36 STUPID FEMINIST QUESTIONS ANSWERED

(beep)

(screaming)

(jazzy intro)

How does it feel to be

the same sex as Donald Trump?

How does it feel to be

the same sex as Sarah Palin?

How does it feel to be the

same sex as Michelle Bachman?

How does it feel to be the

same sex as anybody you disagree with?

Why does it even matter

whether or not you're the

same gender as somebody else?

I mean, I'm also the same

gender as Abraham Lincoln, Einstein,

and the guy who introduced

chocolate to the Western world.

So what are you even getting

at with this question?

Are you trying to say Donald Trump

is bad, and Donald Trump

is a man, therefore men are bad?

Why do you hate rom-coms?

Or do you just feel like you

need to hate them?

Everybody likes The Notebook,

everybody likes Beyoncé.

It's just a fact.

Men hate romantic comedies

for the same reason you

hate video games with

over-sexualized female characters.

The men in these movies are

always willing to sacrifice

their careers, their dreams,

even their lives to win

the lead females' affection.

Now I don't have any empirical

data to back this up, but

it seems to me that

romantic comedies and

romance movies in general

cause women to have unrealistic

expectations of men and what

love should be like, and these

become the expectations

that men have to live up to,

and it's unfair.

Feminists like to bitch

about poor representation of women

in media intended for men

because they promote body issues

and shit like that

And I agree, to at least, an extent

But it's not any better for men

When we're expected to be Prince Charming,

ready and willing to sacrifice themselves

physically, mentally, and emotionally

And we're called selfish for daring to

have our own desires

or even misogynistic for daring to draw

attention to our own problems.

These movies appeal to the female fantasy

of having a night in shining armor

swear their entire existence to pleasing

them, and thus reinforce these notions

within their target audience of women

like you that you somehow deserve

to have your boyfriends and husbands

give up everything that makes them

who they are and basically dehumanize

themselves for your pleasure and

devote 100% of their time and energy

to you. The fact that some of you

watching this are scoffing at what I

just said only proves my point.

You have fooled yourself into thinking

that I'm somehow the one whose being

selfish when I object to the notion

that men should be expected to cave

into all of your demands, for the sake of

your perverted idealistic conception

of love. And I have no doubts that

some of you will accuse me of being

bitter at some ex girlfriend for saying

that, but I'm not and I will

pre-emptively characterize such an

argument as out cropping of the

very mentality that I'm talking about.

You expect all of your demands to be

catered to, and any man who is unwilling

or unable to cater to them must have

something wrong with them. Us men are

human beings with our own interests and

goals, and it's selfish for you to expect

us to give all that up for you.

But these movies condition you to expect

exactly that. And that is why we hate

romantic comedies. We don't see anything

romantic about them. What we see is the

reinforcement of unfair and unreasonable

expectations about what we should be doing

with our own lives. Also, fuck Beyonce.

"Why do you make women sit around and talk

about men in movies when y'all easily just

sit around and talk about boobs for hours?

One, I don't know, maybe you should be

asking that to people who rent romantic

comedies you like so much, because

those are the movies which have women

sitting around talking about men. Or,

better yet, instead of complaining about

how writers depict women in their movies,

maybe you should try being the change you

want to see and write your own damn movie.

Then you could make the female characters

sit around and talk about whatever you

want. Like how men are oppressing them, or

how men are objectifying them or how men

are such pigs, or how men spread their

legs too far apart on the subway, or how

men hate romantic comedies. There's

nothing stopping you.

Two, you're referring to the Bechdel Test,

which is bullshit. All the Twilight movies

pass the Bechdel Test, but I think you'd

hesitate to call any of those movies

"pro-feminist."

Three, I don't know a single guy who ever

talks about boobs for hours at a time.

I think the only guys who do are medical

students learning how to conduct

mammograms. You want to know what most of

the men I know talk about? Movies, video

games, politics, religion, music, sports,

cars, boats, technology, work, guns,

hunting, places they've been to, people

they've met, and so on. The subject of

boobs actually rarely ever comes up.

Contrary to what you may have been told in

your Women's Studies class, men don't

think about sex constantly. If we did, we

would never have invented the camera

equipment you used to make this video.

Four. If anybody's talking about boobs for

hours at a time, it's feminists. You're

the ones who are always whining about

the designs of fictional characters,

complaining that fat girls' tits are too

big. And in all honesty, the only time I

ever even think about a comic book

character's tits is when I hear a feminist

bring it up. So I think maybe you're

projecting.

"Why do you automatically assume that you

won't like the TV or movies that star a

female lead?"

I don't. In fact, some of my favorite

movies and TV shows have female leads.

I don't know a single man who has ever

scoffed at the notion of watching a movie

or TV show just because it has a female

protagonist. However, I have seen

feminists scoff at anything with a male

lead.

"Why are you surprised when women are

funny?" "I'm probably funnier than you!"

I'm not surprised when women are funny.

There are plenty of funny women out there.

[names not recognized], et cetera.

But I will say that, in general, women are

not as funny as men, and I think most

women won't agree with that statement.

I also think there's a reason for this.

See if you understand what humor is

and how it works, which I'm guessing

you don't because you're feminists,

then you know that the things that make

laugh often have their roots in very dark

subject matter.

To quote the amazing atheist,

"These people who are fucking offended

by rape jokes don't even understand

humor. They don't understand- They

think of humor as like a happy thing,

because humor makes us laugh and laughter

makes us happy, but a lot of the time

they don't seem to notice that what we're

actually laughing at is quite dark and

morbid. Like if you actually look at it

and examine the jokes, and look at the

exaggeration and try to figure out the

mechanics of how the joke works,

why does it work; you're gonna find that

a lot of jokes have their genesis in pain

and suffering. Because laughter is this

great transcendent tool we have, where

we can take something that- that's bitter

and difficult to comprehend or deal with,

and make it something funny.

Like if I take a joke like "How many

police officers does it take change a

light bulb?"

"None, they just beat the room for being

black." you know that joke has it's

genesis in some very serious, very dark

shit. And that joke is not making light

of the fact that people have suffered,

or it's not making light of the fact that

people, you know, marched in the Civil

Rights Movement, or- or that people are

racial discriminated against, or police

brutality. It's not making light of any

of that. What it's doing is it's taking

that pain and it's taking that dark

subject matter, and it's helping us

transcend it for a moment. And view

the absurdity of our circumstance.

Because that is what humor is supposed to

do. Humor at it's best takes the elements

of the world that are dark and horrible,

and shows you there absurdity. It shows

you the absurdity of the human condition.

and that is important."

See men are socially conditioned to not

talk openly and honestly about their

feelings, which I'll talk more about

later, and that's why we cultivate a sense

of humor. The only way we can really talk

about the things that upset us is if

we do it through the filter of comedy.

But women have the clears throat

"privilege" to not be subject to social

conditioning, and so they don't feel the

need to cultivate a sense of humor.

And that's why women, in general, aren't

as funny and men. That isn't to say that

all men are funny, or that all women are

unfunny. It's just that in general men are

funnier than women. I'm sorry but that's

how it is. Also no- I'd rather strongly

doubt that you're funnier than me.

And it's not because you're a women.

Just judging by how you look and talk,

I'm willing to bet that your sense of

humor boils down to saying something rude,

and then following it with "Just kidding".

I mean I'm not the funniest person in

the world but if you think of yourself

as the funny one, you probably lack the

objectivity to realizing that everybody

else in your circle of friends probably

thinks of you as the "annoying one".

Just kidding, actually I'm not.

"Why do you think we're obsessed with you

when we hook up?" "Nine times out of

ten, I just want you to leave too, I'm

busy, I got shit to do."

Probably because you do shit like text

us 50 times in the space of one hour, and

slash our tires when we dump you after you

accuse us of cheating because you saw our

sister's name in our call history. Also

what shit could you possibly have to do?

Pluck your eyebrows to the point

where they're so unnaturally clean around

the edges that they look like they're

drawn on? Spend your husband's money

on more frumpy sweaters? Buy a tub of

Ben & Jerry's and watch Glee? Or write

more questions for men to answer

because you're so lacking in self

awareness that you can't figure out the

answers for yourself?

"Why can't I sleep as many people as I

want to without being judged? When men do

it, they're congratulated"

Go ahead and sleep with as many

people as you want. I don't give a shit,

but once again I don't know anybody who

would. The only time I would care is if I

was dating you, because if you told me

you've been with 20 other guys before

I met you, I would naturally assume that

there was something wrong with you

if you've been in so many relationships

and have them all fail. Not to mention the

fact that your substantially more

likely to be carrying an STD. And I think

it's perfectly reasonable for a woman to

view men who have slept with a lot of

other women the same way. Also who's

congratulating men for sleeping around?

I don't see any guys walking around with

trophies for fucking everyone they've

met. It's not like having sex with easy

women is some kind of achievement.

Furthermore, I would say that most media

portrays men who do that as assholes

who should be looked at with content.

I mean -name not recognized- isn't

exactly portrayed as a model citizen.

By the way studies have found that the

majority of people who slut shame women,

are other women. Maybe you should be

directing this question at them and not

men.

"Why do you consider a woman a tease,

if she does sleep with you after three

dates, but a slut if she sleeps with you

on the first date?"

Why do you consider a man a douchebag if

he doesn't call you back three days after

he meets you, but desperate if he calls

you the next day?

"In what world does no mean yes?"

"No means no."

I don't know anybody who thinks no

means yes. Also this question seems to be

in the spirit of the feminist notion that

all men are potential rapists. Which

simply isn't true. I already talked about

this at length in my other video, "'Teach

men not to rape' is a stupid rhetoric".

Moving on.

"Why do you say that women are too

emotional to be leaders"

whispering: maybe if feminist argued

with logics instead of feelings, people

wouldn't think that.

"Then justify cat calling by saying

'men just can't control themselves'"

I've never heard a man say either, I have

hear women say both though.

"Why do you think that just because

you're nice to me, I owe you my body?"

Why do you think that just because I'm

nice to you that I want your body.

"Sometimes I've been walking down the

street, hysterically crying because my cat

was missing, and a man came up and

was like 'Hey what's up, why are you

crying? Can I talk to you?'

"But I want to continue this, so when

the guy up to you and asked you

how you were doing, did you judge his

intentions, or do you feel like-"

"I was like what the hell is wrong with

you I'm hysterically crying, holding

flyers that say missing cat."

"Wait what if he was checking how you were

doing because you were crying?"

"No he was- It was a catcall, it was like

a 'Hey pretty lady, like what's going on-"

"What if he was trying to be sweet to get

into you, like 'hey pretty lady, why are

you crying?'"

"He's not entitled to my time, honestly"

"If he had not said anything to you, then

he's a dick because he's a guy in society

who saw a girl crying and didn't do

anything."

"But it's a different- If he's saying that

to get my number, that's different that

him coming up and saying 'Whats

wrong, if I see your cat around, I'll let

you know. Like that's a different thing"

"But how is he going to know about your

cat, he saw a girl crying on the street"

"Well, it was just- I was hanging up the

flyers."

"Now I'll now if I ever see a girl crying

on the street, and she's hysterical and

she might've just lost her parents and

has nobody, I shouldn't go up to her

because she might think I'm objectify her"

"She doesn't know you. She doesn't know

you."

"But we're humans, we should care about

each other."

"Of course, of course, but I think you

have to understand what you come off

as to women. They don't know you. It's

like if a brown bear came up and said

hello to you. Like you just have to like-"

"Why would you ever send an unsolicited

dick pic?"

I wouldn't. If you didn't give out your

phone number to the types of guys you meet

in night clubs, you know the type of guys

who go to such clubs for the specific

purpose of meeting women, and who read

books about how to be a pick up artist;

maybe you wouldn't be getting dick pics

from them.

"Why do you feel like it's okay to harrass

women, or make offensive comments about

women, but when somebody does it to your

sister, it's not okay?"

Why do you feel like it's okay to make

these misandrist videos which paint all

men as sexual harassers or rapists, but

when somebody treats your son that way,

it's not okay?

"How does it feel to interrupt me when

I'm in the middle of making a point

during a meetings?"

You make it sound like the only people

who have ever interrupted you are men.

I smell confirmation bias. Hey have you

ever stopped to think that maybe people

interrupt you because they realize you're

talking shit and wasting time after only

two sentences.

"Why do you have to sit with your legs

so wide open?"

"I get that you have balls, but I don't

stand around with my arms wide open

to make room for my boobs."

Maybe that's because your boobs don't get

squished between your arms when you stand

normally with your arms down by your

sides. A man's balls are literally between

his legs, and they do get squished if he

puts his legs together. It's not exactly

an apt comparison. Furthermore, why

do you even care? I don't see you

complaining about women taking up

two seats with their bags.

"Why are women perceived as the weaker

sex? Even though we literally birth you,

like watermelons through like 'this'"

Because physical strength has nothing to

do with your ability to give birth. Women

are, generally speaking, not as physically

strong as men. The average man has about

50% greater upper body strength than the

average woman. I'm sorry but that's just

simple biology. There's also the fact

that men are by in large the one's who go

to war and fight and die to protect you.

Men are the ones who work the dangerous

jobs to make your comfortable lifestyle in

the industrialized world possible.

And historically men are also the ones

who have gone out into the unforgiving

wilderness to kill dangerous animals so

ungrateful entitled women like you could

eat. You as a woman are substantially less

likely to die during your daily activities

and you don't have to worry about being

called a deadbeat for not risking life in

a factory or field for the benefit of

others. Nor do you have to worry about

being told you don't have a real job

because you work with computers or push

pencils in a safe, clean environment.

Women work soft cushy jobs compared to

men and that's why women make only 7% of

workplace fatalities despite making up 47%

of the work force. That is why you're

perceived as the weaker sex. If you

don't want people to see you that way,

then get out of your comfortable air

conditioned studio and go work on a

craving boat on a coal mine. You're

always complaining about employment

discrimination, so go ahead, take the

dirty dangerous jobs and show us all just

how strong and tough you are. And look

I don't begrudge women for working jobs

that don't put them in danger and I will

freely admit that my job isn't

particularly dangerous; but if you're

going to sit there and act like women

are stronger than men just because you can

give birth, something which you have a

0.0002 percent chance of dying from if you

live in the United States, and that's up

from 15 years ago, then you can fuck right

off. By the way passing a kidney stone

hurts more than giving birth. Any woman

who has experienced both will tell you

that, and men get them more often so

blow me.

"Why is it so bad to show your emotions?"

"It means you're human."

Maybe it's because feminists like you

tell us we're misogynists for even

daring to complain about our problems.

Since you're not a man and you don't have

even the slightest inclining of what it's

like to be a man, let me spell it out for

you. Boys are socially conditioned from

the day we learn to talk to not express

our feelings. We are [unknown] constantly

be told to man up and that boys don't cry.

We don't have the privilege of showing

our emotions because if we do, it's a sign

of weakness. To put it simply, us men are

programmed to believe that our own

feelings are invalid, and so we hide them

and we lie about them. We are raised to

expect that if we tell you our feelings,

you will shoot them down. You will tell

us we're wrong for feeling the way we do,

and even if you don't, we still don't want

to tell you our feelings because

we know you'll use them against us.

You're probably thinking that you don't do

that but you do, you do it all the time

and don't even realize it. Ask yourself if

you have ever had an argument

with one of them men in your life and

you told them "If you were a real man..."

If you ever have then you have done

exactly what I'm talking about. See no

woman has ever been told "If you're

a real woman you wouldn't feel this way"

Women have their feelings cultivated and

coddled. You're not only allowed to cry.

you are expected to, and when you do,

people around you give you sympathy and

you are comforted. You are so used to

getting sympathy that you feel entitled

to it. Men don't have that luxury. A man

fully expects to be looked down upon,

and told that his feelings don't matter if

he shows any sign of emotional weakness.

Even by the people he trusts most, because

that is what he has experienced for

his entire life, and you wonder why the

suicide rate for men is four times higher

than it is for women. I know what you're

going to say, you're going to say that

the social conditioning of men to not

show their emotions is part of the

patriarchy, and feminism is fighting to

change that. Good, what heroes you are,

let me give you a little golf clap while

you take a sip from your fucking

'Male Tears' mug while sitting in the

comfort of your safe space, where

men aren't allowed.

"Why are you always trying to prove your

masculinity?"

See my answer to the previous question.

Also wow, how egocentric are you.

You are so certain that the world

revolves around you that you believe that

when a man is acting like a man, that he

must be trying to prove something to you.

Like he couldn't possibly be acting like a

man just because he's, you know, a

fucking man. Why are you constantly trying

to prove your femininity to me? How

bout that?

"Why the fuck isn't it lady like to cuss?

When did words get gendered?"

It's also not considered gentlemen like

to curse. Swearing is generally

considered rude regardless of the gender

of the person who is doing it. Personally

I don't give a shit if you use

profanity. Go right the fuck ahead.

And when did words get genered?

I guess right around the time the

word feminist was invented, which is

at self a gendered word. I'm mean the

invention of feminism is when everything

suddenly became gendered. Like when assert

that interrupting people is somehow a

uniquely male behavior, or that only

women get told not to swear.

"Why is it your first instinct to doubt

women who have been sexually violated or

raped?"

Maybe a false rape accusation weren't

systemically encouraged by feminism,

we wouldn't have a problem. Notice how

this question is phrased, to doubt women

who have been sexually violated or raped.

The more salient question would be,

'Why do you doubt women who claim to have

been sexually violated or raped. And the

answer is because we have this thing

called the presumption of innocence.

That means a person who is accused of a

crime is innocent until proven guilty.

So it's not my first instinct to doubt,

it's my moral imperative to doubt until

evidence is forthcoming. You wouldn't put

somebody in jail just because somebody

accused them of murder nor would you put

them in jail just because somebody accused

them of theft, nor would you put them in

jail because somebody accused them of any

other crime. Why should accusations of

rape be held to a different standard? This

really isn't a difficult concept to

understand, and it both baffles me and

disturbs me how often I see feminists

failing to grasp this. For people who

claim to fight for social justice, you

really don't understand how justice works,

do you? See a man who its accused of rape,

will have his life ruined. That's not even

only if he is convicted, the mere

accusation is enough to cost him his job,

his relationships, his education and

career prospects, his home, his

reputation, and so on. If a woman wants

to ruin a man's life all she has to do is

accuse him of raping her and he will be

put through the ringer by law enforcement

and the media; and even if he is found not

guilty, the damage will have already been

done and the woman who made the false

accusation will get away scot free.

Really it astonishes me that even after

what happened at Duke and the University

of Virginia, that you're still asking

this question. Furthermore, feminists

have abused the word rape to point where

its lost all meaning. Everything is rape.

Its gotten to the point where if a woman

claims she was raped I have to wonder

if she means a guy actually forcibly put

his penis in her, or if she had

consensual sex and just decided to call it

rape when she decided she regretted it the

next morning, or if she's merely

complaining that a guy looked at her in

a way that made her feel uncomfortable.

I mean what even is rape at this point?

According to some feminists, it's rape if

a man changed positions during sex without

forewarning. It's rape if your boyfriend

breaks up with you because you cheated on

him. It's rape if you overhear somebody

calling somebody else a slut.

"I got raped, when my mother called

someone else's daughter a slut."

Really it's your own damn fault that

people are becoming increasingly reluctant

to believe rape accusations, because you

have expanded the definition so broadly,

that nobody even knows when you're really

talking about rape anymore. You did this,

you asked for it, and now you have buyers

remorse. Now let me pose a question to

you, why is it your first instinct to

doubt when a man says he was sexually

violated or raped by a woman.

"Why do you assume a woman is angry

because she's on her period?"

Because women get angry when they're on

their period. It's a scientific fact that

the hormonal changes a woman experiences

during her period cause her to become

irritable. This is called premenstrual

syndrome, or PMS. However, I don't

always assume a woman is angry because

she is on her period. If your boyfriend

thinks that, then maybe it's because

you're not being straight forward with him

and expecting him to be a mind reader.

Maybe you should try telling him why

you're angry. Ever thought about that?

Ever thought about simply telling him that

you're mad that he ate the last

Klondike bar or whatever trivial bullshit

you're getting your panties in twist over.

[mocking voice] "Awe he should just be

able to figure it out"

Yeah like you should be able to figure out

the answers to these stupid questions

you're asking.

"Why do you think women that wear makeup

are false advertising, we can say the same

thing about your dick size."

You actually answered the question

yourself. We consider it false

advertising for the same reason that you

think a man who stuffs the crotch of his

pants is false advertising. If you cover

up all your pimples and scars with makeup

you can't really be surprised when he's

taken aback upon discover that you

don't really look the way you did when you

first met. I mean wouldn't you feel like

you were lied to if you met a guy who

looked well dressed and drove a nice car,

but then you found out that he got his

clothes at goodwill, and he rented that

car with his burger king salary.

"Why isn't it weird that there's a bunch

of old white men sitting in a room,

making legislation about what I can and

can't do with my body?"

Wasn't it a room full of old white men

that decided the Roe v. Wade ruling.

You know, women have had the right to

vote for almost a hundred years now, and

polling data has found that women are more

likely to vote than men; and yet these

old white men keep getting elected.

And I see a lot of you people supporting

Bernie Sanders even though he looks pretty

fuckin old and white to me. Go figure.

Furthermore, why does it even matter that

they're white? Why does their melanin

level matter more than the merit of their

ideas? Wasn't it Martin Luther King Jr.

who once said "I have a dream that my

four little children will one day live in

a nation where they will not be judge by

the color of their skin, but by the

content of their character." For as much

as you people like to accuse other of

being racist, you sure do judge people

based on their race a lot. Oh but it's

not racism when you do it because of

power structures or some other mental

gymnastic bullshit, right? As if whether

or not the prejudice somebody is being

subjected to is institutionalized makes

any difference to them when it happens.

Fuck off. Racism is racism, regardless of

who is doing it to whom. Calling it

something other than racism doesn't

change the fact that it's fucking racism;

And the only people who think otherwise

are racist like you. This mentality that

only certain people can be racist hinges

on the categorization of people based on

their ethnicity, and the ascribing of

attributes to them such as privilege,

based on those racial categories. You

have to make judgements based on race to

make this argument work, you have to make

assumptions and generalization about their

race and origin to make those judgments.

So you have to be racist to use this

argument, how do you not see the problem

with this, how do you not see the problem

with putting people's race before the

merits of their argument and categorizing

people into a hierarchy of consideration

based on their race. How the fuck do you

expect to fight racism with racism, and

then expect people to take you seriously.

Maybe this is the reason why you think

that if somebody thinks that you're

stupid it must be because you're a woman.

You're projecting, you judge other people

based on their race and gender so you

assume other people are doing it to you.

Well I've got news for you, I don't think

you're stupid because you're a woman, I

think you're stupid because you're stupid.

Anyway I'm getting off topic, it's not

like they don't also tell me what I can't

do with my body. For example, I can't take

the palm of my hand and slap some sense

into you, without being considered

assault.

"Do you have a coochie?"

No.

"Why are straight guys so obsessed with

lesbians?"

Why are straight women so obsessed with

gay guys? Or better yet, why are women

so obsessed with lesbians? According to

Porn hub search data for 2014, the number

one thing women search for was lesbian

porn. Proportionately women look up

lesbian porn more than men do.

"How does it feel to get kicked in the

balls?"

How do you think it feels, you dumb

bitch?

"Do you ever get tired of being manly all

the time?"

Do you? You're the one that's dressed like

a lumberjack. To answer the question, no,

not really. It comes naturally to me

since I'm, you know, a man. The fact

that you're asking this question implies

that you sometimes get tired of being

feminine, so do you ever get tired of

being feminine all the time? Is that why

you're dressed like a lumberjack?

Would you like to be a man?

Well you have to pass a test first. Have

you mastered the art of manspreading?

Have you completed your forty hours of

rape training?

"Why are you so afraid of gender

equality?"

I'm not. You are. What I'm afraid of is

gender inequality. Which is what feminist

are actually pushing for. You want

examples? In 2005, Swedish Politian and

co-founder of feminist initiative,

Godrum Schyman, proposed what the media

called a man tax, which would have raised

taxes for men in Sweden. Basing it on the

idea that all men should be held

accountable for all man on women violence.

It should be noted that Schyman was

convicted of tax evasion in 2004, a

year before making this proposal.

In 2010, women's group leaders in Isreal

have unanimously opposed changes to rape

laws that would make it possible for

women to be convicted of rape. They

succeeded and now women in Israel commit

sex act on non-consenting adults or

children who are not old enough to

legally give informed consent, are not

actually being charged with rape, and are

instead charged with lesser crimes. In

2013 Indian feminists successfully

pressured the government to rewrite rape

laws in such a way that only men could be

charged with rape. In 2014, Jessica

Valenti published an article in the

Guardian advocating paying men less than

women. In 2015, York University planned to

hold an international men's day meant to

highlight issues affecting men and boys,

such as the high suicide rate, shorter

life expectancies, and struggles faced in

getting and education. It was canceled

after feminists student, staff, and alumni

protested and held a petition to ban it,

which received almost 200 signatures.

To add insult to injury, Holly Baxter

wrote a condescending article on

Independent.co.uk enlightening readers

why we don't need an international men's

day. You can claim the definition of

feminism is advocating gender equality

all you want, but actions speak louder than

words. And it's really hard to believe the

feminist movement is really a movement

for equality, when you dismiss anyone who

brings up men's issues as misogynists.

You say all men are rapists, you try to

ban men from certain place son college

campuses, you actively fight against

father's rights, undermine the

presumption of innocence when it comes

to rape accusations, and you deny

statistics about male victims of domestic

abuse. As well as protest and disrupt

conferences about male suicide.

"This is what mens' rights looks like"

"This is what mens' rights looks like"

"This is what mens' rights looks like"

All that said, why are you so afraid of

gender equality?

"Why do I deserve to be paid less than

you?"

"In what world does 77 cents equal a

dollar?"

"In what world does 68 cents equal a

dollar?"

"How is that fair?"

After I finished writing my answers to

all these questions, I actually counted

them and realized there are only 33

questions, instead of 36. I just

naturally assumed these four questions

are actually one and answer them as such,

but no. Buzzfeed actually considered this

compound question as a bunch of seperate

questions, in order to bolster their count

for their deceptive, click baiting title.

Like it wasn't bad enough that they're

already not even questions. Anyway, this

has been pointed out countless times by

countless other people, but the wage gap

is bullshit, and when I say it's bullshit

I don't mean that it doesn't exist.

I mean it's bullshit because of the way

it's presented. The observed wage gap it

based on comparing the average income of

men to the average income of women without

considering any variables. Sometimes when

the wage gap is brought up they add women

get paid less for the same jobs, but

that's horseshit. Asking women why they

get paid less than men is like asking why

men are more likely to die in the

workplace than women. It's because men

and women tend to work different jobs;

and just like some jobs are more dangerous

than others, some jobs pay more than

others. And since men tend to work

higher paying jobs, such as those in STEM

fields, men tend to make more money.

And even when you are comparing men and

women working the same jobs, there are

things which factor into why men get paid

more. Such as the fact that men are more

likely to work overtime, or more likely

to ask for raises or promotions, or less

likely to take time off, or more

competitive, or more likely to take risks,

prioritize earnings more than women,

retire at a later age, and all these other

things which studies have found. With all

this taken into consideration, it's no

wonder that men get paid more, men work

more. And really I hate to point out this

obvious bit of common sense, but if

companies could actually get away with

paying women less, don't you think they

would just hire nothing but women to save

money. Do you honestly think that

corporations are such boys clubs that

giving advantages to men is more important

to them than their profits and shareholder

interests. Don't be stupid. And no the

fact that there are so few women in STEM

fields has nothing to do with

discrimination. In fact, surveys have

found that there is a 2 to 1 preference

for female applicants in STEM fields

over equally qualified men. So the reason

that there are so few women in STEM

fields is because few women are interested

in pursuing careers in STEM fields. If you

want more women in STEM fields, then maybe

you shouldn't have wasted your parents

money on a degree in gender studies.

And if you wish to continue pushing this

baseless contention that the patriarchy

is keeping women out of STEM fields, then

explain why the patriarchy isn't stopping

women from dominating certain fields

such as veterinary, medicine, psychology,

pharmacology, and biology. Furthermore,

which is it, 77 cents to a dollar or 68

cents. I've also heard other feminists

claim 72 cents. The fact that you can't

keep your story straight kind of says

something about it. And I'm really

struggling to understand why you thought

including this discrepancy in your video

was a good idea. Maybe you should have

let a man proofread it. (whispering) that

was a joke. I know I have to explain it

because feminists don't understand jokes,

but it was a joke, alright.

"Why are you intimidated by a woman who

makes more money than you? That's

awesome! More money"

I'm not, but since we're making

assumptions, why are you intimidated

by my deep, booming, commanding, yet

sultry baritone voice.

"Why are opiniated women seen as bitches?"

"When opiniated men are seen as bosses."

Opiniated men aren't seen as bosses unless

they actually are somebody's boss.

Otherwise they are just called assholes.

Unless of course their opinions disagree

with you. In which case they are kicked

off of campus, banned from speaking at

events, and told to stop mansplaining.

Maybe that's why opiniated women like you

are seen as bitches.

"Why aren't you speaking up when you hear

your male friends behind closed doors,

make jokes that are offensive to

women?"

Because they're jokes, and they aren't

meant to be taken seriously.

"These people who are fucking offended by

rape jokes don't even understand humor."

If that's not a good enough answer, then

let me ask you this, do you speak up when

your female friends make jokes that are

offensive to men, no? Why not? Oh because

it's empowering right? Fuck off. Also I

thought you said you were probably funnier

than me? You think of yourself as a funny

woman but you don't want people making

jokes that don't cater to your own

personal taste. Stop trying to please

other people's speech, you empty

headed bimbo. (Horn blaring)

"Why are you so afraid of recognizing

your own privilege? Doesn't mean you're a

bad person, just recognizing it and do

something about it."

I just love how you boldly assert that I

have privilege without backing up that

assertion at all. And then pursue to talk

down to me in this condescending tone,

like it's just so obvious it's such an

unassailable argument. (mocking voice)

It doesn't mean you're a bad person.

But I guess being the same gender as

Donald Trump does. To answer your

question, it's because I don't have

privilege, I really don't, but you do.

I defy you name one, just one, legal

privilege that I have, which you don't

also have. Because I can think of several

you have which I don't have. Let me list

ten. Women are almost always granted

custody of children in a divorce by

default unless the man can prove she is

unfit to care for them. See

misrepresentation of gender bias

committee of Massachusetts Supreme Court

by Mark B Rosenthal, this is despite

the fact that children are twice as

likely to be abused by their mother than

they are by their father. According to

page 49 of Child Maltreatment 2013

published by the US Department of Health

and Human Services. Women have more

social safety nets designed for them,

which is why they only make up 24% of

the homeless population. This is in spite

of the fact that 42% of homeless men are

employed, versus only 27% of homeless

women. This is according to page 2 of

"Who's Homeless" published by the National

Coalition for the Homeless, July 2009 and

page 1 of "Single Males: The Homeless

Majority" published by Healing Hands

in June 2001. Women get more lenient

sentences for equivalent crimes. See

"Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal

Criminal Cases" by Sonja B Starr in 2012.

A woman could get a male coworker fired

from his job simply by accusing him of

sexual harassment even without proving it.

It's so easy for a woman to get a man

fired at a malice, and it happens so

often that men are now starting to avoid

women all together in the workplace.

Refusing to mentor or help them.

Kim Elsesser talks about this in her book,

"Sex in the office" 2015. In California, a

woman can declare a man to be the father

of her child and sue him for child

support and it's up to the man to prove

he isn't the father by taking a DNA test.

And he only gets 30 days to do so, if he

doesn't do it in that time, then a court

can declare him responsible for the child

even if he proves he isn't the father

later. A woman can sue a sperm donner for

child support. A woman who gets

pregnant with stolen sperm, can sue the

man she stole it from for child support.

And before you argue that a man should

keep it in his pants so he doesn't want to

be a father, imagine if you heard a

conservative Christian arguing against

abortion by saying 'women should keep

their legs together if they don't want to

be mothers' I think you would lose your

shit. A woman who get pregnant by raping

a man or an underage boy can sue him for

child support. See Hermesmann V Seyer.

A woman could get an abortion in

complete disregard for the wishes of the

father, she doesn't even have to tell

she's seeking an abortion. A woman can

also sue the father for child support if

he wants nothing to do with the child.

So basically a woman can opt out of

parenthood but a man cannot.

Domestic violence against women is

actually taken seriously. Men are always

presumed to be the aggressors in

domestic violence cases. Despite the fact

that CDC statistics have found that more

than 70% of non reciprocated domestic

violence is perpetuated by women.

Even when a man is recognized as a being

a victim of domestic abuse, he is almost

always presumed to be at fault.

People ask 'What did he do to piss her

off?'

So let me pose a question to you, Why are

you so afraid of recognizing your

privilege? It doesn't mean you're a bad

person. Just recognize it and do something

about it. Or don't, I already know you

won't.