even further. 43 00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:10,400 This dynamic continues until the individual insurance firm 44 00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:13,200 finds there is no price at which it can attract 45 00:02:13,200 --> 00:02:16,020 a set of customers with healthcare costs 46 00:02:16,020 --> 00:02:18,312 lower than the price of insurance. 47 00:02:18,540 --> 00:02:23,140 This is the same death spiral we saw before with used cars 48 00:02:23,140 --> 00:02:24,833 and it leads to a market failure. 49 00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:27,540 As we saw in the used car market, 50 00:02:27,540 --> 00:02:30,540 there are several reasons why reality may differ 51 00:02:30,540 --> 00:02:32,350 from the simple model. 52 00:02:32,350 --> 00:02:35,500 First, the model we laid out would predict that the healthy people, 53 00:02:35,500 --> 00:02:38,050 those who exercise, eat their veggies, 54 00:02:38,050 --> 00:02:41,370 and buckle their seatbelts would not buy insurance, 55 00:02:41,370 --> 00:02:45,370 while the model is predicting that the smokers, the mountain climbers, 56 00:02:45,370 --> 00:02:48,550 and the motorcycle riders would buy insurance. 57 00:02:48,550 --> 00:02:51,240 Is this true? Mostly no. 58 00:02:51,240 --> 00:02:52,960 The people who buy health insurance 59 00:02:52,960 --> 00:02:56,490 actually turn out to be the healthier people as well. 60 00:02:56,490 --> 00:02:57,830 Why is that? 61 00:02:57,830 --> 00:03:01,400 Well, those who try to avoid risk by eating well 62 00:03:01,400 --> 00:03:04,870 also try to avoid risk by buying health insurance. 63 00:03:04,870 --> 00:03:06,220 Our initial assumption that 64 00:03:06,220 --> 00:03:08,480 everyone calculates costs and benefits 65 00:03:08,480 --> 00:03:10,720 in exactly the same way is too simple. 66 00:03:10,720 --> 00:03:12,680 Once you account for the fact that 67 00:03:12,680 --> 00:03:15,880 people have differential tolerances for risk, 68 00:03:15,880 --> 00:03:18,390 you can end up having the healthier people be 69 00:03:18,390 --> 00:03:21,100 those who choose to buy the health insurance. 70 00:03:21,100 --> 00:03:24,050 This is called “propitious selection” 71 00:03:24,050 --> 00:03:27,280 where the people who buy the health insurance are healthier, 72 00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:29,320 not sicker than average. 73 00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:32,512 This can keep costs low, and prevent the death spiral. 74 00:03:33,540 --> 00:03:36,630 Another possible response to the adverse selection problem 75 00:03:36,630 --> 00:03:39,440 in health insurance might seem familiar. 76 00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:42,440 If you recall, we saw that services such as 77 00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:45,170 CARFAX and Certified Inspections 78 00:03:45,170 --> 00:03:47,830 can alleviate the asymmetric information problem 79 00:03:47,830 --> 00:03:49,750 when buying a used car. 80 00:03:49,750 --> 00:03:52,640 These services allow the buyer of the car 81 00:03:52,640 --> 00:03:54,000 to have similar information 82 00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:57,000 to that possessed by the seller of the car. 83 00:03:57,620 --> 00:04:00,080 The result of this information is that better cars 84 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:03,530 can sell for more, and lemons can sell for less. 85 00:04:03,530 --> 00:04:06,710 Is there an analogous approach for people in health insurance? 86 00:04:06,710 --> 00:04:07,900 Well, yes. 87 00:04:07,900 --> 00:04:09,750 The health of people can be inspected 88 00:04:09,750 --> 00:04:11,910 just as cars are inspected. 89 00:04:11,910 --> 00:04:14,989 So while consumers initially may have more information 90 00:04:14,989 --> 00:04:18,450 about their health than what the insurance companies have, 91 00:04:18,450 --> 00:04:20,650 a checkup will allow the insurance firms 92 00:04:20,650 --> 00:04:23,530 to get a better idea of the consumer's expected 93 00:04:23,530 --> 00:04:24,960 healthcare costs. 94 00:04:24,960 --> 00:04:27,120 And that allows the insurance companies 95 00:04:27,120 --> 00:04:31,630 to charge healthy consumers less and sicker consumers more. 96 00:04:32,100 --> 00:04:33,160 In the used car market, 97 00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:35,180 that seemed like a pretty good solution. 98 00:04:35,180 --> 00:04:37,600 After all, better cars should sell for more, 99 00:04:37,600 --> 00:04:40,180 and lemons should sell for less. 100 00:04:40,180 --> 00:04:41,510 In the health insurance market, 101 00:04:41,510 --> 00:04:43,380 that solution might work, 102 00:04:43,380 --> 00:04:45,630 but some people feel it is doubly unfair. 103 00:04:45,630 --> 00:04:47,860 Not only are the sick sick, 104 00:04:47,860 --> 00:04:49,710 but now they also have to pay more 105 00:04:49,710 --> 00:04:51,570 for their health insurance. 106 00:04:51,570 --> 00:04:53,120 Another problem with inspection is that 107 00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:55,610 it might reveal too much information, 108 00:04:55,610 --> 00:04:59,160 thereby rendering health insurance no longer viable. 109 00:04:59,160 --> 00:05:02,270 For instance, let's say there's a very good diagnostic test, 110 00:05:02,270 --> 00:05:05,350 and it determines that a patient A has cancer 111 00:05:05,350 --> 00:05:09,540 and then B we know that cancer will cost $1 million to treat. 112 00:05:09,540 --> 00:05:11,550 Well, to insure against that cancer, 113 00:05:11,550 --> 00:05:14,750 the price of the policy has to be about $1 million, 114 00:05:14,750 --> 00:05:16,520 but that's no longer insurance. 115 00:05:16,520 --> 00:05:19,110 That's just presenting the patient with the bill. 116 00:05:19,110 --> 00:05:23,070 Insurance is protecting against unexpected states of affairs, 117 00:05:23,070 --> 00:05:25,150 and it's a kind of risk pooling, 118 00:05:25,150 --> 00:05:27,740 a kind of protecting yourself against the high bill. 119 00:05:27,740 --> 00:05:30,048 But if you're getting the high bill no matter what when you're sick, 120 00:05:30,048 --> 00:05:34,060 well, then we've lost those benefits of insurance. 121 00:05:34,660 --> 00:05:37,260 Another solution to the adverse selection problem 122 00:05:37,260 --> 00:05:39,630 when used extensively in the United States 123 00:05:39,630 --> 00:05:42,110 is group health insurance through employers. 124 00:05:42,110 --> 00:05:46,150 Most people in America don't purchase insurance directly. 125 00:05:46,150 --> 00:05:48,290 Instead, their employer purchases it for them 126 00:05:48,290 --> 00:05:49,685 as part of a group plan. 127 00:05:50,490 --> 00:05:53,650 The benefit of the system is that the insurance company 128 00:05:53,650 --> 00:05:57,080 doesn't have to worry about adverse selection so much 129 00:05:57,080 --> 00:05:59,875 The employer doesn't know much more about its employees' health 130 00:05:59,875 --> 00:06:02,232 than does the insurance firm. 131 00:06:02,232 --> 00:06:04,209 Furthermore, the employer is going to be buying 132 00:06:04,209 --> 00:06:08,052 health insurance for the employees regardless of their health. 133 00:06:08,052 --> 00:06:11,420 So for these reasons, the adverse selection problem is 134 00:06:11,420 --> 00:06:14,310 much weaker with group health insurance. 135 00:06:14,310 --> 00:06:17,770 Group health insurance, however, does cause other problems. 136 00:06:17,770 --> 00:06:20,810 If you lose your job, you can lose your health insurance. 137 00:06:20,810 --> 00:06:23,220 And what we do about retirees? 138 00:06:23,860 --> 00:06:26,220 In the United States, various laws have made 139 00:06:26,220 --> 00:06:28,520 health insurance more affordable, 140 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:31,170 and furthermore retirees are insured by the government 141 00:06:31,170 --> 00:06:32,690 under Medicare. 142 00:06:32,690 --> 00:06:37,140 So, there are some solutions, albeit imperfect ones as usual. 143 00:06:37,580 --> 00:06:40,930 The most recent approach to the adverse selection problem 144 00:06:40,930 --> 00:06:43,390 was implemented in the Affordable Care Act, 145 00:06:43,390 --> 00:06:45,558 otherwise known as Obamacare. 146 00:06:46,210 --> 00:06:47,830 Under the Affordable Care Act, 147 00:06:47,830 --> 00:06:50,590 everyone is supposed to buy health insurance. 148 00:06:50,590 --> 00:06:53,550 If you don't, you will be fined by law. 149 00:06:53,550 --> 00:06:57,660 The idea here is to force all the healthy people into the pool 150 00:06:57,660 --> 00:06:59,300 of those who buy insurance 151 00:06:59,300 --> 00:07:01,820 that will moderate the cost of health insurance, 152 00:07:01,820 --> 00:07:04,280 and we will avoid the death spiral. 153 00:07:04,280 --> 00:07:06,120 As you can see, although 154 00:07:06,120 --> 00:07:08,550 the adverse selection model is pretty simple, 155 00:07:08,550 --> 00:07:10,150 it has lots of applications 156 00:07:10,150 --> 00:07:13,230 to some pretty complex real-world problems. 157 00:07:13,230 --> 00:07:17,000 Next up we'll tackle moral hazard. See you then. 158 00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:18,790 ♪ [music] ♪ 159 00:07:18,790 --> 00:07:19,790 - [Announcer] If you want to test yourself, 160 00:07:19,790 --> 00:07:21,945 click “Practice Questions." 161 00:07:22,315 --> 00:07:26,279 Or, if you're ready to move on, just click “Next Video.”