WEBVTT 00:00:00.660 --> 00:00:02.700 [Windsor Terrace, Brooklyn] 00:00:19.620 --> 00:00:22.520 [New York Close Up] 00:00:29.200 --> 00:00:31.820 [Daniel Gordon, Artist] 00:00:32.320 --> 00:00:35.640 [SOUND OF CELL PHONE VIBRATING] 00:00:36.460 --> 00:00:37.220 --[GORDON] Hello? 00:00:37.220 --> 00:00:39.520 ["Daniel Gordon Looks Back"] 00:00:39.520 --> 00:00:40.820 --Yeah, this is he. 00:00:41.920 --> 00:00:43.200 A few weeks ago, 00:00:43.200 --> 00:00:44.410 I was here working 00:00:44.410 --> 00:00:46.730 and I got a call from somebody 00:00:46.730 --> 00:00:50.719 who had bought a work that I made in 2004 00:00:50.719 --> 00:00:52.140 and the picture was damaged 00:00:52.140 --> 00:00:55.460 and they were wondering if they could have it reprinted. 00:01:00.629 --> 00:01:02.390 So I started looking for the negative 00:01:02.390 --> 00:01:04.510 and it was really great to 00:01:04.510 --> 00:01:06.180 step back twelve years ago 00:01:06.180 --> 00:01:08.220 and see what I was making then. 00:01:09.100 --> 00:01:11.640 It's shockingly kind of similar 00:01:11.650 --> 00:01:13.770 to what I'm doing now. 00:01:17.060 --> 00:01:19.380 I really like that plant-- it’s so weird-- 00:01:19.380 --> 00:01:22.540 and I think that's the clue into the fact that it's 00:01:22.540 --> 00:01:24.340 a constructed tableau. 00:01:25.630 --> 00:01:27.310 Back then I was trying to 00:01:27.310 --> 00:01:29.490 figure out what my voice was 00:01:29.490 --> 00:01:33.830 and I was also just kind of learning how to make stuff physically. 00:01:38.020 --> 00:01:40.560 I really was trying to mimic reality 00:01:40.560 --> 00:01:44.090 which is something that I have become 00:01:44.090 --> 00:01:46.310 less and less interested in. 00:01:49.539 --> 00:01:50.539 Not that there's not 00:01:50.539 --> 00:01:54.000 a version of reality in my pictures now, 00:01:54.000 --> 00:01:59.280 but instead of trying to hide all of that work 00:01:59.770 --> 00:02:02.890 I think it became more interesting to show 00:02:02.890 --> 00:02:04.950 the crumpled paper 00:02:05.500 --> 00:02:07.119 and the handmade stuff 00:02:07.119 --> 00:02:09.450 to show that Photoshop is, like, 00:02:09.450 --> 00:02:12.010 really present in the process. 00:02:12.930 --> 00:02:14.970 Changing a watermelon to be blue 00:02:14.970 --> 00:02:18.510 or a peach to be green... 00:02:18.510 --> 00:02:19.970 Pixelating things. 00:02:20.260 --> 00:02:21.810 Adding noise to stuff. 00:02:23.120 --> 00:02:25.280 [Sound of keys jingling off-screen] 00:02:29.880 --> 00:02:31.720 [Danny moved to a new studio] 00:02:31.720 --> 00:02:33.220 [next to his wife Ruby.] 00:02:33.220 --> 00:02:36.099 [RUBY SKY STILER] I thought we needed more space away from each other, 00:02:36.099 --> 00:02:37.420 but maybe what we really needed 00:02:37.420 --> 00:02:38.900 was some more time together. 00:02:38.900 --> 00:02:40.440 [BOTH LAUGH] 00:02:41.440 --> 00:02:43.519 [GORDON] Ruby probably likes my past work 00:02:43.519 --> 00:02:44.519 more than I do, 00:02:44.519 --> 00:02:45.650 and I like Ruby’s past work 00:02:45.650 --> 00:02:47.010 more than she does. 00:02:47.190 --> 00:02:48.850 It's pretty rare that we would look back 00:02:48.850 --> 00:02:49.850 and we're like, 00:02:49.850 --> 00:02:52.440 "That was so great, what I was doing." 00:02:52.440 --> 00:02:53.180 No. 00:02:53.440 --> 00:02:55.120 [STILER] As I get further from the thing, 00:02:56.120 --> 00:03:00.130 I dislike it more and more. [Ruby Sky Stiler, Artist] 00:03:00.130 --> 00:03:02.250 [GORDON] But then sometimes, you go, 00:03:02.250 --> 00:03:04.049 "It's so long ago..." 00:03:04.049 --> 00:03:06.440 that you really are so detached... 00:03:06.440 --> 00:03:07.480 [STILER] I've heard you say that before 00:03:07.480 --> 00:03:08.989 and I've never felt that. 00:03:08.989 --> 00:03:09.989 [GORDON] You haven’t? 00:03:09.989 --> 00:03:10.669 [STILER] No. 00:03:10.669 --> 00:03:11.980 [GORDON] Every now and then, you... 00:03:11.989 --> 00:03:13.069 ...like what about, um... 00:03:13.380 --> 00:03:14.940 [STILER] Oh God, don't even say a thing. 00:03:14.940 --> 00:03:15.940 [GORDON] What about the vase? 00:03:15.940 --> 00:03:17.020 That was so cool! 00:03:17.020 --> 00:03:17.940 [STILER] Okay, that's the one thing... 00:03:17.940 --> 00:03:18.940 [GORDON] See. 00:03:18.940 --> 00:03:19.940 [STILER] ...that I think is okay. 00:03:19.940 --> 00:03:20.970 [GORDON] Okay, what about, um... 00:03:20.970 --> 00:03:21.810 [STILER] Okay, stop! 00:03:23.380 --> 00:03:26.040 [GORDON] In a lot of ways, the more work you make, 00:03:26.050 --> 00:03:27.800 the more there is to make. 00:03:27.800 --> 00:03:28.800 You make a lot of work 00:03:28.800 --> 00:03:30.580 and then you hang on to a few, 00:03:30.880 --> 00:03:32.819 and I find myself looking back 00:03:32.819 --> 00:03:34.420 at a few pictures 00:03:34.420 --> 00:03:36.260 and wanting to expand on those. 00:03:36.260 --> 00:03:38.519 For example, I found that picture when I was moving. 00:03:38.519 --> 00:03:40.250 It was made around the same time 00:03:40.250 --> 00:03:41.909 as some of these other pictures. 00:03:41.909 --> 00:03:44.060 And I was re-inspired by it 00:03:44.060 --> 00:03:46.310 and wanted to see what it would be like 00:03:46.310 --> 00:03:48.530 if I took that as a starting point. 00:03:54.170 --> 00:03:57.319 I was interested in what happened if I took out 00:03:57.319 --> 00:04:00.500 the identifiable parts of a face. 00:04:00.500 --> 00:04:02.319 Kind of, like, how far I could push 00:04:02.319 --> 00:04:04.039 the idea of a portrait. 00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:07.140 Kind of, how far I could go 00:04:07.150 --> 00:04:09.439 away from what an eye is-- 00:04:09.439 --> 00:04:10.569 or what a nose is, 00:04:10.569 --> 00:04:12.099 or what a mouth is-- 00:04:12.099 --> 00:04:16.119 and still hopefully have it read as a portrait in someway. 00:04:16.130 --> 00:04:18.870 Like, for example, just talking about these pictures. 00:04:19.540 --> 00:04:21.700 They're so new that I don’t know 00:04:21.700 --> 00:04:23.760 the answers to them. 00:04:23.760 --> 00:04:26.970 Like, I think it takes a long time to, 00:04:26.970 --> 00:04:31.150 kind of, understand what it is you're doing. 00:04:34.120 --> 00:04:37.020 [STILER] I've been in a stage for a couple of months 00:04:37.030 --> 00:04:39.470 where, like, I haven’t been able to figure out 00:04:39.470 --> 00:04:41.300 where I want to go. 00:04:41.300 --> 00:04:42.320 And it's, like, 00:04:42.320 --> 00:04:44.860 you have to be delusional to, like, 00:04:44.860 --> 00:04:46.600 keep coming back everyday 00:04:46.600 --> 00:04:50.240 to make more failures. 00:04:51.200 --> 00:04:54.660 I just feel like I'm never satisfied with my work. 00:04:54.660 --> 00:04:55.660 And I think that's good-- 00:04:55.660 --> 00:04:56.810 like, I'm always antsy. 00:04:56.810 --> 00:04:59.230 I just want to keep growing and making things 00:04:59.230 --> 00:05:01.910 that are beyond my expectations 00:05:01.910 --> 00:05:04.670 and making things that are ambitious 00:05:04.670 --> 00:05:06.350 and terrify me. 00:05:15.040 --> 00:05:16.520 [GORDON] I think I'm, like, 00:05:16.520 --> 00:05:18.490 right in between, generationally. 00:05:18.490 --> 00:05:20.820 I lived half my life before the internet 00:05:20.820 --> 00:05:22.230 and half my life after. 00:05:22.230 --> 00:05:23.450 So, I think that there's 00:05:23.450 --> 00:05:25.890 a really interesting conflict between 00:05:25.890 --> 00:05:29.490 the analog versus the digital. 00:05:29.490 --> 00:05:30.830 And I love both. 00:05:31.840 --> 00:05:32.760 [Camera shutter clicks] 00:05:34.520 --> 00:05:35.540 You know, for example, 00:05:35.540 --> 00:05:37.680 like, this really large still life. 00:05:37.680 --> 00:05:40.780 I made a quick selection of watermelon, 00:05:40.780 --> 00:05:42.200 the green jug, 00:05:42.750 --> 00:05:44.730 the blue plum, 00:05:44.730 --> 00:05:47.390 and the orange peach. 00:05:47.960 --> 00:05:50.800 And then created a new canvas, 00:05:50.800 --> 00:05:53.340 and, kind of, stamped those... 00:05:53.340 --> 00:05:56.080 that selection into the new canvas. 00:05:58.470 --> 00:06:00.740 I was curious--and still am curious-- 00:06:00.740 --> 00:06:02.680 if there was a way to make 00:06:02.680 --> 00:06:04.780 non-representational images 00:06:04.780 --> 00:06:07.030 but also, still, in some way, 00:06:07.030 --> 00:06:08.910 are related to my photographs-- 00:06:08.910 --> 00:06:11.060 that they're, kind of, an in-between thing. 00:06:11.060 --> 00:06:12.900 I'm just kind of interested to see 00:06:12.900 --> 00:06:15.460 where the line between a photograph, 00:06:15.460 --> 00:06:18.280 and a painting, and a sculpture lies. 00:06:20.590 --> 00:06:22.370 I think the real question is 00:06:22.370 --> 00:06:24.530 how can you continue to work 00:06:24.530 --> 00:06:27.850 and continue to be truly invested 00:06:27.850 --> 00:06:30.020 and truly interested in what you're doing. 00:06:30.020 --> 00:06:32.630 And, for me, the only way to do that 00:06:32.630 --> 00:06:34.250 is to try new things-- 00:06:34.250 --> 00:06:37.190 to invent new ways of making pictures. 00:06:38.240 --> 00:06:39.900 So that, eventually, 00:06:39.910 --> 00:06:42.020 maybe those questions will have answers. 00:06:42.400 --> 00:06:44.480 But, like, right now, I'm just, kind of, 00:06:45.600 --> 00:06:47.780 asking the questions, I think.