1
00:00:01,087 --> 00:00:03,580
So whenever I visit a school
and talk to students,

2
00:00:03,604 --> 00:00:05,747
I always ask them the same thing:

3
00:00:06,754 --> 00:00:08,188
Why do you Google?

4
00:00:08,624 --> 00:00:12,021
Why is Google the search engine
of choice for you?

5
00:00:12,855 --> 00:00:15,407
Strangely enough, I always get
the same three answers.

6
00:00:15,431 --> 00:00:17,470
One, "Because it works,"

7
00:00:17,494 --> 00:00:20,400
which is a great answer;
that's why I Google, too.

8
00:00:20,424 --> 00:00:22,457
Two, somebody will say,

9
00:00:22,481 --> 00:00:25,121
"I really don't know of any alternatives."

10
00:00:25,708 --> 00:00:28,836
It's not an equally great answer
and my reply to that is usually,

11
00:00:28,860 --> 00:00:30,781
"Try to Google the word 'search engine,'

12
00:00:30,805 --> 00:00:33,207
you may find a couple
of interesting alternatives."

13
00:00:33,231 --> 00:00:35,326
And last but not least, thirdly,

14
00:00:35,350 --> 00:00:38,660
inevitably, one student will raise
her or his hand and say,

15
00:00:38,684 --> 00:00:43,867
"With Google, I'm certain to always get
the best, unbiased search result."

16
00:00:45,157 --> 00:00:51,663
Certain to always get the best,
unbiased search result.

17
00:00:53,091 --> 00:00:55,481
Now, as a man of the humanities,

18
00:00:55,505 --> 00:00:57,686
albeit a digital humanities man,

19
00:00:57,710 --> 00:00:59,448
that just makes my skin curl,

20
00:00:59,472 --> 00:01:04,358
even if I, too, realize that that trust,
that idea of the unbiased search result

21
00:01:04,382 --> 00:01:08,237
is a cornerstone in our collective love
for and appreciation of Google.

22
00:01:08,658 --> 00:01:12,916
I will show you why that, philosophically,
is almost an impossibility.

23
00:01:12,940 --> 00:01:16,194
But let me first elaborate,
just a little bit, on a basic principle

24
00:01:16,218 --> 00:01:19,331
behind each search query
that we sometimes seem to forget.

25
00:01:19,851 --> 00:01:21,931
So whenever you set out
to Google something,

26
00:01:21,955 --> 00:01:25,882
start by asking yourself this:
"Am I looking for an isolated fact?"

27
00:01:26,334 --> 00:01:29,495
What is the capital of France?

28
00:01:29,519 --> 00:01:31,944
What are the building blocks
of a water molecule?

29
00:01:31,968 --> 00:01:34,309
Great -- Google away.

30
00:01:34,333 --> 00:01:37,453
There's not a group of scientists
who are this close to proving

31
00:01:37,477 --> 00:01:39,474
that it's actually London and H30.

32
00:01:39,498 --> 00:01:41,869
You don't see a big conspiracy
among those things.

33
00:01:41,893 --> 00:01:43,426
We agree, on a global scale,

34
00:01:43,450 --> 00:01:46,175
what the answers are
to these isolated facts.

35
00:01:46,199 --> 00:01:51,501
But if you complicate your question
just a little bit and ask something like,

36
00:01:51,525 --> 00:01:54,208
"Why is there
an Israeli-Palestine conflict?"

37
00:01:54,978 --> 00:01:57,618
You're not exactly looking
for a singular fact anymore,

38
00:01:57,642 --> 00:01:59,475
you're looking for knowledge,

39
00:01:59,499 --> 00:02:02,077
which is something way more
complicated and delicate.

40
00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:04,149
And to get to knowledge,

41
00:02:04,173 --> 00:02:07,204
you have to bring 10 or 20
or 100 facts to the table

42
00:02:07,228 --> 00:02:10,204
and acknowledge them and say,
"Yes, these are all true."

43
00:02:10,228 --> 00:02:11,902
But because of who I am,

44
00:02:11,926 --> 00:02:14,196
young or old, black or white,
gay or straight,

45
00:02:14,220 --> 00:02:15,831
I will value them differently.

46
00:02:15,855 --> 00:02:17,543
And I will say, "Yes, this is true,

47
00:02:17,567 --> 00:02:19,681
but this is more important
to me than that."

48
00:02:19,705 --> 00:02:21,695
And this is where it becomes interesting,

49
00:02:21,719 --> 00:02:23,865
because this is where we become human.

50
00:02:23,889 --> 00:02:26,885
This is when we start
to argue, to form society.

51
00:02:26,909 --> 00:02:30,266
And to really get somewhere,
we need to filter all our facts here,

52
00:02:30,290 --> 00:02:32,846
through friends and neighbors
and parents and children

53
00:02:32,870 --> 00:02:34,902
and coworkers and newspapers
and magazines,

54
00:02:34,926 --> 00:02:38,006
to finally be grounded in real knowledge,

55
00:02:38,030 --> 00:02:42,077
which is something that a search engine
is a poor help to achieve.

56
00:02:43,284 --> 00:02:49,612
So, I promised you an example
just to show you why it's so hard

57
00:02:49,636 --> 00:02:53,040
to get to the point of true, clean,
objective knowledge --

58
00:02:53,064 --> 00:02:54,532
as food for thought.

59
00:02:54,556 --> 00:02:58,449
I will conduct a couple of simple
queries, search queries.

60
00:02:58,473 --> 00:03:02,513
We'll start with "Michelle Obama,"

61
00:03:02,537 --> 00:03:04,341
the First Lady of the United States.

62
00:03:04,365 --> 00:03:06,094
And we'll click for pictures.

63
00:03:07,007 --> 00:03:09,279
It works really well, as you can see.

64
00:03:09,303 --> 00:03:12,331
It's a perfect search
result, more or less.

65
00:03:12,355 --> 00:03:15,105
It's just her in the picture,
not even the President.

66
00:03:15,664 --> 00:03:16,977
How does this work?

67
00:03:17,837 --> 00:03:19,209
Quite simple.

68
00:03:19,233 --> 00:03:22,448
Google uses a lot of smartness
to achieve this, but quite simply,

69
00:03:22,472 --> 00:03:24,532
they look at two things
more than anything.

70
00:03:24,556 --> 00:03:29,712
First, what does it say in the caption
under the picture on each website?

71
00:03:29,736 --> 00:03:31,951
Does it say "Michelle Obama"
under the picture?

72
00:03:31,975 --> 00:03:34,331
Pretty good indication
it's actually her on there.

73
00:03:34,355 --> 00:03:36,741
Second, Google looks at the picture file,

74
00:03:36,765 --> 00:03:39,797
the name of the file as such
uploaded to the website.

75
00:03:39,821 --> 00:03:42,490
Again, is it called "MichelleObama.jpeg"?

76
00:03:42,839 --> 00:03:45,761
Pretty good indication it's not
Clint Eastwood in the picture.

77
00:03:45,785 --> 00:03:50,050
So, you've got those two and you get
a search result like this -- almost.

78
00:03:50,074 --> 00:03:56,677
Now, in 2009, Michelle Obama
was the victim of a racist campaign,

79
00:03:56,701 --> 00:04:00,716
where people set out to insult her
through her search results.

80
00:04:01,430 --> 00:04:04,132
There was a picture distributed
widely over the Internet

81
00:04:04,156 --> 00:04:06,800
where her face was distorted
to look like a monkey.

82
00:04:06,824 --> 00:04:09,993
And that picture was published all over.

83
00:04:10,017 --> 00:04:13,778
And people published it
very, very purposefully,

84
00:04:13,802 --> 00:04:15,773
to get it up there in the search results.

85
00:04:15,797 --> 00:04:18,752
They made sure to write
"Michelle Obama" in the caption

86
00:04:18,776 --> 00:04:22,953
and they made sure to upload the picture
as "MichelleObama.jpeg," or the like.

87
00:04:22,977 --> 00:04:25,344
You get why -- to manipulate
the search result.

88
00:04:25,368 --> 00:04:26,663
And it worked, too.

89
00:04:26,687 --> 00:04:29,407
So when you picture-Googled
for "Michelle Obama" in 2009,

90
00:04:29,431 --> 00:04:32,818
that distorted monkey picture
showed up among the first results.

91
00:04:32,842 --> 00:04:36,408
Now, the results are self-cleansing,

92
00:04:36,432 --> 00:04:38,185
and that's sort of the beauty of it,

93
00:04:38,209 --> 00:04:41,612
because Google measures relevance
every hour, every day.

94
00:04:41,636 --> 00:04:44,350
However, Google didn't settle
for that this time,

95
00:04:44,374 --> 00:04:47,498
they just thought, "That's racist
and it's a bad search result

96
00:04:47,522 --> 00:04:50,657
and we're going to go back
and clean that up manually.

97
00:04:50,681 --> 00:04:53,613
We are going to write
some code and fix it,"

98
00:04:53,637 --> 00:04:54,884
which they did.

99
00:04:55,454 --> 00:04:59,196
And I don't think anyone in this room
thinks that was a bad idea.

100
00:04:59,789 --> 00:05:00,953
Me neither.

101
00:05:02,802 --> 00:05:05,834
But then, a couple of years go by,

102
00:05:05,858 --> 00:05:08,842
and the world's most-Googled Anders,

103
00:05:08,866 --> 00:05:11,145
Anders Behring Breivik,

104
00:05:11,169 --> 00:05:12,875
did what he did.

105
00:05:12,899 --> 00:05:14,900
This is July 22 in 2011,

106
00:05:14,924 --> 00:05:17,573
and a terrible day in Norwegian history.

107
00:05:17,597 --> 00:05:21,384
This man, a terrorist, blew up
a couple of government buildings

108
00:05:21,408 --> 00:05:24,291
walking distance from where we are
right now in Oslo, Norway

109
00:05:24,315 --> 00:05:26,366
and then he traveled
to the island of Utøya

110
00:05:26,390 --> 00:05:28,613
and shot and killed a group of kids.

111
00:05:29,113 --> 00:05:30,841
Almost 80 people died that day.

112
00:05:32,397 --> 00:05:36,956
And a lot of people would describe
this act of terror as two steps,

113
00:05:36,980 --> 00:05:40,391
that he did two things: he blew up
the buildings and he shot those kids.

114
00:05:40,415 --> 00:05:41,580
It's not true.

115
00:05:42,326 --> 00:05:44,469
It was three steps.

116
00:05:44,493 --> 00:05:46,707
He blew up those buildings,
he shot those kids,

117
00:05:46,731 --> 00:05:50,375
and he sat down and waited
for the world to Google him.

118
00:05:51,227 --> 00:05:53,854
And he prepared
all three steps equally well.

119
00:05:54,544 --> 00:05:57,334
And if there was somebody
who immediately understood this,

120
00:05:57,358 --> 00:05:58,882
it was a Swedish web developer,

121
00:05:58,906 --> 00:06:02,529
a search engine optimization expert
in Stockholm, named Nikke Lindqvist.

122
00:06:02,553 --> 00:06:04,141
He's also a very political guy

123
00:06:04,165 --> 00:06:07,441
and he was right out there
in social media, on his blog and Facebook.

124
00:06:07,465 --> 00:06:08,671
And he told everybody,

125
00:06:08,695 --> 00:06:11,150
"If there's something that
this guy wants right now,

126
00:06:11,174 --> 00:06:13,633
it's to control the image of himself.

127
00:06:14,760 --> 00:06:16,720
Let's see if we can distort that.

128
00:06:17,490 --> 00:06:21,467
Let's see if we, in the civilized world,
can protest against what he did

129
00:06:21,491 --> 00:06:24,808
through insulting him
in his search results."

130
00:06:24,832 --> 00:06:26,019
And how?

131
00:06:26,797 --> 00:06:28,853
He told all of his readers the following,

132
00:06:28,877 --> 00:06:30,741
"Go out there on the Internet,

133
00:06:30,765 --> 00:06:33,660
find pictures of dog poop on sidewalks --

134
00:06:34,708 --> 00:06:36,882
find pictures of dog poop on sidewalks --

135
00:06:36,906 --> 00:06:40,376
publish them in your feeds,
on your websites, on your blogs.

136
00:06:40,400 --> 00:06:43,321
Make sure to write the terrorist's
name in the caption,

137
00:06:43,345 --> 00:06:47,832
make sure to name
the picture file "Breivik.jpeg."

138
00:06:47,856 --> 00:06:51,657
Let's teach Google that that's
the face of the terrorist."

139
00:06:53,552 --> 00:06:54,830
And it worked.

140
00:06:55,853 --> 00:06:58,751
Two years after that campaign
against Michelle Obama,

141
00:06:58,775 --> 00:07:02,041
this manipulation campaign
against Anders Behring Breivik worked.

142
00:07:02,065 --> 00:07:06,527
If you picture-Googled for him weeks after
the July 22 events from Sweden,

143
00:07:06,551 --> 00:07:10,878
you'd see that picture of dog poop
high up in the search results,

144
00:07:10,902 --> 00:07:12,346
as a little protest.

145
00:07:13,425 --> 00:07:17,557
Strangely enough, Google
didn't intervene this time.

146
00:07:18,494 --> 00:07:22,766
They did not step in and manually
clean those search results up.

147
00:07:23,964 --> 00:07:25,680
So the million-dollar question,

148
00:07:25,704 --> 00:07:29,072
is there anything different
between these two happenings here?

149
00:07:29,096 --> 00:07:32,289
Is there anything different between
what happened to Michelle Obama

150
00:07:32,313 --> 00:07:34,378
and what happened
to Anders Behring Breivik?

151
00:07:34,402 --> 00:07:35,686
Of course not.

152
00:07:36,861 --> 00:07:38,332
It's the exact same thing,

153
00:07:38,356 --> 00:07:41,220
yet Google intervened in one case
and not in the other.

154
00:07:41,244 --> 00:07:42,497
Why?

155
00:07:43,283 --> 00:07:46,583
Because Michelle Obama
is an honorable person, that's why,

156
00:07:46,607 --> 00:07:49,523
and Anders Behring Breivik
is a despicable person.

157
00:07:50,142 --> 00:07:51,677
See what happens there?

158
00:07:51,701 --> 00:07:54,956
An evaluation of a person takes place

159
00:07:54,980 --> 00:07:58,766
and there's only one
power-player in the world

160
00:07:58,790 --> 00:08:01,270
with the authority to say who's who.

161
00:08:01,882 --> 00:08:03,623
"We like you, we dislike you.

162
00:08:03,647 --> 00:08:05,686
We believe in you,
we don't believe in you.

163
00:08:05,710 --> 00:08:08,257
You're right, you're wrong.
You're true, you're false.

164
00:08:08,281 --> 00:08:10,086
You're Obama, and you're Breivik."

165
00:08:10,791 --> 00:08:12,791
That's power if I ever saw it.

166
00:08:15,206 --> 00:08:18,858
So I'm asking you to remember
that behind every algorithm

167
00:08:18,882 --> 00:08:20,659
is always a person,

168
00:08:20,683 --> 00:08:23,178
a person with a set of personal beliefs

169
00:08:23,202 --> 00:08:25,727
that no code can ever
completely eradicate.

170
00:08:25,751 --> 00:08:28,185
And my message goes
out not only to Google,

171
00:08:28,209 --> 00:08:31,019
but to all believers in the faith
of code around the world.

172
00:08:31,043 --> 00:08:34,019
You need to identify
your own personal bias.

173
00:08:34,043 --> 00:08:36,056
You need to understand that you are human

174
00:08:36,080 --> 00:08:38,571
and take responsibility accordingly.

175
00:08:39,891 --> 00:08:42,829
And I say this because I believe
we've reached a point in time

176
00:08:42,853 --> 00:08:44,408
when it's absolutely imperative

177
00:08:44,432 --> 00:08:47,649
that we tie those bonds
together again, tighter:

178
00:08:47,673 --> 00:08:50,041
the humanities and the technology.

179
00:08:50,483 --> 00:08:52,288
Tighter than ever.

180
00:08:52,312 --> 00:08:55,651
And, if nothing else, to remind us
that that wonderfully seductive idea

181
00:08:55,675 --> 00:08:58,343
of the unbiased, clean search result

182
00:08:58,367 --> 00:09:01,134
is, and is likely to remain, a myth.

183
00:09:01,984 --> 00:09:03,143
Thank you for your time.

184
00:09:03,167 --> 00:09:05,599
(Applause)