WEBVTT

00:00:07.187 --> 00:00:11.372
There is something about physics

00:00:11.396 --> 00:00:15.396
that has been really bothering me
since I was a little kid.

00:00:17.110 --> 00:00:18.919
And it's related to a question

00:00:18.943 --> 00:00:22.187
that scientists have been asking
for almost 100 years,

00:00:22.211 --> 00:00:23.380
with no answer.

00:00:25.208 --> 00:00:28.218
How do the smallest things in nature,

00:00:28.242 --> 00:00:30.395
the particles of the quantum world,

00:00:30.419 --> 00:00:33.450
match up with the largest
things in nature --

00:00:33.474 --> 00:00:36.721
planets and stars and galaxies
held together by gravity?

00:00:37.350 --> 00:00:40.123
As a kid, I would puzzle
over questions just like this.

00:00:40.147 --> 00:00:43.039
I would fiddle around
with microscopes and electromagnets,

00:00:43.063 --> 00:00:45.258
and I would read
about the forces of the small

00:00:45.282 --> 00:00:46.616
and about quantum mechanics

00:00:46.640 --> 00:00:50.204
and I would marvel at how well
that description matched up

00:00:50.228 --> 00:00:51.398
to our observation.

00:00:52.320 --> 00:00:53.903
Then I would look at the stars,

00:00:53.927 --> 00:00:56.451
and I would read about how well
we understand gravity,

00:00:56.475 --> 00:00:59.825
and I would think surely,
there must be some elegant way

00:00:59.849 --> 00:01:02.494
that these two systems match up.

00:01:03.121 --> 00:01:04.522
But there's not.

00:01:05.773 --> 00:01:06.933
And the books would say,

00:01:06.957 --> 00:01:10.140
yeah, we understand a lot
about these two realms separately,

00:01:10.164 --> 00:01:12.774
but when we try to link
them mathematically,

00:01:12.798 --> 00:01:14.128
everything breaks.

00:01:14.974 --> 00:01:16.284
And for 100 years,

00:01:16.308 --> 00:01:21.336
none of our ideas as to how to solve
this basically physics disaster,

00:01:21.360 --> 00:01:23.174
has ever been supported by evidence.

00:01:24.471 --> 00:01:26.125
And to little old me --

00:01:26.149 --> 00:01:27.959
little, curious, skeptical James --

00:01:27.983 --> 00:01:30.851
this was a supremely unsatisfying answer.

00:01:32.211 --> 00:01:34.444
So, I'm still a skeptical little kid.

00:01:34.468 --> 00:01:38.278
Flash-forward now
to December of 2015,

00:01:39.129 --> 00:01:41.603
when I found myself smack in the middle

00:01:41.627 --> 00:01:44.567
of the physics world
being flipped on its head.

00:01:46.099 --> 00:01:49.419
It all started when we at CERN
saw something intriguing in our data:

00:01:49.443 --> 00:01:51.717
a hint of a new particle,

00:01:51.741 --> 00:01:55.957
an inkling of a possibly extraordinary
answer to this question.

00:01:57.877 --> 00:02:00.004
So I'm still a skeptical
little kid, I think,

00:02:00.028 --> 00:02:02.161
but I'm also now a particle hunter.

00:02:02.185 --> 00:02:05.648
I am a physicist at CERN's
Large Hadron Collider,

00:02:05.672 --> 00:02:09.143
the largest science
experiment ever mounted.

00:02:09.977 --> 00:02:13.512
It's a 27-kilometer tunnel
on the border of France and Switzerland

00:02:13.536 --> 00:02:15.386
buried 100 meters underground.

00:02:15.410 --> 00:02:16.564
And in this tunnel,

00:02:16.588 --> 00:02:20.541
we use superconducting magnets
colder than outer space

00:02:20.565 --> 00:02:23.626
to accelerate protons
to almost the speed of light

00:02:23.650 --> 00:02:27.527
and slam them into each other
millions of times per second,

00:02:27.551 --> 00:02:30.377
collecting the debris of these collisions

00:02:30.401 --> 00:02:34.372
to search for new, undiscovered
fundamental particles.

00:02:34.827 --> 00:02:37.291
Its design and construction
took decades of work

00:02:37.315 --> 00:02:40.347
by thousands of physicists
from around the globe,

00:02:40.371 --> 00:02:42.912
and in the summer of 2015,

00:02:42.936 --> 00:02:46.360
we had been working tirelessly
to switch on the LHC

00:02:46.384 --> 00:02:50.851
at the highest energy that humans
have ever used in a collider experiment.

00:02:51.835 --> 00:02:54.358
Now, higher energy is important

00:02:54.382 --> 00:02:56.569
because for particles,
there is an equivalence

00:02:56.593 --> 00:02:58.794
between energy and particle mass,

00:02:58.818 --> 00:03:01.279
and mass is just a number
put there by nature.

00:03:02.168 --> 00:03:03.486
To discover new particles,

00:03:03.510 --> 00:03:05.632
we need to reach these bigger numbers.

00:03:05.656 --> 00:03:08.910
And to do that, we have to build
a bigger, higher energy collider,

00:03:08.934 --> 00:03:11.499
and the biggest, highest
energy collider in the world

00:03:11.523 --> 00:03:12.989
is the Large Hadron Collider.

00:03:14.371 --> 00:03:19.270
And then, we collide protons
quadrillions of times,

00:03:19.294 --> 00:03:23.578
and we collect this data very slowly,
over months and months.

00:03:24.913 --> 00:03:29.248
And then new particles might show up
in our data as bumps --

00:03:29.272 --> 00:03:31.717
slight deviations from what you expect,

00:03:31.741 --> 00:03:35.708
little clusters of data points
that make a smooth line not so smooth.

00:03:36.479 --> 00:03:38.200
For example, this bump,

00:03:39.110 --> 00:03:41.643
after months of data-taking in 2012,

00:03:41.667 --> 00:03:43.796
led to the discovery
of the Higgs particle --

00:03:43.820 --> 00:03:45.025
the Higgs boson --

00:03:45.049 --> 00:03:48.414
and to a Nobel Prize
for the confirmation of its existence.

00:03:50.072 --> 00:03:53.630
This jump up in energy in 2015

00:03:54.728 --> 00:03:58.020
represented the best chance
that we as a species had ever had

00:03:58.044 --> 00:03:59.521
of discovering new particles --

00:03:59.545 --> 00:04:01.657
new answers to these
long-standing questions,

00:04:01.681 --> 00:04:04.778
because it was almost
twice as much energy as we used

00:04:04.802 --> 00:04:06.724
when we discovered the Higgs boson.

00:04:06.748 --> 00:04:10.489
Many of my colleagues had been working
their entire careers for this moment,

00:04:10.513 --> 00:04:12.589
and frankly, to little curious me,

00:04:12.613 --> 00:04:15.523
this was the moment
I'd been waiting for my entire life.

00:04:15.547 --> 00:04:17.278
So 2015 was go time.

00:04:18.754 --> 00:04:20.964
So June 2015,

00:04:21.822 --> 00:04:24.481
the LHC is switched back on.

00:04:25.140 --> 00:04:28.017
My colleagues and I held our breath
and bit our fingernails,

00:04:28.041 --> 00:04:30.552
and then finally we saw
the first proton collisions

00:04:30.576 --> 00:04:32.532
at this highest energy ever.

00:04:32.556 --> 00:04:34.632
Applause, champagne, celebration.

00:04:34.656 --> 00:04:38.252
This was a milestone for science,

00:04:38.276 --> 00:04:42.898
and we had no idea what we would find
in this brand-new data.

00:04:46.090 --> 00:04:48.268
And then a few weeks later,
we found a bump.

00:04:50.292 --> 00:04:51.968
It wasn't a very big bump,

00:04:53.052 --> 00:04:55.564
but it was big enough to make
you raise your eyebrow.

00:04:55.588 --> 00:04:57.839
But on a scale of one to 10
for eyebrow raises,

00:04:57.863 --> 00:05:00.473
if 10 indicates that you've
discovered a new particle,

00:05:00.497 --> 00:05:02.224
this eyebrow raise is about a four.

00:05:02.248 --> 00:05:03.398
(Laughter)

00:05:04.532 --> 00:05:09.743
I spent hours, days, weeks
in secret meetings,

00:05:09.767 --> 00:05:12.127
arguing with my colleagues
over this little bump,

00:05:12.151 --> 00:05:15.387
poking and prodding it with our most
ruthless experimental sticks

00:05:15.411 --> 00:05:17.388
to see if it would withstand scrutiny.

00:05:18.088 --> 00:05:21.549
But even after months
of working feverishly --

00:05:21.573 --> 00:05:24.005
sleeping in our offices
and not going home,

00:05:24.029 --> 00:05:26.106
candy bars for dinner,

00:05:26.130 --> 00:05:27.700
coffee by the bucketful --

00:05:27.724 --> 00:05:31.967
physicists are machines
for turning coffee into diagrams --

00:05:31.991 --> 00:05:33.390
(Laughter)

00:05:33.414 --> 00:05:35.950
This little bump would not go away.

00:05:36.804 --> 00:05:38.942
So after a few months,

00:05:38.966 --> 00:05:42.676
we presented our little bump to the world
with a very clear message:

00:05:43.557 --> 00:05:46.268
this little bump is interesting
but it's not definitive,

00:05:46.292 --> 00:05:49.621
so let's keep an eye on it
as we take more data.

00:05:49.972 --> 00:05:52.263
So we were trying to be
extremely cool about it.

00:05:53.563 --> 00:05:55.751
And the world ran with it anyway.

00:05:56.483 --> 00:05:58.115
The news loved it.

00:05:58.835 --> 00:06:01.390
People said it reminded
them of the little bump

00:06:01.414 --> 00:06:04.837
that was shown on the way
toward the Higgs boson discovery.

00:06:04.861 --> 00:06:07.989
Better than that,
my theorist colleagues --

00:06:08.648 --> 00:06:10.965
I love my theorist colleagues --

00:06:10.989 --> 00:06:14.601
my theorist colleagues wrote
500 papers about this little bump.

00:06:14.625 --> 00:06:16.080
(Laughter)

00:06:16.674 --> 00:06:20.640
The world of particle physics
had been flipped on its head.

00:06:21.845 --> 00:06:26.087
But what was it about this particular bump

00:06:26.111 --> 00:06:30.201
that caused thousands of physicists
to collectively lose their cool?

00:06:31.696 --> 00:06:33.132
This little bump was unique.

00:06:34.298 --> 00:06:35.667
This little bump indicated

00:06:35.691 --> 00:06:38.713
that we were seeing an unexpectedly
large number of collisions

00:06:38.737 --> 00:06:42.068
whose debris consisted
of only two photons,

00:06:42.092 --> 00:06:43.336
two particles of light.

00:06:43.360 --> 00:06:44.597
And that's rare.

00:06:45.169 --> 00:06:47.789
Particle collisions are not
like automobile collisions.

00:06:47.813 --> 00:06:49.332
They have different rules.

00:06:49.356 --> 00:06:52.006
When two particles collide
at almost the speed of light,

00:06:52.030 --> 00:06:53.451
the quantum world takes over.

00:06:53.475 --> 00:06:54.735
And in the quantum world,

00:06:54.759 --> 00:06:57.952
these two particles
can briefly create a new particle

00:06:57.976 --> 00:07:00.756
that lives for a tiny fraction of a second

00:07:00.780 --> 00:07:03.661
before splitting into other particles
that hit our detector.

00:07:03.685 --> 00:07:07.090
Imagine a car collision
where the two cars vanish upon impact,

00:07:07.114 --> 00:07:09.383
a bicycle appears in their place --

00:07:09.407 --> 00:07:10.478
(Laughter)

00:07:10.502 --> 00:07:12.963
And then that bicycle explodes
into two skateboards,

00:07:12.987 --> 00:07:14.168
which hit our detector.

00:07:14.192 --> 00:07:15.571
(Laughter)

00:07:15.595 --> 00:07:17.548
Hopefully, not literally.

00:07:17.572 --> 00:07:18.914
They're very expensive.

00:07:20.291 --> 00:07:24.039
Events where only two photons
hit out detector are very rare.

00:07:24.063 --> 00:07:27.785
And because of the special
quantum properties of photons,

00:07:27.809 --> 00:07:31.597
there's a very small number
of possible new particles --

00:07:31.621 --> 00:07:33.118
these mythical bicycles --

00:07:33.142 --> 00:07:35.385
that can give birth to only two photons.

00:07:35.912 --> 00:07:38.748
But one of these options is huge,

00:07:38.772 --> 00:07:41.608
and it has to do with
that long-standing question

00:07:41.632 --> 00:07:44.154
that bothered me as a tiny little kid,

00:07:44.178 --> 00:07:45.538
about gravity.

00:07:48.046 --> 00:07:50.718
Gravity may seem super strong to you,

00:07:50.742 --> 00:07:54.842
but it's actually crazily weak
compared to the other forces of nature.

00:07:54.866 --> 00:07:57.497
I can briefly beat gravity when I jump,

00:07:58.490 --> 00:08:01.333
but I can't pick a proton out of my hand.

00:08:02.563 --> 00:08:05.779
The strength of gravity compared
to the other forces of nature?

00:08:06.580 --> 00:08:08.770
It's 10 to the minus 39.

00:08:08.794 --> 00:08:11.331
That's a decimal with 39 zeros after it.

00:08:11.355 --> 00:08:12.512
Worse than that,

00:08:12.536 --> 00:08:15.563
all of the other known forces of nature
are perfectly described

00:08:15.587 --> 00:08:17.624
by this thing we call the Standard Model,

00:08:17.648 --> 00:08:21.083
which is our current best description
of nature at its smallest scales,

00:08:21.107 --> 00:08:22.263
and quite frankly,

00:08:22.287 --> 00:08:26.464
one of the most successful
achievements of humankind --

00:08:26.488 --> 00:08:30.500
except for gravity, which is absent
from the Standard Model.

00:08:30.524 --> 00:08:31.674
It's crazy.

00:08:32.145 --> 00:08:35.246
It's almost as though most
of gravity has gone missing.

00:08:36.494 --> 00:08:38.160
We feel a little bit of it,

00:08:38.184 --> 00:08:39.861
but where's the rest of it?

00:08:39.885 --> 00:08:41.167
No one knows.

00:08:42.102 --> 00:08:46.506
But one theoretical explanation
proposes a wild solution.

00:08:48.220 --> 00:08:49.559
You and I --

00:08:49.583 --> 00:08:51.161
even you in the back --

00:08:51.185 --> 00:08:53.330
we live in three dimensions of space.

00:08:53.354 --> 00:08:55.911
I hope that's a
non-controversial statement.

00:08:55.935 --> 00:08:57.764
(Laughter)

00:08:57.788 --> 00:09:01.226
All of the known particles also live
in three dimensions of space.

00:09:01.250 --> 00:09:03.440
In fact, a particle is just another name

00:09:03.464 --> 00:09:06.473
for an excitation
in a three-dimensional field;

00:09:06.497 --> 00:09:08.417
a localized wobbling in space.

00:09:09.388 --> 00:09:12.917
More importantly, all the math
that we use to describe all this stuff

00:09:12.941 --> 00:09:16.014
assumes that there are only
three dimensions of space.

00:09:16.038 --> 00:09:19.419
But math is math, and we can play
around with our math however we want.

00:09:19.443 --> 00:09:22.609
And people have been playing around
with extra dimensions of space

00:09:22.633 --> 00:09:23.788
for a very long time,

00:09:23.812 --> 00:09:26.397
but it's always been an abstract
mathematical concept.

00:09:26.421 --> 00:09:29.593
I mean, just look around you --
you at the back, look around --

00:09:29.617 --> 00:09:31.898
there's clearly only
three dimensions of space.

00:09:33.054 --> 00:09:34.613
But what if that's not true?

00:09:36.209 --> 00:09:42.464
What if the missing gravity is leaking
into an extra-spatial dimension

00:09:42.488 --> 00:09:44.444
that's invisible to you and I?

00:09:45.455 --> 00:09:48.549
What if gravity is just as strong
as the other forces

00:09:48.573 --> 00:09:51.714
if you were to view it in this
extra-spatial dimension,

00:09:51.738 --> 00:09:54.638
and what you and I experience
is a tiny slice of gravity

00:09:54.662 --> 00:09:56.559
make it seem very weak?

00:09:58.258 --> 00:09:59.433
If this were true,

00:09:59.457 --> 00:10:02.205
we would have to expand
our Standard Model of particles

00:10:02.229 --> 00:10:06.315
to include an extra particle,
a hyperdimensional particle of gravity,

00:10:06.339 --> 00:10:09.334
a special graviton that lives
in extra-spatial dimensions.

00:10:09.358 --> 00:10:10.823
I see the looks on your faces.

00:10:10.847 --> 00:10:12.666
You should be asking me the question,

00:10:12.690 --> 00:10:16.334
"How in the world are we going to test
this crazy, science fiction idea,

00:10:16.358 --> 00:10:18.849
stuck as we are in three dimensions?"

00:10:18.873 --> 00:10:20.155
The way we always do,

00:10:20.179 --> 00:10:22.318
by slamming together two protons --

00:10:22.342 --> 00:10:23.494
(Laughter)

00:10:23.518 --> 00:10:26.082
Hard enough that
the collision reverberates

00:10:26.106 --> 00:10:28.797
into any extra-spatial dimensions
that might be there,

00:10:28.821 --> 00:10:31.420
momentarily creating
this hyperdimensional graviton

00:10:31.444 --> 00:10:35.824
that then snaps back
into the three dimensions of the LHC

00:10:35.848 --> 00:10:37.670
and spits off two photons,

00:10:38.378 --> 00:10:39.716
two particles of light.

00:10:41.517 --> 00:10:44.427
And this hypothetical,
extra-dimensional graviton

00:10:44.451 --> 00:10:48.158
is one of the only possible,
hypothetical new particles

00:10:48.182 --> 00:10:50.317
that has the special quantum properties

00:10:50.341 --> 00:10:54.577
that could give birth to our little,
two-photon bump.

00:10:56.100 --> 00:11:01.920
So, the possibility of explaining
the mysteries of gravity

00:11:01.944 --> 00:11:05.442
and of discovering extra
dimensions of space --

00:11:05.466 --> 00:11:07.058
perhaps now you get a sense

00:11:07.082 --> 00:11:11.206
as to why thousands of physics geeks
collectively lost their cool

00:11:11.230 --> 00:11:13.112
over our little, two-photon bump.

00:11:13.136 --> 00:11:16.036
A discovery of this type
would rewrite the textbooks.

00:11:16.839 --> 00:11:17.991
But remember,

00:11:18.015 --> 00:11:19.739
the message from us experimentalists

00:11:19.763 --> 00:11:22.002
that actually were doing
this work at the time,

00:11:22.026 --> 00:11:23.180
was very clear:

00:11:23.204 --> 00:11:24.378
we need more data.

00:11:24.402 --> 00:11:25.921
With more data,

00:11:25.945 --> 00:11:29.969
the little bump will either turn into
a nice, crisp Nobel Prize --

00:11:29.993 --> 00:11:31.753
(Laughter)

00:11:31.777 --> 00:11:34.741
Or the extra data will fill in
the space around the bump

00:11:34.765 --> 00:11:36.631
and turn it into a nice, smooth line.

00:11:37.615 --> 00:11:38.833
So we took more data,

00:11:38.857 --> 00:11:41.434
and with five times the data,
several months later,

00:11:41.458 --> 00:11:43.148
our little bump

00:11:43.172 --> 00:11:45.520
turned into a smooth line.

00:11:49.317 --> 00:11:52.801
The news reported on a "huge
disappointment," on "faded hopes,"

00:11:52.825 --> 00:11:55.335
and on particle physicists "being sad."

00:11:55.359 --> 00:11:57.170
Given the tone of the coverage,

00:11:57.194 --> 00:12:00.682
you'd think that we had decided
to shut down the LHC and go home.

00:12:00.706 --> 00:12:01.856
(Laughter)

00:12:02.728 --> 00:12:04.331
But that's not what we did.

00:12:07.157 --> 00:12:09.171
But why not?

00:12:10.575 --> 00:12:13.420
I mean, if I didn't discover
a particle -- and I didn't --

00:12:14.309 --> 00:12:17.338
if I didn't discover a particle,
why am I here talking to you?

00:12:17.362 --> 00:12:19.799
Why didn't I just hang my head in shame

00:12:19.823 --> 00:12:21.047
and go home?

00:12:25.269 --> 00:12:28.620
Particle physicists are explorers.

00:12:29.521 --> 00:12:32.473
And very much of what we do
is cartography.

00:12:33.568 --> 00:12:36.420
Let me put it this way: forget
about the LHC for a second.

00:12:36.444 --> 00:12:39.826
Imagine you are a space explorer
arriving at a distant planet,

00:12:39.850 --> 00:12:41.175
searching for aliens.

00:12:41.199 --> 00:12:42.721
What is your first task?

00:12:44.031 --> 00:12:47.107
To immediately orbit the planet,
land, take a quick look around

00:12:47.131 --> 00:12:49.017
for any big, obvious signs of life,

00:12:49.041 --> 00:12:50.860
and report back to home base.

00:12:50.884 --> 00:12:52.508
That's the stage we're at now.

00:12:53.369 --> 00:12:54.856
We took a first look at the LHC

00:12:54.880 --> 00:12:57.164
for any new, big,
obvious-to-spot particles,

00:12:57.188 --> 00:12:59.138
and we can report that there are none.

00:12:59.731 --> 00:13:02.404
We saw a weird-looking alien bump
on a distant mountain,

00:13:02.428 --> 00:13:04.598
but once we got closer,
we saw it was a rock.

00:13:04.916 --> 00:13:07.556
But then what do we do?
Do we just give up and fly away?

00:13:07.580 --> 00:13:08.867
Absolutely not;

00:13:08.891 --> 00:13:11.196
we would be terrible scientists if we did.

00:13:11.220 --> 00:13:14.833
No, we spend the next couple
of decades exploring,

00:13:14.857 --> 00:13:16.337
mapping out the territory,

00:13:16.361 --> 00:13:18.726
sifting through the sand
with a fine instrument,

00:13:18.750 --> 00:13:20.208
peeking under every stone,

00:13:20.232 --> 00:13:21.786
drilling under the surface.

00:13:22.206 --> 00:13:24.799
New particles can either
show up immediately

00:13:24.823 --> 00:13:26.956
as big, obvious-to-spot bumps,

00:13:26.980 --> 00:13:30.921
or they can only reveal themselves
after years of data taking.

00:13:32.203 --> 00:13:36.613
Humanity has just begun its exploration
at the LHC at this big high energy,

00:13:36.637 --> 00:13:38.428
and we have much searching to do.

00:13:38.452 --> 00:13:44.277
But what if, even after 10 or 20 years,
we still find no new particles?

00:13:45.153 --> 00:13:46.848
We build a bigger machine.

00:13:46.872 --> 00:13:48.446
(Laughter)

00:13:48.470 --> 00:13:50.160
We search at higher energies.

00:13:50.576 --> 00:13:52.146
We search at higher energies.

00:13:53.046 --> 00:13:56.099
Planning is already underway
for a 100-kilometer tunnel

00:13:56.712 --> 00:13:59.688
that will collide particles
at 10 times the energy of the LHC.

00:13:59.712 --> 00:14:02.049
We don't decide where
nature places new particles.

00:14:02.466 --> 00:14:04.112
We only decide to keep exploring.

00:14:04.136 --> 00:14:06.694
But what if, even after
a 100-kilometer tunnel

00:14:06.718 --> 00:14:08.578
or a 500-kilometer tunnel

00:14:08.602 --> 00:14:11.443
or a 10,000-kilometer
collider floating in space

00:14:11.467 --> 00:14:13.045
between the Earth and the Moon,

00:14:13.069 --> 00:14:16.131
we still find no new particles?

00:14:17.697 --> 00:14:20.391
Then perhaps we're doing
particle physics wrong.

00:14:20.415 --> 00:14:22.206
(Laughter)

00:14:22.230 --> 00:14:24.187
Perhaps we need to rethink things.

00:14:25.227 --> 00:14:28.489
Maybe we need more resources,
technology, expertise

00:14:28.513 --> 00:14:30.021
than what we currently have.

00:14:30.710 --> 00:14:34.051
We already use artificial intelligence
and machine learning techniques

00:14:34.075 --> 00:14:35.228
in parts of the LHC,

00:14:35.252 --> 00:14:37.658
but imagine designing
a particle physics experiment

00:14:37.682 --> 00:14:39.351
using such sophisticated algorithms

00:14:39.375 --> 00:14:42.543
that it could teach itself to discover
a hyperdimensional graviton.

00:14:42.567 --> 00:14:43.724
But what if?

00:14:43.748 --> 00:14:45.193
What if the ultimate question:

00:14:45.217 --> 00:14:48.690
What if even artificial intelligence
can't help us answer our questions?

00:14:48.714 --> 00:14:50.825
What if these open questions,
for centuries,

00:14:50.849 --> 00:14:53.518
are destined to be unanswered
for the foreseeable future?

00:14:53.542 --> 00:14:56.471
What if the stuff that's bothered me
since I was a little kid

00:14:56.495 --> 00:14:59.018
is destined to be unanswered
in my lifetime?

00:15:00.495 --> 00:15:01.651
Then that ...

00:15:02.382 --> 00:15:04.476
will be even more fascinating.

00:15:06.244 --> 00:15:09.469
We will be forced to think
in completely new ways.

00:15:10.461 --> 00:15:12.519
We'll have to go back to our assumptions,

00:15:12.543 --> 00:15:14.882
and determine if there was
a flaw somewhere.

00:15:15.501 --> 00:15:18.896
And we'll need to encourage more people
to join us in studying science

00:15:18.920 --> 00:15:21.982
since we need fresh eyes
on these century-old problems.

00:15:22.006 --> 00:15:25.140
I don't have the answers,
and I'm still searching for them.

00:15:25.164 --> 00:15:27.493
But someone -- maybe
she's in school right now,

00:15:27.517 --> 00:15:29.201
maybe she's not even born yet --

00:15:29.883 --> 00:15:33.016
could eventually guide us to see physics
in a completely new way,

00:15:33.040 --> 00:15:37.308
and to point out that perhaps
we're just asking the wrong questions.

00:15:38.212 --> 00:15:40.622
Which would not be the end of physics,

00:15:40.646 --> 00:15:42.052
but a novel beginning.

00:15:43.304 --> 00:15:44.454
Thank you.

00:15:44.478 --> 00:15:47.019
(Applause)