9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 In 2009, two researchers ran a simple [br]experiment. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 They took everything we know about our[br]solar system and calculated 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 where every planet would be up to 5 [br]billion years in the future. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 To do so they ran over 2000 numerical [br]simulations 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 with the same exact initial conditions[br]except for one difference: 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 the distance between Mercury and the Sun,[br]modified by less than a millimeter 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 from one simulation to the next. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Shockingly, in about 1 percent of their [br]simulations, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Mercury’s orbit changed so drastically [br]that it could plunge into the Sun 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 or collide with Venus. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Worse yet, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 in one simulation it destabilized[br]the entire inner solar system. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 This was no error; the astonishing variety[br]in results 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 reveals the truth that our solar system [br]may be much less stable than it seems. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Astrophysicists refer to this astonishing[br]property of gravitational systems 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 as the n-body problem. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 While we have equations that can [br]completely predict the motions 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 of two gravitating masses, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 our analytical tools fall short when [br]faced with more populated systems. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 It’s actually impossible to write down[br]all the terms of a general formula 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that can exactly describe the motion[br]of three or more gravitating objects. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Why? The issue lies in how many unknown[br]variables an n-body system contains. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Thanks to Isaac Newton, we can write [br]a set of equations 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 to describe the gravitational force [br]acting between bodies. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 However, when trying to find a general [br]solution for the unknown variables 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 in these equations, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 we’re faced with a mathematical [br]constraint: for each unknown, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 there must be at least one equation [br]that independently describes it. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Initially, a two-body system appears to[br]have more unknown variables 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 for position and velocity than [br]equations of motion. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 However, there’s a trick: 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 consider the relative position and [br]velocity of the two bodies 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 with respect to the center of [br]gravity of the system. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 This reduces the number of unknowns[br]and leaves us with a solvable system. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 With three or more orbiting objects in the[br]picture, everything gets messier. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Even with the same mathematical trick [br]of considering relative motions, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 we’re left with more unknowns than [br]equations describing them. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 There are simply too many variables[br]for this system of equations 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 to be untangled into a general solution. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 But what does it actually look like for [br]objects in our universe 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 to move according to analytically [br]unsolvable equations of motion? 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 A system of three stars–– 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 like Alpha Centauri could come crashing[br]into one another or, more likely, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 some might get flung out of orbit [br]after a long time of apparent stability. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Other than a few highly improbable [br]stable configurations, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 almost every possible case is [br]unpredictable on long timescales. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Each has an astronomically large range[br]of potential outcomes, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 dependent on the tiniest of differences[br]in position and velocity. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 This behaviour is known as chaotic [br]by physicists, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 and is an important characteristic [br]of n-body systems. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Such a system is still deterministic—[br]meaning there’s nothing random about it. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 If multiple systems start from the exact[br]same conditions, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 they’ll always reach the same result. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 But give one a little shove at the start,[br]and all bets are off. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 That’s clearly relevant for human space[br]missions, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 when complicated orbits need to [br]be calculated with great precision. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Thankfully, continuous advancements[br]in computer simulations 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 offer a number of ways[br]to avoid catastrophe. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 By approximating the solutions with [br]increasingly powerful processors, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 we can more confidently predict the motion[br]of n-body systems on long time-scales. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 And if one body in a group of three is so[br]light it exerts no significant force on the other two, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 the system behaves, with very good [br]approximation, as a two-body system. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 This approach is known as the “restricted [br]three-body problem.” 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 It proves extremely useful in describing,[br]for example, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 an asteroid in the Earth-Sun [br]gravitational field, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 or a small planet in the field of a [br]black hole and a star. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 As for our solar system, you’ll [br]be happy to hear 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 that we can have reasonable confidence[br]in its stability 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 for at least the next several [br]hundred million years. 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 Though if another star, launched from [br]across the galaxy, is on its way to us, 9:59:59.000,9:59:59.000 all bets are off.