WEBVTT 00:00:00.325 --> 00:00:02.388 In the middle of my Ph.D., 00:00:02.388 --> 00:00:05.850 I was hopelessly stuck. 00:00:05.850 --> 00:00:07.630 Every research direction that I tried 00:00:07.630 --> 00:00:09.246 led to a dead end. 00:00:09.246 --> 00:00:11.148 It seemed like my basic assumptions 00:00:11.148 --> 00:00:13.076 just stopped working. 00:00:13.076 --> 00:00:16.075 I felt like a pilot flying through the mist, 00:00:16.075 --> 00:00:18.870 and I lost all sense of direction. 00:00:18.870 --> 00:00:20.351 I stopped shaving. 00:00:20.351 --> 00:00:23.092 I couldn't get out of bed in the morning. 00:00:23.092 --> 00:00:24.825 I felt unworthy 00:00:24.825 --> 00:00:27.978 of stepping across the gates of the university, 00:00:27.978 --> 00:00:30.126 because I wasn't like Einstein or Newton 00:00:30.126 --> 00:00:32.279 or any other scientist whose results 00:00:32.279 --> 00:00:33.810 I had learned about, because in science, 00:00:33.810 --> 00:00:37.192 we just learn about the results, not the process. 00:00:37.192 --> 00:00:41.893 And so obviously, I couldn't be a scientist. NOTE Paragraph 00:00:41.893 --> 00:00:43.557 But I had enough support 00:00:43.557 --> 00:00:44.954 and I made it through 00:00:44.954 --> 00:00:47.174 and discovered something new about nature. 00:00:47.174 --> 00:00:49.917 This is an amazing feeling of calmness, 00:00:49.917 --> 00:00:51.249 being the only person in the world 00:00:51.249 --> 00:00:53.474 who knows a new law of nature. 00:00:53.474 --> 00:00:56.516 And I started the second project in my Ph.D, 00:00:56.516 --> 00:00:57.880 and it happened again. 00:00:57.880 --> 00:01:00.169 I got stuck and I made it through. 00:01:00.169 --> 00:01:01.555 And I started thinking, 00:01:01.555 --> 00:01:02.712 maybe there's a pattern here. 00:01:02.712 --> 00:01:04.553 I asked the other graduate students, and they said, 00:01:04.553 --> 00:01:06.596 "Yeah, that's exactly what happened to us, 00:01:06.596 --> 00:01:08.945 except nobody told us about it." 00:01:08.945 --> 00:01:10.895 We'd all studied science as if it's a series 00:01:10.895 --> 00:01:14.471 of logical steps between question and answer, 00:01:14.471 --> 00:01:17.217 but doing research is nothing like that. NOTE Paragraph 00:01:17.217 --> 00:01:19.551 At the same time, I was also studying 00:01:19.551 --> 00:01:21.638 to be an improvisation theater actor. 00:01:21.638 --> 00:01:23.072 So physics by day, 00:01:23.072 --> 00:01:25.090 and by night, laughing, jumping, singing, 00:01:25.090 --> 00:01:26.402 playing my guitar. 00:01:26.402 --> 00:01:27.881 Improvisation theater, 00:01:27.881 --> 00:01:30.890 just like science, goes into the unknown, 00:01:30.890 --> 00:01:32.302 because you have to make a scene onstage 00:01:32.302 --> 00:01:34.005 without a director, without a script, 00:01:34.005 --> 00:01:36.283 without having any idea what you'll portray 00:01:36.283 --> 00:01:38.689 or what the other characters will do. 00:01:38.689 --> 00:01:40.538 But unlike science, 00:01:40.538 --> 00:01:43.561 in improvisation theater, they tell you from day one 00:01:43.561 --> 00:01:45.776 what's going to happen to you when you get onstage. 00:01:45.776 --> 00:01:48.548 You're going to fail miserably. 00:01:48.548 --> 00:01:49.725 You're going to get stuck. 00:01:49.725 --> 00:01:51.843 And we would practice staying creative 00:01:51.843 --> 00:01:53.046 inside that stuck place. 00:01:53.046 --> 00:01:54.951 For example, we had an exercise 00:01:54.951 --> 00:01:56.093 where we all stood in a circle, 00:01:56.093 --> 00:01:59.058 and each person had to do the world's worst tap dance, 00:01:59.058 --> 00:02:00.644 and everybody else applauded 00:02:00.644 --> 00:02:01.886 and cheered you on, 00:02:01.886 --> 00:02:04.649 supporting you onstage. NOTE Paragraph 00:02:04.649 --> 00:02:06.557 When I became a professor 00:02:06.557 --> 00:02:07.938 and had to guide my own students 00:02:07.938 --> 00:02:09.911 through their research projects, 00:02:09.911 --> 00:02:11.278 I realized again, 00:02:11.278 --> 00:02:12.990 I don't know what to do. 00:02:12.990 --> 00:02:14.984 I'd studied thousands of hours of physics, 00:02:14.984 --> 00:02:16.598 biology, chemistry, 00:02:16.598 --> 00:02:18.970 but not one hour, not one concept 00:02:18.970 --> 00:02:21.556 on how to mentor, how to guide someone 00:02:21.556 --> 00:02:23.293 to go together into the unknown, 00:02:23.293 --> 00:02:25.214 about motivation. NOTE Paragraph 00:02:25.214 --> 00:02:27.144 So I turned to improvisation theater, 00:02:27.144 --> 00:02:29.317 and I told my students from day one 00:02:29.317 --> 00:02:32.218 what's going to happen when you start research, 00:02:32.218 --> 00:02:33.944 and this has to do with our mental schema 00:02:33.944 --> 00:02:35.956 of what research will be like. 00:02:35.956 --> 00:02:38.234 Because you see, whenever people do anything, 00:02:38.234 --> 00:02:40.876 for example if I want to touch this blackboard, 00:02:40.876 --> 00:02:42.536 my brain first builds up a schema, 00:02:42.536 --> 00:02:44.395 a prediction of exactly what my muscles will do 00:02:44.395 --> 00:02:46.551 before I even start moving my hand, 00:02:46.551 --> 00:02:48.399 and if I get blocked, 00:02:48.399 --> 00:02:50.274 if my schema doesn't match reality, 00:02:50.274 --> 00:02:52.558 that causes extra stress called cognitive dissonance. 00:02:52.558 --> 00:02:55.467 That's why your schemas had better match reality. 00:02:55.467 --> 00:02:58.622 But if you believe the way science is taught, 00:02:58.622 --> 00:03:00.519 and if you believe textbooks, you're liable 00:03:00.519 --> 00:03:06.813 to have the following schema of research. 00:03:06.813 --> 00:03:10.131 If A is the question, 00:03:10.131 --> 00:03:13.531 and B is the answer, 00:03:13.531 --> 00:03:18.124 then research is a direct path. 00:03:18.127 --> 00:03:21.242 The problem is that if an experiment doesn't work, 00:03:21.242 --> 00:03:24.904 or a student gets depressed, 00:03:24.904 --> 00:03:26.990 it's perceived as something utterly wrong 00:03:26.990 --> 00:03:30.020 and causes tremendous stress. 00:03:30.020 --> 00:03:31.803 And that's why I teach my students 00:03:31.803 --> 00:03:35.665 a more realistic schema. 00:03:38.860 --> 00:03:40.384 Here's an example 00:03:40.384 --> 00:03:43.520 where things don't match your schema. 00:03:46.379 --> 00:03:49.641 (Laughter) 00:03:49.641 --> 00:03:52.840 (Applause) NOTE Paragraph 00:04:01.564 --> 00:04:05.010 So I teach my students a different schema. 00:04:05.010 --> 00:04:07.204 If A is the question, 00:04:07.204 --> 00:04:09.385 B is the answer, 00:04:13.320 --> 00:04:14.855 stay creative in the cloud, 00:04:14.855 --> 00:04:16.830 and you start going, 00:04:16.830 --> 00:04:19.193 and experiments don't work, experiments don't work, 00:04:19.193 --> 00:04:21.728 experiments don't work, experiments don't work, 00:04:21.728 --> 00:04:24.404 until you reach a place linked with negative emotions 00:04:24.404 --> 00:04:26.682 where it seems like your basic assumptions 00:04:26.682 --> 00:04:27.798 have stopped making sense, 00:04:27.798 --> 00:04:30.853 like somebody yanked the carpet beneath your feet. 00:04:30.853 --> 00:04:34.181 And I call this place the cloud. 00:04:47.685 --> 00:04:50.363 Now you can be lost in the cloud 00:04:50.363 --> 00:04:52.871 for a day, a week, a month, a year, 00:04:52.871 --> 00:04:54.369 a whole career, 00:04:54.369 --> 00:04:56.531 but sometimes, if you're lucky enough 00:04:56.531 --> 00:04:58.387 and you have enough support, 00:04:58.387 --> 00:05:00.377 you can see in the materials at hand, 00:05:00.377 --> 00:05:03.625 or perhaps meditating on the shape of the cloud, 00:05:03.625 --> 00:05:05.627 a new answer, 00:05:07.285 --> 00:05:10.969 C, and you decide to go for it. 00:05:10.969 --> 00:05:13.338 And experiments don't work, experiments don't work, 00:05:13.338 --> 00:05:14.807 but you get there, 00:05:14.807 --> 00:05:16.027 and then you tell everyone about it 00:05:16.027 --> 00:05:19.529 by publishing a paper that reads A arrow C, 00:05:19.529 --> 00:05:21.488 which is a great way to communicate, 00:05:21.488 --> 00:05:23.832 but as long as you don't forget the path 00:05:23.832 --> 00:05:25.631 that brought you there. NOTE Paragraph 00:05:25.631 --> 00:05:27.606 Now this cloud is an inherent part 00:05:27.606 --> 00:05:30.210 of research, an inherent part of our craft, 00:05:30.210 --> 00:05:33.420 because the cloud stands guard at the boundary. 00:05:37.721 --> 00:05:39.990 It stands guard at the boundary 00:05:39.990 --> 00:05:42.962 between the known 00:05:45.795 --> 00:05:49.399 and the unknown, 00:05:53.110 --> 00:05:55.385 because in order to discover something truly new, 00:05:55.385 --> 00:05:58.962 at least one of your basic assumptions has to change, 00:05:58.962 --> 00:06:00.216 and that means that in science, 00:06:00.216 --> 00:06:02.178 we do something quite heroic. 00:06:02.178 --> 00:06:03.999 Every day, we try to bring ourselves 00:06:03.999 --> 00:06:05.811 to the boundary between the known and the unknown 00:06:05.811 --> 00:06:07.632 and face the cloud. NOTE Paragraph 00:06:07.632 --> 00:06:09.337 Now notice that I put B 00:06:09.337 --> 00:06:10.080 in the land of the known, 00:06:10.080 --> 00:06:11.891 because we knew about it in the beginning, 00:06:11.891 --> 00:06:15.540 but C is always more interesting 00:06:15.540 --> 00:06:18.263 and more important than B. 00:06:18.263 --> 00:06:20.456 So B is essential in order to get going, 00:06:20.456 --> 00:06:22.274 but C is much more profound, 00:06:22.274 --> 00:06:26.771 and that's the amazing thing about resesarch. NOTE Paragraph 00:06:26.771 --> 00:06:28.959 Now just knowing that word, the cloud, 00:06:28.959 --> 00:06:31.514 has been transformational in my research group, 00:06:31.514 --> 00:06:33.384 because students come to me and say, 00:06:33.384 --> 00:06:34.982 "Uri, I'm in the cloud," 00:06:34.982 --> 00:06:38.148 and I say, "Great, you must be feeling miserable." 00:06:38.148 --> 00:06:40.290 (Laughter) 00:06:40.290 --> 00:06:42.203 But I'm kind of happy, 00:06:42.203 --> 00:06:43.881 because we might be close to the boundary 00:06:43.881 --> 00:06:45.777 between the known and the unknown, 00:06:45.777 --> 00:06:47.323 and we stand a chance of discovering 00:06:47.323 --> 00:06:49.184 something truly new, 00:06:49.184 --> 00:06:50.526 since the way our mind works, 00:06:50.526 --> 00:06:53.674 it's just knowing that the cloud 00:06:53.674 --> 00:06:58.100 is normal, it's essential, 00:06:58.100 --> 00:06:59.305 and in fact beautiful, 00:06:59.305 --> 00:07:02.928 we can join the Cloud Appreciation Society, 00:07:02.928 --> 00:07:04.846 and it detoxifies the feeling that something 00:07:04.846 --> 00:07:07.408 is deeply wrong with me. 00:07:07.408 --> 00:07:09.858 And as a mentor, I know what to do, 00:07:09.858 --> 00:07:12.060 which is to step up my support for the student, 00:07:12.060 --> 00:07:13.541 because research in psychology shows 00:07:13.541 --> 00:07:17.100 that if you're feeling fear and despair, 00:07:17.100 --> 00:07:18.097 your mind narrows down 00:07:18.097 --> 00:07:20.928 to very safe and conservative ways of thinking. 00:07:20.928 --> 00:07:22.503 If you'd like to explore the risky paths 00:07:22.503 --> 00:07:23.891 needed to get out of the cloud, 00:07:23.891 --> 00:07:25.652 you need other emotions -- 00:07:25.652 --> 00:07:27.853 solidarity, support, hope — 00:07:27.853 --> 00:07:29.590 that come with your connection from somebody else, 00:07:29.590 --> 00:07:31.140 so like in improvisation theater, 00:07:31.140 --> 00:07:33.441 in science, it's best to walk into the unknown 00:07:33.441 --> 00:07:35.410 together. NOTE Paragraph 00:07:35.410 --> 00:07:37.852 So knowing about the cloud, 00:07:37.852 --> 00:07:41.176 you also learn from improvisation theater 00:07:41.176 --> 00:07:43.778 a very effective way to have conversations 00:07:43.778 --> 00:07:45.538 inside the cloud. 00:07:45.538 --> 00:07:47.515 It's based on the central principle 00:07:47.515 --> 00:07:49.282 of improvisation theater, 00:07:49.282 --> 00:07:50.375 so here improvisation theater 00:07:50.375 --> 00:07:51.671 came to my help again. 00:07:51.671 --> 00:07:53.962 It's called saying "Yes, and" 00:07:53.962 --> 00:07:57.427 to the offers made by other actors. 00:08:04.297 --> 00:08:07.191 That means accepting the offers 00:08:07.191 --> 00:08:09.702 and building on them, saying, "Yes, and." 00:08:09.702 --> 00:08:10.941 For example, if one actor says, 00:08:10.941 --> 00:08:12.096 "Here is a pool of water," 00:08:12.096 --> 00:08:13.141 and the other actor says, 00:08:13.141 --> 00:08:15.010 "No, that's just a stage," 00:08:15.010 --> 00:08:16.748 the improvisation is over. 00:08:16.748 --> 00:08:20.520 It's dead, and everybody feels frustrated. 00:08:20.520 --> 00:08:21.868 That's called blocking. 00:08:21.868 --> 00:08:23.475 If you're not mindful of communications, 00:08:23.475 --> 00:08:26.412 scientific conversations can have a lot of blocking. NOTE Paragraph 00:08:26.412 --> 00:08:28.648 Saying "Yes, and" sounds like this. NOTE Paragraph 00:08:28.648 --> 00:08:31.156 "Here is a pool of water." "Yeah, let's jump in." NOTE Paragraph 00:08:31.156 --> 00:08:34.165 "Look, there's a whale! Let's grab it by its tail. 00:08:34.165 --> 00:08:36.266 It's pulling us to the moon!" NOTE Paragraph 00:08:36.266 --> 00:08:39.286 So saying "Yes, and" bypasses our inner critic. 00:08:39.286 --> 00:08:40.980 We all have an inner critic 00:08:40.980 --> 00:08:42.221 that kind of guards what we say, 00:08:42.221 --> 00:08:44.144 so people don't think that we're obscene 00:08:44.144 --> 00:08:45.259 or crazy or unoriginal, 00:08:45.259 --> 00:08:46.519 and science is full of the fear 00:08:46.519 --> 00:08:48.076 of appearing unoriginal. 00:08:48.076 --> 00:08:50.243 Saying "Yes, and" bypasses the critic 00:08:50.243 --> 00:08:52.855 and unlocks hidden voices of creativity 00:08:52.855 --> 00:08:54.380 you didn't even know that you had, 00:08:54.380 --> 00:08:56.410 and they often carry the answer 00:08:56.410 --> 00:08:58.815 about the cloud. NOTE Paragraph 00:08:58.815 --> 00:09:01.416 So you see, knowing about the cloud 00:09:01.416 --> 00:09:02.820 and about saying "Yes, and" 00:09:02.820 --> 00:09:05.679 made my lab very creative. 00:09:05.679 --> 00:09:08.207 Students started playing off of each others' ideas, 00:09:08.207 --> 00:09:10.321 and we made surprising discoveries 00:09:10.321 --> 00:09:13.190 in the interface between physics and biology. 00:09:13.190 --> 00:09:16.140 For example, we were stuck for a year 00:09:16.140 --> 00:09:17.289 trying to understand the intricate 00:09:17.289 --> 00:09:19.982 biochemical networks inside our cells, 00:09:19.982 --> 00:09:22.439 and we said, "We are deeply in the cloud," 00:09:22.439 --> 00:09:24.419 and we had a playful conversation 00:09:24.419 --> 00:09:26.207 where my student Shai Shen Orr said, 00:09:26.207 --> 00:09:29.050 "Let's just draw this on a piece of paper, this network," 00:09:29.050 --> 00:09:30.503 and instead of saying, 00:09:30.503 --> 00:09:32.654 "But we've done that so many times 00:09:32.654 --> 00:09:33.688 and it doesn't work," 00:09:33.688 --> 00:09:36.631 I said, "Yes, and 00:09:36.631 --> 00:09:38.672 let's use a very big piece of paper," 00:09:38.672 --> 00:09:39.764 and then Ron Milo said, 00:09:39.764 --> 00:09:41.984 "Let's use a gigantic architect's 00:09:41.984 --> 00:09:43.780 blueprint kind of paper, and I know where to print it," 00:09:43.780 --> 00:09:46.280 and we printed out the network and looked at it, 00:09:46.280 --> 00:09:48.789 and that's where we made our most important discovery, 00:09:48.789 --> 00:09:50.990 that this complicated network is just made 00:09:50.990 --> 00:09:54.453 of a handful of simple, repeating interaction patterns 00:09:54.453 --> 00:09:57.616 like motifs in a stained glass window. 00:09:57.616 --> 00:09:59.664 We call them network motifs, 00:09:59.664 --> 00:10:01.816 and they're the elementary circuits 00:10:01.816 --> 00:10:03.201 that help us understand 00:10:03.201 --> 00:10:05.901 the logic of the way cells make decisions 00:10:05.901 --> 00:10:08.750 in all organisms, including our body. NOTE Paragraph 00:10:08.750 --> 00:10:10.675 Soon enough, after this, 00:10:10.675 --> 00:10:12.295 I started being invited to give talks 00:10:12.295 --> 00:10:15.306 to thousands of scientists across the world, 00:10:15.306 --> 00:10:17.139 but the knowledge about the cloud 00:10:17.139 --> 00:10:18.271 and saying "Yes, and" 00:10:18.271 --> 00:10:20.110 just stayed within my own lab, 00:10:20.110 --> 00:10:22.241 because you see, in science, we don't talk about the process, 00:10:22.241 --> 00:10:24.674 anything subjective or emotional. 00:10:24.674 --> 00:10:26.537 We talk about the results. 00:10:26.537 --> 00:10:28.606 So there was no way to talk about it in conferences. 00:10:28.606 --> 00:10:30.530 That was unthinkable. 00:10:30.530 --> 00:10:32.606 And I saw scientists in other groups get stuck 00:10:32.606 --> 00:10:34.380 without even having a word to describe 00:10:34.380 --> 00:10:35.701 what they're seeing, 00:10:35.701 --> 00:10:37.056 and their ways of thinking 00:10:37.056 --> 00:10:38.584 narrowed down to very safe paths, 00:10:38.584 --> 00:10:40.244 their science didn't reach its full potential, 00:10:40.244 --> 00:10:41.997 and they were miserable. 00:10:41.997 --> 00:10:43.936 I thought, that's the way it is. 00:10:43.936 --> 00:10:45.957 I'll try to make my lab as creative as possible, 00:10:45.957 --> 00:10:47.637 and if everybody else does the same, 00:10:47.637 --> 00:10:49.827 science will eventually become 00:10:49.827 --> 00:10:52.041 more and more better and better. NOTE Paragraph 00:10:52.041 --> 00:10:54.961 That way of thinking got turned on its head 00:10:54.961 --> 00:10:57.300 when by chance I went to hear Evelyn Fox Keller 00:10:57.300 --> 00:10:58.658 give a talk about her experiences 00:10:58.658 --> 00:11:00.349 as a woman in science. 00:11:00.349 --> 00:11:02.172 And she asked, 00:11:02.172 --> 00:11:04.120 "Why is it that we don't talk about the subjective 00:11:04.120 --> 00:11:06.306 and emotional aspects of doing science? 00:11:06.306 --> 00:11:10.298 It's not by chance. It's a matter of values." 00:11:10.298 --> 00:11:12.476 You see, science seeks knowledge 00:11:12.476 --> 00:11:14.271 that's objective and rational. 00:11:14.271 --> 00:11:16.469 That's the beautiful thing about science. 00:11:16.469 --> 00:11:18.425 But we also have a cultural myth 00:11:18.425 --> 00:11:19.679 that the doing of science, 00:11:19.679 --> 00:11:21.979 what we do every day to get that knowledge, 00:11:21.979 --> 00:11:24.419 is also only objective and rational, 00:11:24.419 --> 00:11:26.851 like Mr. Spock. 00:11:26.851 --> 00:11:28.265 And when you label something 00:11:28.265 --> 00:11:30.078 as objective and rational, 00:11:30.078 --> 00:11:31.720 automatically, the other side, 00:11:31.720 --> 00:11:33.177 the subjective and emotional, 00:11:33.177 --> 00:11:35.279 become labeled as non-science 00:11:35.279 --> 00:11:37.250 or anti-science or threatening to science, 00:11:37.250 --> 00:11:39.061 and we just don't talk about it. 00:11:39.061 --> 00:11:41.015 And when I heard that, 00:11:41.015 --> 00:11:43.182 that science has a culture, 00:11:43.182 --> 00:11:44.729 everything clicked into place for me, 00:11:44.729 --> 00:11:46.393 because if science has a culture, 00:11:46.393 --> 00:11:47.649 culture can be changed, 00:11:47.649 --> 00:11:49.242 and I can be a change agent 00:11:49.242 --> 00:11:51.954 working to change the culture of science wherever I could. 00:11:51.954 --> 00:11:55.023 And so the very next lecture I gave in a conference, 00:11:55.023 --> 00:11:56.635 I talked about my science, 00:11:56.635 --> 00:11:58.147 and then I talked about the importance 00:11:58.147 --> 00:12:00.329 of the subjective and emotional aspects of doing science 00:12:00.329 --> 00:12:01.449 and how we should talk about them, 00:12:01.449 --> 00:12:02.683 and I looked at the audience, 00:12:02.683 --> 00:12:05.043 and they were cold. 00:12:05.043 --> 00:12:08.334 They couldn't hear what I was saying 00:12:08.334 --> 00:12:09.585 in the context of a 10 back-to-back 00:12:09.585 --> 00:12:11.424 PowerPoint presentation conference. 00:12:11.424 --> 00:12:13.906 And I tried again and again, conference after conference, 00:12:13.906 --> 00:12:16.279 but I wasn't getting through. 00:12:16.279 --> 00:12:19.185 I was in the cloud. NOTE Paragraph 00:12:19.185 --> 00:12:22.699 And eventually I managed to get out the cloud 00:12:22.699 --> 00:12:25.510 using improvisation and music. 00:12:25.510 --> 00:12:28.249 Since then, every conference I go to, 00:12:28.249 --> 00:12:31.111 I give a science talk and a second, special talk 00:12:31.111 --> 00:12:33.104 called "Love and fear in the lab," 00:12:33.104 --> 00:12:35.321 and I start it off by doing a song 00:12:35.321 --> 00:12:37.893 about scientists' greatest fear, 00:12:37.893 --> 00:12:40.805 which is that we work hard, 00:12:40.805 --> 00:12:43.147 we discover something new, 00:12:43.147 --> 00:12:46.504 and somebody else publishes it before we do. 00:12:46.504 --> 00:12:49.120 We call it being scooped, 00:12:49.120 --> 00:12:52.334 and being scooped feels horrible. 00:12:52.334 --> 00:12:54.547 It makes us afraid to talk to each other, 00:12:54.547 --> 00:12:55.380 which is no fun, 00:12:55.380 --> 00:12:58.140 because we came to science to share our ideas 00:12:58.140 --> 00:12:59.451 and to learn from each other, 00:12:59.451 --> 00:13:02.940 and so I do a blues song, 00:13:05.040 --> 00:13:10.544 which — (Applause) — 00:13:10.544 --> 00:13:13.767 called "Scooped Again," 00:13:13.767 --> 00:13:16.425 and I ask the audience to be my backup singers, 00:13:16.425 --> 00:13:20.405 and I tell them, "Your text is 'Scoop, Scoop.'" 00:13:20.405 --> 00:13:23.050 It sounds like this: "Scoop, scoop!" 00:13:23.050 --> 00:13:24.013 Sounds like this. NOTE Paragraph 00:13:24.013 --> 00:13:26.232 ♪ I've been scooped again ♪ NOTE Paragraph 00:13:26.232 --> 00:13:27.975 ♪ Scoop! Scoop! ♪ NOTE Paragraph 00:13:27.975 --> 00:13:29.253 And then we go for it. NOTE Paragraph 00:13:29.253 --> 00:13:31.298 ♪ I've been scooped again ♪ NOTE Paragraph 00:13:31.298 --> 00:13:32.584 ♪ Scoop! Scoop! ♪ NOTE Paragraph 00:13:32.584 --> 00:13:34.479 ♪ I've been scooped again ♪ NOTE Paragraph 00:13:34.479 --> 00:13:35.785 ♪ Scoop! Scoop! ♪ NOTE Paragraph 00:13:35.785 --> 00:13:37.568 ♪ I've been scooped again ♪ NOTE Paragraph 00:13:37.568 --> 00:13:39.207 ♪ Scoop! Scoop! ♪ NOTE Paragraph 00:13:39.207 --> 00:13:40.875 ♪ I've been scooped again ♪ NOTE Paragraph 00:13:40.875 --> 00:13:42.637 ♪ Scoop! Scoop! ♪ NOTE Paragraph 00:13:42.637 --> 00:13:45.912 ♪ Oh mama, can't you feel my pain ♪ NOTE Paragraph 00:13:45.912 --> 00:13:49.698 ♪ Heavens help me, I've been scooped again ♪ 00:13:50.925 --> 00:13:57.316 (Applause) NOTE Paragraph 00:13:57.735 --> 00:13:58.965 Thank you. 00:13:58.965 --> 00:14:00.464 Thank you for your backup singing. NOTE Paragraph 00:14:00.464 --> 00:14:02.548 So everybody starts laughing, starts breathing, 00:14:02.548 --> 00:14:04.560 notices that there's other scientists around them 00:14:04.560 --> 00:14:05.867 with shared issues, 00:14:05.867 --> 00:14:07.672 and we start talking about the emotional 00:14:07.672 --> 00:14:09.522 and subjective things that go on in research. 00:14:09.522 --> 00:14:11.706 It feels like a huge taboo has been lifted. 00:14:11.706 --> 00:14:14.505 Finally, we can talk about this in a scientific conference. 00:14:14.505 --> 00:14:16.691 And scientists have gone on to form peer groups 00:14:16.691 --> 00:14:18.301 where they meet regularly 00:14:18.301 --> 00:14:19.930 and create a space to talk about the emotional 00:14:19.930 --> 00:14:22.231 and subjective things that happen as they're mentoring, 00:14:22.231 --> 00:14:23.594 as they're going into the unknown, 00:14:23.594 --> 00:14:25.164 and even started courses 00:14:25.164 --> 00:14:26.839 about the process of doing science, 00:14:26.839 --> 00:14:28.734 about going into the unknown together, 00:14:28.734 --> 00:14:30.150 and many other things. NOTE Paragraph 00:14:30.150 --> 00:14:31.484 So my vision is that, 00:14:31.484 --> 00:14:34.946 just like every scientist knows the word "atom," 00:14:34.946 --> 00:14:36.913 that matter is made out of atoms, 00:14:36.913 --> 00:14:38.397 every scientist would know the words 00:14:38.397 --> 00:14:40.741 like "the cloud," saying "Yes, and," 00:14:40.741 --> 00:14:43.820 and science will become much more creative, 00:14:43.820 --> 00:14:46.824 make many, many more unexpected discoveries 00:14:46.824 --> 00:14:49.360 for the benefit of us all, 00:14:49.360 --> 00:14:51.576 and would also be much more playful. 00:14:51.576 --> 00:14:54.166 And what I might ask you to remember from this talk 00:14:54.166 --> 00:14:56.862 is that next time you face 00:14:56.862 --> 00:14:58.588 a problem you can't solve 00:14:58.588 --> 00:15:01.180 in work or in life, 00:15:01.180 --> 00:15:03.056 there's a word for what you're going to see: 00:15:03.056 --> 00:15:04.233 the cloud. 00:15:04.233 --> 00:15:05.766 And you can go through the cloud 00:15:05.766 --> 00:15:07.174 not alone but together 00:15:07.174 --> 00:15:09.212 with someone who is your source of support 00:15:09.212 --> 00:15:11.260 to say "Yes, and" to your ideas, 00:15:11.260 --> 00:15:13.577 to help you say "Yes, and" to your own ideas, 00:15:13.577 --> 00:15:15.464 to increase the chance that, 00:15:15.464 --> 00:15:17.190 through the wisps of the cloud, 00:15:17.190 --> 00:15:18.688 you'll find that moment of calmness 00:15:18.688 --> 00:15:20.491 where you get your first glimpse 00:15:20.491 --> 00:15:23.741 of your unexpected discovery, 00:15:23.741 --> 00:15:26.465 your C. NOTE Paragraph 00:15:26.465 --> 00:15:28.785 Thank you. NOTE Paragraph 00:15:28.785 --> 00:15:32.785 (Applause)