0:00:03.002,0:00:08.012 The change in the architecture of the media [br]is completely connected to a change of the control 0:00:08.012,0:00:11.006 With the broadcast system you have one person in one station 0:00:11.006,0:00:13.008 deciding what gets put out over the airwaves. 0:00:13.008,0:00:17.068 When you have distributed network like the internet everybody can be a server. 0:00:17.068,0:00:20.088 There's no distinction between the broadcaster and the receiver: 0:00:20.088,0:00:22.004 every computer does both. 0:00:22.004,0:00:27.012 You can take your home laptop and run a server off of it that can distribute movies and music 0:00:27.012,0:00:31.068 and webpages and email in the same way that the biggest computers at google can. 0:00:31.068,0:00:31.076 there's no fundamental difference between the computers they have in iraq in their server rooms 0:00:31.076,0:00:35.052 0:00:35.052,0:00:38.004 and what you have on your desk 0:00:38.004,0:00:39.006 In the old system of broadcasting, 0:00:39.006,0:00:42.076 you were fundamentally limited by the amount of space in the airwaves 0:00:42.076,0:00:46.044 you could only send out 10 channels over the airwaves in television 0:00:46.044,0:00:48.068 or even with cable you had 500 channels. 0:00:48.068,0:00:50.076 On the internet, everybody can have a channel; 0:00:50.076,0:00:53.008 everyone can get a blog or a MySpace page; 0:00:53.008,0:00:55.048 everyone has a way of expressing themselves 0:00:55.048,0:00:57.072 and so what you see now is not a question of 0:00:57.072,0:00:59.028 who gets access to the airwaves, 0:00:59.028,0:01:00.084 it's a question of who gets control 0:01:00.084,0:01:02.008 over the ways you find people. 0:01:02.008,0:01:05.044 You start seeing power centralising in sites like google, 0:01:05.044,0:01:08.006 these sort of 'gatekeepers' that tell you where on the internet you want to go 0:01:08.006,0:01:11.006 the people who provide you your sources of news and information. 0:01:11.006,0:01:15.028 so its not only certain people have a license to speak 0:01:15.028,0:01:16.068 now everyone has a license to speak, 0:01:16.068,0:01:19.004 it's question of who gets heard. 0:01:19.004,0:01:22.068 So one of the biggest questions we're facing in a world of many speakers 0:01:22.068,0:01:24.004 how do you find what's good? 0:01:24.004,0:01:27.036 Are we gonna go to a system like the old media where you go to CNN 0:01:27.036,0:01:29.028 and they pick a handful of people to focus on 0:01:29.028,0:01:30.028 and you read what they say 0:01:30.028,0:01:32.002 or are we going to go with something more like the internet 0:01:32.002,0:01:35.048 where everybody has a chance of being heard, a more democratic system. 0:01:35.048,0:01:38.044 One of the most interesting technologies for doing something like that 0:01:38.044,0:01:40.008 is a system called collaborative filtering, 0:01:40.008,0:01:43.068 where everybody expresses their opinions on what they like and what they don't like 0:01:43.068,0:01:47.044 and the computer tries to match you up with other people who have similar preferences 0:01:47.044,0:01:50.076 and recommend you things that they also like that you didn't know about before. 0:01:50.076,0:01:52.084 It's the same kind of system you see on Amazon 0:01:52.084,0:01:55.016 where people who bought this book also bought this book 0:01:55.016,0:01:58.000 people are trying to experiment that not only with books 0:01:58.000,0:02:01.012 but with blogs, web pages and news stories all across the internet, 0:02:01.012,0:02:04.004 they're trying to find ways and things that you've never heard of before 0:02:04.004,0:02:06.002 and bringing them in front of you 0:02:06.002,0:02:08.004 Mass media had this fundamental paradox 0:02:08.004,0:02:10.036 because it was aiming at a huge audience 0:02:10.036,0:02:12.076 but it wanted to convince everybody they were an individual 0:02:12.076,0:02:15.036 you see all these ads on television all the time like 0:02:15.036,0:02:17.006 'buck the trend, buy these jeans' right!? 0:02:17.006,0:02:20.028 and it's on a show that 4 million people are watching, 0:02:20.028,0:02:24.000 you're not going to buck a trend by doing what 4 million other people are. 0:02:24.000,0:02:27.004 Now that the internet is actually making these nitch things possible 0:02:27.004,0:02:29.004 the mass media is incredibly threatened 0:02:29.004,0:02:33.048 no longer this idea of bucking the crowd and being your own 0:02:33.048,0:02:36.028 it's no longer just a theory you can actually do it on the internet 0:02:36.028,0:02:40.056 And what we're starting to see is tools that take power away from the big conglomerates 0:02:40.056,0:02:42.048 and start to distribute it to small groups. 0:02:42.048,0:02:47.028 And so there are a bunch of issues in a system like that there are questions of funding you know, 0:02:47.028,0:02:50.052 how will these small groups get paid and how will the random blogger be able to live 0:02:50.052,0:02:53.006 in a way that an investigative journalist can now 0:02:53.006,0:02:55.092 because there's one giant source of advertising 0:02:55.092,0:02:59.088 you know there are question finding people, how will I be able to find the stuff I'm interested, 0:02:59.088,0:03:02.008 and the stuff that's trustworthy and reliable 0:03:02.008,0:03:04.072 and so for each of these there are new technologies 0:03:04.072,0:03:06.068 people are trying all kinds of different things 0:03:06.068,0:03:08.028 and all of these say different things about the internet 0:03:08.028,0:03:12.004 there is still experimentation in this, since everybody can just go up and start a website 0:03:12.004,0:03:15.068 with a new piece of technology that try and solve one of these problems 0:03:15.068,0:03:18.068 We're seeing lots of different possibilities, lots of different funding models 0:03:18.068,0:03:23.044 lots of different recommendations systems and who knows what will work best 0:03:23.044,0:03:25.008 we have a chance to try it all and see what falls out 0:03:25.008,0:03:27.088 So there are a couple of interesting funding models: 0:03:27.088,0:03:30.006 One of course is this standard model of advertising, 0:03:30.006,0:03:35.008 you go to a bunch of big corporate sponsors and instead of having them fund a television show 0:03:35.008,0:03:36.004 you have them fund your webpage 0:03:36.004,0:03:40.000 but a more interesting one is you do the same thing with nitch groups 0:03:40.000,0:03:45.012 instead of going to IBM/Ford or a big company, and having them buy a banner on your website 0:03:45.012,0:03:47.068 you go to people that actually care about the readers you have 0:03:47.068,0:03:50.076 if you're a design weblog you go to design companies 0:03:50.076,0:03:53.088 if you're a political blog, you go to other politicians 0:03:53.088,0:03:58.004 you have a very targeted narrow group of people who are really interested in the subject, 0:03:58.004,0:04:01.076 thats an audience advertisers really love 0:04:01.076,0:04:04.068 another possibility is to turn directly to your readers for support 0:04:04.068,0:04:07.072 you see blogs say, I wanna go to a trip to New Hampshire 0:04:07.072,0:04:10.044 to cover the american political conventions 0:04:10.044,0:04:12.000 will you support me? 0:04:12.000,0:04:13.004 and the readers pour in money 0:04:13.004,0:04:16.072 these people are very dedicated they feel like they have a personal connection 0:04:16.072,0:04:17.008 with the person writing 0:04:17.008,0:04:21.000 they are eager to spend money to support it! 0:04:21.000,0:04:23.088 Another thing is that you simply work of volunteer labor 0:04:23.088,0:04:27.004 you have people that have a day job thats an expert in a subject 0:04:27.004,0:04:30.036 and they just enjoy talking about it so they rate stuff in their free time 0:04:30.036,0:04:31.044 and publish it on the internet 0:04:31.044,0:04:34.000 or they have readers who read their site and contribute stuff 0:04:34.000,0:04:36.068 and it gets compiled into one exciting source. 0:04:36.068,0:04:39.004 So I think there are lots of interesting experiments, 0:04:39.004,0:04:41.000 people are trying lots of different ways 0:04:41.000,0:04:48.006 One of the errors you had with television, right, could only provide one level of interest 0:04:48.006,0:04:52.036 it was funded based on adertising not on how much people cared about the programme 0:04:52.036,0:04:56.028 advertisers were going to pay the same no matter how exciting or how compelling 0:04:56.028,0:04:58.016 or how interested an audience was in a show 0:04:58.016,0:05:01.092 so what you ended up with was fairly boring shows that appealed to lots of people 0:05:01.092,0:05:04.004 because that's what advertisers wanted 0:05:04.004,0:05:06.016 they wanted lots people watching the shows 0:05:06.016,0:05:08.028 whereas in a normal market economy what happens is 0:05:08.028,0:05:10.036 if you really want something you pay more for it 0:05:10.036,0:05:12.028 you just can't do that with television. 0:05:12.028,0:05:15.004 So one of the interesting things about broadcast is that a lot of what you like 0:05:15.004,0:05:17.004 depends on what other people like 0:05:17.004,0:05:19.024 there are only so many shows out there 0:05:19.024,0:05:20.002 they are all kind of bland 0:05:20.002,0:05:22.000 so what happens, you have these megahits 0:05:22.000,0:05:27.000 like American Idol or lost, where everybody at the water cooler is talking about this show, 0:05:27.000,0:05:30.012 so you have to watch it because otherwise you can't keep up with them 0:05:30.012,0:05:33.056 whatever social factors get involved 0:05:33.056,0:05:35.068 you have this sort of process of rich gets richer 0:05:35.068,0:05:40.036 one thing takes off because thats what everybody else is doing! 0:05:40.036,0:05:43.072 One nice thing about the internet is that it allows for so much more variety 0:05:43.072,0:05:48.000 that nitch products can get so much more attention and interest 0:05:48.000,0:05:50.076 So they've the run the numbers and this this proven mathematical fact 0:05:50.076,0:05:54.068 that as long as some percentage of what you care about is whether other people 0:05:54.068,0:05:58.068 like it or now you're gonna end up [br]with this patterns of hits and failures 0:05:58.068,0:06:01.072 if you have two things which are equivalent in quality, 0:06:01.072,0:06:04.068 one of them is liked by one more person [br]than the other one, 0:06:04.068,0:06:06.012 you're going to go that one 0:06:06.012,0:06:08.004 there's some small chance that you're going to go to that one 0:06:08.004,0:06:09.076 and everybody's going to start going to that one 0:06:09.076,0:06:11.016 and all of a sudden you have harry potter 0:06:11.016,0:06:14.088 this one book plucked of nowhere that suddenly becomes this massive mega-hit. 0:06:14.088,0:06:18.012 not because it's a hundred million times better written than every other book 0:06:18.012,0:06:21.000 but simply because everybody's reading it 0:06:21.000,0:06:23.008 and putting stuff on the internet doesn't change that, 0:06:23.008,0:06:27.004 you still care about what your friends like, still wanna read what everybody else is talking about, 0:06:27.004,0:06:30.076 ou still wanna do what's popular because you think maybe other people have a valid opinion 0:06:30.076,0:06:34.002 and maybe you wanna talk to them about it [br]maybe you want to join part of this community 0:06:34.002,0:06:37.024 but whatever your reason is, [br]as long as you care about what other people opinion 0:06:37.024,0:06:38.008 you're going to end up with these hits. 0:06:38.008,0:06:39.004 You just have this social signifier that everybody cares about 0:06:39.004,0:06:41.068 You just have this social signifier that everybody cares about 0:06:41.068,0:06:45.008 everybody's watching American Idol [br]doesn't matter how good the show is 0:06:45.008,0:06:49.048 I mean it has to be somewhat decent so people watch it, [br]but once everybody's watching it, 0:06:49.048,0:06:54.002 talking about it, you know, [br]it suddenly becomes this megahit for no real reason, 0:06:54.002,0:06:56.008 right, just because it's a social phenomenon 0:06:56.008,0:07:00.006 and what television does, it chops off the tale and it throws away all the other shows 0:07:00.006,0:07:03.004 people would like but don't care enough about to be megahits 0:07:03.004,0:07:06.068 and instead pours all of its money into these cheap produced shows 0:07:06.068,0:07:08.072 well you can't get rid of hits, right 0:07:08.072,0:07:11.004 it's a fact that people would wanna do what their friends are doing 0:07:11.004,0:07:15.052 you can't avoid that but what you can do is say [br]there's the whole rest of the world out there 0:07:15.052,0:07:19.000 there's a whole rest of what people care about other than what everybody else is doing 0:07:19.000,0:07:22.004 Everybody has their own particular interests everybody has something that fascinates them 0:07:22.004,0:07:25.072 and what the internet does is it allows them to 'do' that 0:07:25.072,0:07:29.008 to get involved and find other people who share these things 0:07:29.008,0:07:33.024 one of the exciting things about Wickipedia [br]is that it doesn't just have articles on 0:07:33.024,0:07:36.002 you know, 100 most popular things or 1000 most popular things 0:07:36.002,0:07:39.028 you can pick the most obscure subject in the world [br]and there's an article about it 0:07:39.028,0:07:43.004 Because for EVERYTHING, [br]there's someone who cares a great deal about it 0:07:43.004,0:07:46.006 and that's what television, [br]that's what radio doesn't provide, but the internet does! 0:07:46.006,0:07:50.008 it provides a way for you to get in touch [br]with those other people who really 0:07:50.008,0:07:52.048 care about this completely obscure thing 0:07:52.048,0:07:56.004 It doesn't just go into the direction of topic, [br]it goes into the direction of time 0:07:56.004,0:07:58.052 You can go back in time and find all the shows that have been canceled 0:07:58.052,0:08:00.084 find all the articles that have been deleted 0:08:00.084,0:08:04.004 you can go back and find everything that has been lost in major culture 0:08:04.004,0:08:05.048 and it's got a place on the internet 0:08:05.048,0:08:09.068 Youtube music videos from the 70s and the 80s [br]that you can't find anywhere these days 0:08:09.068,0:08:11.048 you can watch at your leisure 0:08:11.048,0:08:13.068 I think lessening the power of the hits 0:08:13.068,0:08:16.072 bringing down the things from the top [br]and making it more egalitarian 0:08:16.072,0:08:18.008 is the something we should always strive for 0:08:18.008,0:08:21.008 it may be really difficult it may not be super possible 0:08:21.008,0:08:24.008 but it's something to hope for, to drive for 0:08:24.008,0:08:26.072 and what that means is 0:08:26.072,0:08:31.002 throwing away as much as possible all the things that give you hints about 0:08:31.002,0:08:34.004 you should do this because other people like it 0:08:34.004,0:08:37.052 it's very tempting [br]when you're building a website or programming system 0:08:37.052,0:08:39.088 is to start sorting things that are really popular at the top 0:08:39.088,0:08:43.012 but all that does is, that it makes it less democratic and less fair 0:08:43.012,0:08:48.028 you have to have continual pressure, [br]to try and pull things from the bottom from the tale up 0:08:48.028,0:08:51.044 give everybody a chance to look at everything and if you do that 0:08:51.044,0:08:53.072 maybe, you won't get completely rid of hits, 0:08:53.072,0:08:55.068 but you can start to ???? some of their problems 0:08:55.068,0:08:59.004 I mean that's one power of data mining [br]is that construct to find obscure subjects 0:08:59.004,0:09:01.088 that you wouldn't have found [br]simply because they are not popular 0:09:01.088,0:09:03.092 you know one of the tools of recommendation 0:09:03.092,0:09:06.092 can be to pull you to the less popular stuff on the tale 0:09:06.092,0:09:10.000 The random article button on Wikipedia [br]is really cool in this sense 0:09:10.000,0:09:13.024 you can just wake up every day [br]and read about some completely random topic 0:09:13.024,0:09:17.008 that you never heard of except for the fact [br]that there's an article on the Wikipedia about it 0:09:17.008,9:59:59.000 and boy are there some completely random topics on Wikipepdia