1 00:00:00,731 --> 00:00:04,337 Recently, the leadership team of an American supermarket chain 2 00:00:04,361 --> 00:00:07,817 decided that their business needed to get a lot more efficient. 3 00:00:07,841 --> 00:00:11,696 So they embraced their digital transformation with zeal. 4 00:00:12,174 --> 00:00:16,122 Out went the teams supervising meat, veg, bakery, 5 00:00:16,146 --> 00:00:20,302 and in came an algorithmic task allocator. 6 00:00:20,914 --> 00:00:23,017 Now, instead of people working together, 7 00:00:23,041 --> 00:00:27,282 each employee went, clocked in, got assigned a task, did it, 8 00:00:27,306 --> 00:00:28,884 came back for more. 9 00:00:29,429 --> 00:00:33,156 This was scientific management on steroids, 10 00:00:33,180 --> 00:00:35,262 standardizing and allocating work. 11 00:00:35,580 --> 00:00:37,670 It was super efficient. 12 00:00:38,750 --> 00:00:40,116 Well, not quite, 13 00:00:41,351 --> 00:00:43,677 because the task allocator didn't know 14 00:00:43,701 --> 00:00:46,623 when a customer was going to drop a box of eggs, 15 00:00:46,647 --> 00:00:50,496 couldn't predict when some crazy kid was going to knock over a display, 16 00:00:50,520 --> 00:00:52,436 or when the local high school decided 17 00:00:52,460 --> 00:00:55,095 that everybody needed to bring in coconuts the next day. 18 00:00:55,119 --> 00:00:56,119 (Laughter) 19 00:00:56,143 --> 00:00:58,280 Efficiency works really well 20 00:00:58,304 --> 00:01:01,343 when you can predict exactly what you're going to need. 21 00:01:01,815 --> 00:01:05,091 But when the anomalous or unexpected comes along -- 22 00:01:05,115 --> 00:01:07,447 kids, customers, coconuts -- 23 00:01:07,471 --> 00:01:10,344 well, then efficiency is no longer your friend. 24 00:01:12,074 --> 00:01:14,191 This has become a really crucial issue, 25 00:01:14,215 --> 00:01:16,833 this ability to deal with the unexpected, 26 00:01:17,771 --> 00:01:21,228 because the unexpected is becoming the norm. 27 00:01:21,660 --> 00:01:25,737 It's why experts and forecasters are reluctant to predict anything 28 00:01:25,761 --> 00:01:28,333 more than 400 days out. 29 00:01:29,054 --> 00:01:30,500 Why? 30 00:01:30,524 --> 00:01:32,448 Because over the last 20 or 30 years, 31 00:01:32,472 --> 00:01:36,282 much of the world has gone from being complicated 32 00:01:36,306 --> 00:01:37,602 to being complex -- 33 00:01:38,431 --> 00:01:40,714 which means that yes, there are patterns, 34 00:01:40,738 --> 00:01:43,034 but they don't repeat themselves regularly. 35 00:01:43,440 --> 00:01:47,728 It means that very small changes can make a disproportionate impact. 36 00:01:48,244 --> 00:01:50,910 And it means that expertise won't always suffice, 37 00:01:50,934 --> 00:01:54,568 because the system just keeps changing too fast. 38 00:01:56,192 --> 00:01:58,824 So what that means 39 00:01:58,848 --> 00:02:01,735 is that there's a huge amount in the world 40 00:02:01,759 --> 00:02:04,749 that kind of defies forecasting now. 41 00:02:04,773 --> 00:02:08,603 It's why the Bank of England will say yes, there will be another crash, 42 00:02:08,627 --> 00:02:11,057 but we don't know why or when. 43 00:02:11,807 --> 00:02:14,423 We know that climate change is real, 44 00:02:14,447 --> 00:02:17,523 but we can't predict where forest fires will break out, 45 00:02:17,547 --> 00:02:20,797 and we don't know which factories are going to flood. 46 00:02:21,313 --> 00:02:24,004 It's why companies are blindsided 47 00:02:24,028 --> 00:02:28,897 when plastic straws and bags and bottled water 48 00:02:28,921 --> 00:02:32,226 go from staples to rejects overnight, 49 00:02:33,488 --> 00:02:37,060 and baffled when a change in social mores 50 00:02:37,084 --> 00:02:41,624 turns stars into pariahs and colleagues into outcasts: 51 00:02:43,155 --> 00:02:46,209 ineradicable uncertainty. 52 00:02:47,319 --> 00:02:51,655 In an environment that defies so much forecasting, 53 00:02:51,679 --> 00:02:54,883 efficiency won't just not help us, 54 00:02:54,907 --> 00:03:01,861 it specifically undermines and erodes our capacity to adapt and respond. 55 00:03:04,055 --> 00:03:07,196 So if efficiency is no longer our guiding principle, 56 00:03:07,220 --> 00:03:08,968 how should we address the future? 57 00:03:08,992 --> 00:03:11,444 What kind of thinking is really going to help us? 58 00:03:11,468 --> 00:03:16,615 What sort of talents must we be sure to defend? 59 00:03:17,601 --> 00:03:22,486 I think that, where in the past we used to think a lot about just in time management, 60 00:03:22,510 --> 00:03:26,394 now we have to start thinking about just in case, 61 00:03:26,418 --> 00:03:29,815 preparing for events that are generally certain 62 00:03:29,839 --> 00:03:32,382 but specifically remain ambiguous. 63 00:03:33,110 --> 00:03:38,308 One example of this is the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness, CEPI. 64 00:03:38,332 --> 00:03:42,428 We know there will be more epidemics in future, 65 00:03:42,452 --> 00:03:46,338 but we don't know where or when or what. 66 00:03:46,362 --> 00:03:48,303 So we can't plan. 67 00:03:48,942 --> 00:03:50,593 But we can prepare. 68 00:03:51,257 --> 00:03:57,025 So CEPI's developing multiple vaccines for multiple diseases, 69 00:03:57,866 --> 00:04:01,413 knowing that they can't predict which vaccines are going to work 70 00:04:01,437 --> 00:04:03,457 or which diseases will break out. 71 00:04:03,481 --> 00:04:06,454 So some of those vaccines will never be used. 72 00:04:06,478 --> 00:04:07,950 That's inefficient. 73 00:04:08,794 --> 00:04:10,705 But it's robust, 74 00:04:10,729 --> 00:04:12,664 because it provides more options, 75 00:04:12,688 --> 00:04:17,698 and it means that we don't depend on a single technological solution. 76 00:04:18,566 --> 00:04:21,934 Epidemic responsiveness also depends hugely 77 00:04:21,958 --> 00:04:24,875 on people who know and trust each other. 78 00:04:24,899 --> 00:04:27,686 But those relationships take time to develop, 79 00:04:27,710 --> 00:04:31,935 time that is always in short supply when an epidemic breaks out. 80 00:04:31,959 --> 00:04:37,047 So CEPI is developing relationships, friendships, alliances now 81 00:04:38,197 --> 00:04:41,393 knowing that some of those may never be used. 82 00:04:41,949 --> 00:04:45,102 That's inefficient, a waste of time, perhaps, 83 00:04:45,126 --> 00:04:46,420 but it's robust. 84 00:04:47,161 --> 00:04:50,966 You can see robust thinking in financial services, too. 85 00:04:50,990 --> 00:04:54,744 In the past, banks used to hold much less capital 86 00:04:54,768 --> 00:04:56,991 than they're required to today, 87 00:04:57,015 --> 00:05:00,756 because holding so little capital, being too efficient with it, 88 00:05:00,780 --> 00:05:03,930 is what made the banks so fragile in the first place. 89 00:05:04,581 --> 00:05:10,070 Now, holding more capital looks and is inefficient. 90 00:05:10,094 --> 00:05:16,147 But it's robust, because it protects the financial system against surprises. 91 00:05:17,078 --> 00:05:20,072 Countries that are really serious about climate change 92 00:05:20,096 --> 00:05:23,650 know that they have to adopt multiple solutions, 93 00:05:23,674 --> 00:05:26,702 multiple forms of renewable energy, 94 00:05:26,726 --> 00:05:28,055 not just one. 95 00:05:28,079 --> 00:05:32,939 The countries that are most advanced have been working for years now, 96 00:05:32,963 --> 00:05:36,629 changing their water and food supply and healthcare systems, 97 00:05:36,653 --> 00:05:41,265 because they recognize that by the time they have certain prediction, 98 00:05:41,289 --> 00:05:44,600 that information may very well come too late. 99 00:05:45,458 --> 00:05:49,914 You can take the same approach to trade wars, and many countries do. 100 00:05:49,938 --> 00:05:53,761 Instead of depending on a single huge trading partner, 101 00:05:53,785 --> 00:05:55,889 they try to be everybody's friends, 102 00:05:55,913 --> 00:05:58,251 because they know they can't predict 103 00:05:58,275 --> 00:06:02,029 which markets might suddenly become unstable. 104 00:06:02,053 --> 00:06:06,290 It's time-consuming and expensive, negotiating all these deals, 105 00:06:06,314 --> 00:06:07,472 but it's robust 106 00:06:07,496 --> 00:06:12,907 because it makes their whole economy better defended against shocks. 107 00:06:12,931 --> 00:06:16,610 It's particularly a strategy adopted by small countries 108 00:06:16,634 --> 00:06:20,720 that know they'll never have the market muscle to call the shots, 109 00:06:20,744 --> 00:06:23,898 so it's just better to have too many friends. 110 00:06:25,922 --> 00:06:28,329 But if you're stuck in one of these organizations 111 00:06:28,353 --> 00:06:33,248 that's still kind of captured by the efficiency myth, 112 00:06:33,272 --> 00:06:35,034 how do you start to change it? 113 00:06:36,011 --> 00:06:37,567 Try some experiments. 114 00:06:38,421 --> 00:06:39,787 In the Netherlands, 115 00:06:39,811 --> 00:06:44,525 home care nursing used to be run pretty much like the supermarket: 116 00:06:44,549 --> 00:06:47,327 standardized and prescribed work 117 00:06:47,351 --> 00:06:49,119 to the minute: 118 00:06:49,143 --> 00:06:52,799 nine minutes on Monday, seven minutes on Wednesday, 119 00:06:52,823 --> 00:06:54,537 eight minutes on Friday. 120 00:06:54,561 --> 00:06:56,943 The nurses hated it. 121 00:06:56,967 --> 00:06:59,339 So one of them, Jos de Blok, 122 00:06:59,363 --> 00:07:00,944 proposed an experiment. 123 00:07:01,564 --> 00:07:03,196 Since every patient is different, 124 00:07:03,220 --> 00:07:05,634 and we don't quite know exactly what they'll need, 125 00:07:05,658 --> 00:07:08,345 why don't we just leave it to the nurses to decide? 126 00:07:09,267 --> 00:07:10,637 Sound reckless? 127 00:07:10,661 --> 00:07:12,056 (Laughter) 128 00:07:12,080 --> 00:07:14,200 (Applause) 129 00:07:14,224 --> 00:07:18,358 In his experiment, Jos found the patients got better 130 00:07:18,382 --> 00:07:20,911 in half the time, 131 00:07:20,935 --> 00:07:24,614 and costs fell by 30 percent. 132 00:07:25,920 --> 00:07:30,132 When I asked Jos what had surprised him about his experiment, 133 00:07:30,156 --> 00:07:31,949 he just kind of laughed and he said, 134 00:07:31,973 --> 00:07:35,165 "Well, I had no idea it could be so easy 135 00:07:35,189 --> 00:07:37,779 to find such a huge improvement, 136 00:07:37,803 --> 00:07:41,426 because this isn't the kind of thing you can know or predict 137 00:07:41,450 --> 00:07:44,280 sitting at a desk or staring at a computer screen." 138 00:07:44,734 --> 00:07:48,508 So now this form of nursing has proliferated across the Netherlands 139 00:07:48,532 --> 00:07:50,266 and around the world. 140 00:07:50,290 --> 00:07:53,510 But in every new country it still starts with experiments, 141 00:07:53,534 --> 00:07:58,392 because each place is slightly and unpredictably different. 142 00:07:59,246 --> 00:08:03,196 Of course, not all experiments work. 143 00:08:03,220 --> 00:08:06,276 Jos tried a similar approach to the fire service 144 00:08:06,300 --> 00:08:09,837 and found it didn't work because the service is just too centralized. 145 00:08:09,861 --> 00:08:12,424 Failed experiments look inefficient, 146 00:08:12,448 --> 00:08:15,631 but they're often the only way you can figure out 147 00:08:15,655 --> 00:08:17,929 how the real world works. 148 00:08:18,280 --> 00:08:21,313 So now he's trying teachers. 149 00:08:22,746 --> 00:08:26,493 Experiments like that require creativity 150 00:08:26,517 --> 00:08:28,824 and not a little bravery. 151 00:08:29,613 --> 00:08:31,176 In England -- 152 00:08:31,978 --> 00:08:34,883 I was about to say in the UK, but in England -- 153 00:08:34,907 --> 00:08:36,649 (Laughter) 154 00:08:36,673 --> 00:08:40,987 (Applause) 155 00:08:41,363 --> 00:08:45,449 In England, the leading rugby team, or one of the leading rugby teams, 156 00:08:45,473 --> 00:08:46,833 is Saracens. 157 00:08:47,299 --> 00:08:52,364 The manager and the coach there realized that all the physical training they do 158 00:08:52,388 --> 00:08:55,102 and the data-driven conditioning that they do 159 00:08:55,126 --> 00:08:56,280 has become generic; 160 00:08:56,304 --> 00:08:59,094 really, all the teams do exactly the same thing. 161 00:08:59,683 --> 00:09:02,015 So they risked an experiment. 162 00:09:02,039 --> 00:09:06,284 They took the whole team away, even in match season, 163 00:09:06,308 --> 00:09:07,723 on ski trips 164 00:09:07,747 --> 00:09:11,041 and to look at social projects in Chicago. 165 00:09:11,065 --> 00:09:12,591 This was expensive, 166 00:09:12,615 --> 00:09:14,567 it was time-consuming, 167 00:09:14,591 --> 00:09:16,272 and it could be a little risky 168 00:09:16,296 --> 00:09:20,070 putting a whole bunch of rugby players on a ski slope, right? 169 00:09:20,094 --> 00:09:21,141 (Laughter) 170 00:09:21,165 --> 00:09:24,509 But what they found was that the players came back 171 00:09:24,533 --> 00:09:29,799 with renewed bonds of loyalty and solidarity. 172 00:09:29,823 --> 00:09:33,232 And now when they're on the pitch under incredible pressure, 173 00:09:33,256 --> 00:09:37,682 they manifest what the manager calls "poise" -- 174 00:09:38,515 --> 00:09:42,674 an unflinching, unwavering dedication 175 00:09:42,698 --> 00:09:44,173 to each other. 176 00:09:44,824 --> 00:09:48,577 Their opponents are in awe of this, 177 00:09:48,601 --> 00:09:52,753 but still too in thrall to efficiency to try it. 178 00:09:53,783 --> 00:09:55,815 At a London tech company, Verve, 179 00:09:55,839 --> 00:09:59,182 the CEO measures just about everything that moves, 180 00:09:59,206 --> 00:10:02,230 but she couldn't find anything that made any difference 181 00:10:02,254 --> 00:10:04,381 to the company's productivity. 182 00:10:04,405 --> 00:10:08,160 So she devised an experiment that she calls "Love Week": 183 00:10:08,184 --> 00:10:12,721 a whole week where each employee has to look for really clever, 184 00:10:12,745 --> 00:10:15,024 helpful, imaginative things 185 00:10:15,048 --> 00:10:16,848 that a counterpart does, 186 00:10:16,872 --> 00:10:19,336 call it out and celebrate it. 187 00:10:19,360 --> 00:10:21,477 It takes a huge amount of time and effort; 188 00:10:21,501 --> 00:10:24,538 lots of people would call it distracting. 189 00:10:24,562 --> 00:10:26,794 But it really energizes the business 190 00:10:26,818 --> 00:10:30,456 and makes the whole company more productive. 191 00:10:32,048 --> 00:10:35,354 Preparedness, coalition-building, 192 00:10:35,378 --> 00:10:38,960 imagination, experiments, 193 00:10:38,984 --> 00:10:40,151 bravery -- 194 00:10:41,028 --> 00:10:42,625 in an unpredictable age, 195 00:10:42,649 --> 00:10:48,317 these are tremendous sources of resilience and strength. 196 00:10:48,673 --> 00:10:51,241 They aren't efficient, 197 00:10:52,278 --> 00:10:54,947 but they give us limitless capacity 198 00:10:54,971 --> 00:10:59,466 for adaptation, variation and invention. 199 00:11:00,284 --> 00:11:02,706 And the less we know about the future, 200 00:11:02,730 --> 00:11:08,132 the more we're going to need these tremendous sources 201 00:11:08,156 --> 00:11:13,777 of human, messy, unpredictable skills. 202 00:11:15,336 --> 00:11:19,396 But in our growing dependence on technology, 203 00:11:20,318 --> 00:11:23,668 we're asset-stripping those skills. 204 00:11:24,642 --> 00:11:28,207 Every time we use technology 205 00:11:28,231 --> 00:11:32,423 to nudge us through a decision or a choice 206 00:11:32,447 --> 00:11:34,761 or to interpret how somebody's feeling 207 00:11:34,785 --> 00:11:36,962 or to guide us through a conversation, 208 00:11:36,986 --> 00:11:42,100 we outsource to a machine what we could, can do ourselves, 209 00:11:42,124 --> 00:11:44,648 and it's an expensive trade-off. 210 00:11:45,847 --> 00:11:48,749 The more we let machines think for us, 211 00:11:49,780 --> 00:11:52,649 the less we can think for ourselves. 212 00:11:53,661 --> 00:11:54,814 The more -- 213 00:11:54,838 --> 00:11:59,408 (Applause) 214 00:11:59,432 --> 00:12:04,153 The more time doctors spend staring at digital medical records, 215 00:12:04,177 --> 00:12:07,563 the less time they spend looking at their patients. 216 00:12:08,325 --> 00:12:11,113 The more we use parenting apps, 217 00:12:11,137 --> 00:12:13,294 the less we know our kids. 218 00:12:14,310 --> 00:12:19,396 The more time we spend with people that we're predicted and programmed to like, 219 00:12:19,420 --> 00:12:23,130 the less we can connect with people who are different from ourselves. 220 00:12:23,154 --> 00:12:28,181 And the less compassion we need, the less compassion we have. 221 00:12:29,825 --> 00:12:33,359 What all of these technologies attempt to do 222 00:12:33,383 --> 00:12:40,180 is to force-fit a standardized model of a predictable reality 223 00:12:40,204 --> 00:12:43,572 onto a world that is infinitely surprising. 224 00:12:44,926 --> 00:12:46,278 What gets left out? 225 00:12:46,965 --> 00:12:49,568 Anything that can't be measured -- 226 00:12:50,451 --> 00:12:52,810 which is just about everything that counts. 227 00:12:53,810 --> 00:13:00,775 (Applause) 228 00:13:02,854 --> 00:13:06,941 Our growing dependence on technology 229 00:13:06,965 --> 00:13:10,738 risks us becoming less skilled, 230 00:13:10,762 --> 00:13:12,357 more vulnerable 231 00:13:12,381 --> 00:13:15,332 to the deep and growing complexity 232 00:13:15,356 --> 00:13:16,729 of the real world. 233 00:13:17,951 --> 00:13:23,335 Now, as I was thinking about the extremes of stress and turbulence 234 00:13:23,359 --> 00:13:26,015 that we know we will have to confront, 235 00:13:27,412 --> 00:13:30,364 I went and I talked to a number of chief executives 236 00:13:30,388 --> 00:13:34,556 whose own businesses had gone through existential crises, 237 00:13:34,580 --> 00:13:37,468 when they teetered on the brink of collapse. 238 00:13:38,594 --> 00:13:43,402 These were frank, gut-wrenching conversations. 239 00:13:44,302 --> 00:13:47,579 Many men wept just remembering. 240 00:13:48,214 --> 00:13:49,728 So I asked them: 241 00:13:50,603 --> 00:13:52,668 "What kept you going through this?" 242 00:13:53,328 --> 00:13:55,982 And they all had exactly the same answer. 243 00:13:56,006 --> 00:13:59,116 "It wasn't data or technology," they said. 244 00:13:59,926 --> 00:14:03,311 "It was my friends and my colleagues 245 00:14:03,335 --> 00:14:04,671 who kept me going." 246 00:14:05,173 --> 00:14:10,488 One added, "It was pretty much the opposite of the gig economy." 247 00:14:12,056 --> 00:14:15,790 But then I went and I talked to a group of young, rising executives, 248 00:14:15,814 --> 00:14:17,621 and I asked them, 249 00:14:17,645 --> 00:14:19,187 "Who are your friends at work?" 250 00:14:19,211 --> 00:14:20,989 And they just looked blank. 251 00:14:21,765 --> 00:14:23,615 "There's no time." 252 00:14:23,639 --> 00:14:25,448 "They're too busy." 253 00:14:25,472 --> 00:14:26,910 "It's not efficient." 254 00:14:27,906 --> 00:14:31,478 Who, I wondered, is going to give them 255 00:14:31,502 --> 00:14:36,041 imagination and stamina and bravery 256 00:14:36,065 --> 00:14:37,581 when the storms come? 257 00:14:39,694 --> 00:14:43,337 Anyone who tries to tell you that they know the future 258 00:14:43,361 --> 00:14:45,559 is just trying to own it, 259 00:14:45,583 --> 00:14:48,891 a spurious kind of manifest destiny. 260 00:14:49,794 --> 00:14:52,115 The harder, deeper truth is 261 00:14:53,126 --> 00:14:55,535 that the future is uncharted, 262 00:14:55,559 --> 00:14:57,803 that we can't map it till we get there. 263 00:14:58,734 --> 00:15:00,797 But that's OK, 264 00:15:00,821 --> 00:15:03,838 because we have so much imagination -- 265 00:15:03,862 --> 00:15:05,309 if we use it. 266 00:15:05,333 --> 00:15:10,810 We have deep talents of inventiveness and exploration -- 267 00:15:10,834 --> 00:15:12,611 if we apply them. 268 00:15:12,635 --> 00:15:18,152 We are brave enough to invent things we've never seen before. 269 00:15:19,175 --> 00:15:20,790 Lose those skills, 270 00:15:21,810 --> 00:15:23,532 and we are adrift. 271 00:15:24,384 --> 00:15:27,109 But hone and develop them, 272 00:15:28,498 --> 00:15:30,956 we can make any future we choose. 273 00:15:32,382 --> 00:15:33,556 Thank you. 274 00:15:33,580 --> 00:15:39,666 (Applause)