WEBVTT 00:00:01.146 --> 00:00:03.668 I am an astrodynamicist -- 00:00:03.668 --> 00:00:07.965 you know, like that guy Rich Purnell in the movie "The Martian" -- 00:00:07.965 --> 00:00:13.842 and it's my job to study and predict motion of objects in space. 00:00:15.291 --> 00:00:21.814 Currently we track about one percent of hazardous objects on orbit -- 00:00:21.814 --> 00:00:24.955 hazardous to services like location, 00:00:24.955 --> 00:00:26.076 agriculture, 00:00:26.076 --> 00:00:27.217 banking, 00:00:27.217 --> 00:00:29.233 television and communications 00:00:29.233 --> 00:00:30.230 and soon -- 00:00:30.230 --> 00:00:31.366 very soon -- 00:00:31.366 --> 00:00:32.993 even the internet itself. 00:00:33.992 --> 00:00:40.213 Now these services are not protected from roughly half a million objects 00:00:40.213 --> 00:00:45.189 the size of a speck of paint all the way to a school bus in size. 00:00:46.538 --> 00:00:48.396 A speck of paint, 00:00:48.396 --> 00:00:51.275 traveling at the right speed, 00:00:51.275 --> 00:00:52.826 impacting one of these objects, 00:00:52.826 --> 00:00:55.045 could render it absolutely useless. 00:00:56.494 --> 00:01:00.330 But we can't track things as a small as a speck of paint. 00:01:00.827 --> 00:01:04.991 We can only track things as small as say, a smartphone. 00:01:05.801 --> 00:01:10.595 So of this half million objects that we should be concerned about, 00:01:10.595 --> 00:01:14.659 we can only track about 26,000 of these objects, 00:01:14.659 --> 00:01:17.503 and of these 26,000, 00:01:17.503 --> 00:01:20.581 only 2,000 actually work. 00:01:21.905 --> 00:01:24.521 Everything else is garbage. 00:01:26.550 --> 00:01:27.918 That's a lot of garbage. 00:01:28.298 --> 00:01:31.496 To make things a little bit worse, 00:01:31.496 --> 00:01:35.807 most of what we launch into orbit never comes back. 00:01:37.732 --> 00:01:40.231 We send the satellite in orbit, 00:01:40.231 --> 00:01:41.283 it stops working, 00:01:41.283 --> 00:01:43.279 it runs out of fuel, 00:01:43.279 --> 00:01:45.935 and we send something else up ... 00:01:45.935 --> 00:01:48.162 and then we send up something else ... 00:01:48.162 --> 00:01:49.601 and then something else. 00:01:49.811 --> 00:01:51.339 And every once in a while, 00:01:51.339 --> 00:01:53.893 two of these things will collide with each other 00:01:53.893 --> 00:01:55.588 or one of these things will explode 00:01:55.588 --> 00:01:56.807 or even worse, 00:01:56.807 --> 00:02:01.751 somebody might just happen to destroy one of their satellites on orbit, 00:02:01.751 --> 00:02:05.338 and this generates many, many more pieces, 00:02:05.338 --> 00:02:07.980 most of which also never come back. 00:02:08.848 --> 00:02:12.435 Now these things are not just randomly scattered in orbit. 00:02:13.815 --> 00:02:17.084 It turns out that given the curvature of space-time, 00:02:17.084 --> 00:02:19.070 their ideal locations -- 00:02:19.070 --> 00:02:21.080 where we put some of these satellites -- 00:02:21.080 --> 00:02:23.831 think of these as space highways. 00:02:25.444 --> 00:02:27.497 Very much like highways on Earth, 00:02:27.497 --> 00:02:32.100 these space highways can only take up a maximum capacity of traffic 00:02:32.100 --> 00:02:36.073 to sustain space-safe operations. 00:02:37.035 --> 00:02:39.473 Unlike highways on Earth, 00:02:39.473 --> 00:02:41.703 there are actually no space-traffic rules. 00:02:41.703 --> 00:02:43.636 None whatsoever, OK? 00:02:45.762 --> 00:02:46.763 Wow. 00:02:48.503 --> 00:02:50.418 What could possibly go wrong with that? 00:02:50.418 --> 00:02:51.785 (Laughter) 00:02:52.599 --> 00:02:54.921 Now, what would be really nice 00:02:54.921 --> 00:02:58.597 is if we had something like a space-traffic map, 00:02:58.597 --> 00:03:01.220 like a Waze for space that I could look up 00:03:01.220 --> 00:03:03.920 and see what the current traffic conditions are in space, 00:03:03.920 --> 00:03:05.353 maybe even predict these. 00:03:05.842 --> 00:03:08.006 The problem with that, however, 00:03:08.006 --> 00:03:12.437 is that ask five different people, 00:03:12.437 --> 00:03:13.864 "What's going on in orbit? 00:03:13.864 --> 00:03:15.018 Where are things going?" 00:03:15.018 --> 00:03:17.585 and you're probably going to get 10 different answers. 00:03:17.864 --> 00:03:18.871 Why is that? 00:03:19.206 --> 00:03:24.016 It's because information about things on orbit is not commonly shared either. 00:03:25.391 --> 00:03:27.806 So what if we had a globally accessible, 00:03:27.806 --> 00:03:31.178 open and transparent, space-traffic information system 00:03:31.178 --> 00:03:34.217 that can inform the public of where everything is located 00:03:34.217 --> 00:03:36.985 to try to keep space safe and sustainable. 00:03:37.285 --> 00:03:40.968 And what if the system could be used 00:03:40.968 --> 00:03:43.968 to form evidence-based norms of behavior -- 00:03:43.968 --> 00:03:45.540 these space-traffic rules? 00:03:46.018 --> 00:03:48.200 So I developed AstroGraph, 00:03:48.200 --> 00:03:51.902 the world's first crowdsourced, space-traffic monitoring system 00:03:51.902 --> 00:03:53.696 at the University of Texas at Austin. 00:03:54.794 --> 00:04:00.100 AstroGraph combines multiple sources of information from around the globe -- 00:04:00.100 --> 00:04:02.041 government, industry and academia -- 00:04:02.041 --> 00:04:05.989 and represents this in a common framework that anybody can access today. 00:04:07.349 --> 00:04:11.883 Here you can see 26,000 objects orbiting the Earth, 00:04:11.883 --> 00:04:13.736 multiple opinions 00:04:13.736 --> 00:04:16.209 and it gets updated in near real time. 00:04:16.682 --> 00:04:20.296 But back to my problem of space-traffic map: 00:04:20.296 --> 00:04:23.665 what if you only had information from the US government? 00:04:24.118 --> 00:04:27.492 Well, in that case, that's what your space-traffic map would look like. 00:04:28.178 --> 00:04:30.450 But what do the Russians think? 00:04:33.443 --> 00:04:35.393 That looks significantly different. 00:04:36.156 --> 00:04:37.155 Who's right? 00:04:37.155 --> 00:04:38.158 Who's wrong? 00:04:38.158 --> 00:04:39.365 What should I believe? 00:04:39.648 --> 00:04:40.750 What could I trust? 00:04:41.090 --> 00:04:42.477 This is part of the issue. 00:04:44.084 --> 00:04:48.371 In the absence of this framework 00:04:48.371 --> 00:04:51.521 to monitor space-actor behavior, 00:04:51.521 --> 00:04:53.818 to monitor activity in space -- 00:04:53.818 --> 00:04:55.494 where these objects are located -- 00:04:55.494 --> 00:04:58.554 to reconcile these inconsistencies 00:04:58.554 --> 00:05:01.034 and make this knowledge commonplace, 00:05:01.034 --> 00:05:05.799 we actually risk losing the ability 00:05:05.799 --> 00:05:08.799 to use space for humanity's benefit. 00:05:10.493 --> 00:05:11.676 Thank you very much. 00:05:11.676 --> 00:05:14.172 (Applause and cheers)