WEBVTT
00:00:00.543 --> 00:00:01.693
(beep)
00:00:01.693 --> 00:00:03.409
(screaming)
00:00:03.409 --> 00:00:18.642
(jazzy intro)
00:00:18.642 --> 00:00:20.709
How does it feel to be the
00:00:20.709 --> 00:00:21.825
same sex as Donald Trump?
00:00:21.825 --> 00:00:23.127
How does it feel to be the
00:00:23.127 --> 00:00:24.161
same sex as Sarah Palin?
00:00:24.161 --> 00:00:25.142
How does it feel to be the
00:00:25.142 --> 00:00:26.393
same sex as Michelle Bachman?
00:00:26.393 --> 00:00:27.293
How does it feel to be the
00:00:27.293 --> 00:00:28.027
same sex as anybody
00:00:28.027 --> 00:00:28.960
you disagree with?
00:00:28.960 --> 00:00:29.992
Why does it even matter
00:00:29.992 --> 00:00:31.026
whether or not you're the
00:00:31.026 --> 00:00:31.959
same gender as somebody else?
00:00:31.959 --> 00:00:33.076
I mean, I'm also the same
00:00:33.076 --> 00:00:33.909
gender as Abraham Lincoln, Einstein,
00:00:33.909 --> 00:00:35.143
and the guy who introduced
00:00:35.143 --> 00:00:36.642
chocolate to the Western world.
00:00:36.642 --> 00:00:38.360
So what are you even getting
00:00:38.360 --> 00:00:38.977
at with this question?
00:00:38.977 --> 00:00:40.460
Are you trying to say Donald Trump
00:00:40.460 --> 00:00:41.543
is bad, and Donald Trump
00:00:41.543 --> 00:00:42.860
is a man, therefore men are bad?
00:00:42.860 --> 00:00:44.610
Why do you hate rom-coms?
00:00:44.610 --> 00:00:46.009
Or do you just feel like you
00:00:46.009 --> 00:00:47.076
need to hate them?
00:00:47.076 --> 00:00:48.176
Everybody likes The Notebook,
00:00:48.176 --> 00:00:49.760
everybody likes Beyoncé.
00:00:49.760 --> 00:00:51.243
It's just a fact.
00:00:51.243 --> 00:00:52.509
Men hate romantic comedies
00:00:52.509 --> 00:00:53.459
for the same reason you
00:00:53.459 --> 00:00:54.544
hate video games with
00:00:54.544 --> 00:00:55.826
over-sexualized female characters.
00:00:55.826 --> 00:00:56.743
The men in these movies are
00:00:56.743 --> 00:00:57.892
always willing to sacrifice
00:00:57.892 --> 00:00:58.977
their careers, their dreams,
00:00:58.977 --> 00:01:00.059
even their lives to win
00:01:00.059 --> 00:01:01.060
the lead females' affection.
00:01:01.060 --> 00:01:02.860
Now I don't have any empirical
00:01:02.860 --> 00:01:04.077
data to back this up, but
00:01:04.077 --> 00:01:05.310
it seems to me that
00:01:05.310 --> 00:01:06.293
romantic comedies and
00:01:06.293 --> 00:01:07.409
romance movies in general
00:01:07.409 --> 00:01:08.209
cause women to have unrealistic
00:01:08.209 --> 00:01:08.992
expectations of men and what
00:01:08.992 --> 00:01:10.077
love should be like, and these
00:01:10.077 --> 00:01:10.992
become the expectations
00:01:10.992 --> 00:01:11.977
that men have to live up to,
00:01:11.977 --> 00:01:13.310
and it's unfair.
00:01:13.310 --> 00:01:14.110
Feminists like to bitch
00:01:14.110 --> 00:01:15.127
about poor representation of women
00:01:15.127 --> 00:01:15.909
in media intended for men
00:01:15.909 --> 00:01:16.960
because they promote body issues
00:01:16.960 --> 00:01:17.993
and shit like that
00:01:17.993 --> 00:01:19.509
And I agree, to at least, an extent
00:01:19.509 --> 00:01:21.893
But it's not any better for men
00:01:21.893 --> 00:01:23.410
When we're expected to be Prince Charming,
00:01:23.410 --> 00:01:24.826
ready and willing to sacrifice themselves
00:01:24.826 --> 00:01:27.526
physically, mentally, and emotionally
00:01:27.526 --> 00:01:29.043
And we're called selfish for daring to
00:01:29.043 --> 00:01:30.909
have our own desires
00:01:30.909 --> 00:01:32.158
or even misogynistic for daring to draw
00:01:32.158 --> 00:01:34.059
attention to our own problems.
00:01:34.059 --> 00:01:35.576
These movies appeal to the female fantasy
00:01:35.576 --> 00:01:36.975
of having a night in shining armor
00:01:36.975 --> 00:01:39.193
swear their entire existence to pleasing
00:01:39.193 --> 00:01:40.943
them, and thus reinforce these notions
00:01:40.943 --> 00:01:42.360
within their target audience of women
00:01:42.360 --> 00:01:43.693
like you that you somehow deserve
00:01:43.693 --> 00:01:45.243
to have your boyfriends and husbands
00:01:45.243 --> 00:01:47.309
give up everything that makes them
00:01:47.309 --> 00:01:49.110
who they are and basically dehumanize
00:01:49.110 --> 00:01:50.693
themselves for your pleasure and
00:01:50.693 --> 00:01:52.126
devote 100% of their time and energy
00:01:52.126 --> 00:01:53.877
to you. The fact that some of you
00:01:53.877 --> 00:01:55.260
watching this are scoffing at what I
00:01:55.260 --> 00:01:56.777
just said only proves my point.
00:01:56.777 --> 00:01:58.326
You have fooled yourself into thinking
00:01:58.326 --> 00:02:00.093
that I'm somehow the one who's being
00:02:00.093 --> 00:02:00.761
selfish when I object to the notion
00:02:00.761 --> 00:02:02.360
that men should be expected to cave
00:02:02.360 --> 00:02:03.792
into all of your demands, for the sake of
00:02:03.792 --> 00:02:05.093
your perverted idealistic conception
00:02:05.093 --> 00:02:06.393
of love. And I have no doubts that
00:02:06.393 --> 00:02:08.210
some of you will accuse me of being
00:02:08.210 --> 00:02:09.878
bitter at some ex girlfriend for saying
00:02:09.878 --> 00:02:11.192
that, but I'm not and I will
00:02:11.192 --> 00:02:12.677
pre-emptively characterize such an
00:02:12.677 --> 00:02:14.260
argument as out cropping of the
00:02:14.260 --> 00:02:15.993
very mentality that I'm talking about.
00:02:15.993 --> 00:02:17.610
You expect all of your demands to be
00:02:17.610 --> 00:02:19.359
catered to, and any man who is unwilling
00:02:19.359 --> 00:02:20.509
or unable to cater to them must have
00:02:20.509 --> 00:02:22.110
something wrong with them. Us men are
00:02:22.110 --> 00:02:23.493
human beings with our own interests and
00:02:23.493 --> 00:02:24.994
goals, and it's selfish for you to expect
00:02:24.994 --> 00:02:27.126
us to give all that up for you.
00:02:27.126 --> 00:02:29.043
But these movies condition you to expect
00:02:29.043 --> 00:02:31.260
exactly that. And that is why we hate
00:02:31.260 --> 00:02:33.193
romantic comedies. We don't see anything
00:02:33.193 --> 00:02:35.425
romantic about them. What we see is the
00:02:35.425 --> 00:02:37.910
reinforcement of unfair and unreasonable
00:02:37.910 --> 00:02:39.309
expectations about what we should be doing
00:02:39.309 --> 00:02:42.177
with our own lives. Also, fuck Beyonce.
00:02:42.177 --> 00:02:44.360
"Why do you make women sit around and talk
00:02:44.360 --> 00:02:46.178
about men in movies when y'all easily just
00:02:46.178 --> 00:02:49.093
sit around and talk about boobs for hours?
00:02:49.093 --> 00:02:50.992
One, I don't know, maybe you should be
00:02:50.992 --> 00:02:53.093
asking that to people who write romantic
00:02:53.093 --> 00:02:54.861
comedies you like so much, because
00:02:54.861 --> 00:02:56.410
those are the movies which have women
00:02:56.410 --> 00:02:57.461
sitting around talking about men. Or,
00:02:57.461 --> 00:02:59.228
better yet, instead of complaining about
00:02:59.228 --> 00:03:00.759
how writers depict women in their movies,
00:03:00.759 --> 00:03:01.593
maybe you should try being the change you
00:03:01.593 --> 00:03:03.343
want to see and write your own damn movie.
00:03:03.343 --> 00:03:04.593
Then you could make the female characters
00:03:04.593 --> 00:03:05.710
sit around and talk about whatever you
00:03:05.710 --> 00:03:07.109
want. Like how men are oppressing them, or
00:03:07.109 --> 00:03:08.492
how men are objectifying them or how men
00:03:08.492 --> 00:03:09.710
are such pigs, or how men spread their
00:03:09.710 --> 00:03:11.360
legs too far apart on the subway, or how
00:03:11.360 --> 00:03:13.644
men hate romantic comedies. There's
00:03:13.644 --> 00:03:15.726
nothing stopping you.
00:03:15.726 --> 00:03:17.404
Two, you're referring to the Bechdel Test,
00:03:17.404 --> 00:03:19.159
which is bullshit. All the Twilight movies
00:03:19.159 --> 00:03:20.659
pass the Bechdel Test, but I think you'd
00:03:20.659 --> 00:03:22.443
hesitate to call any of those movies
00:03:22.443 --> 00:03:24.126
"pro-feminist."
00:03:24.126 --> 00:03:25.726
Three, I don't know a single guy who ever
00:03:25.726 --> 00:03:27.810
talks about boobs for hours at a time.
00:03:27.810 --> 00:03:29.476
I think the only guys who do are medical
00:03:29.476 --> 00:03:30.976
students learning how to conduct
00:03:30.976 --> 00:03:32.811
mammograms. You want to know what most of
00:03:32.811 --> 00:03:34.194
the men I know talk about? Movies, video
00:03:34.194 --> 00:03:36.110
games, politics, religion, music, sports,
00:03:36.110 --> 00:03:37.959
cars, boats, technology, work, guns,
00:03:37.959 --> 00:03:39.394
hunting, places they've been to, people
00:03:39.394 --> 00:03:41.443
they've met, and so on. The subject of
00:03:41.443 --> 00:03:43.594
boobs actually rarely ever comes up.
00:03:43.594 --> 00:03:45.693
Contrary to what you may have been told in
00:03:45.693 --> 00:03:47.259
your Women's Studies class, men don't
00:03:47.259 --> 00:03:48.577
think about sex constantly. If we did, we
00:03:48.577 --> 00:03:50.592
would never have invented the camera
00:03:50.592 --> 00:03:51.960
equipment you used to make this video.
00:03:51.960 --> 00:03:54.528
Four. If anybody's talking about boobs for
00:03:54.528 --> 00:03:57.593
hours at a time, it's feminists. You're
00:03:57.593 --> 00:03:59.161
the ones who are always whining about
00:03:59.161 --> 00:04:00.010
the designs of fictional characters,
00:04:00.010 --> 00:04:01.360
complaining that fat girls' tits are too
00:04:01.360 --> 00:04:02.709
big. And in all honesty, the only time I
00:04:02.709 --> 00:04:04.660
ever even think about a comic book
00:04:04.660 --> 00:04:05.993
character's tits is when I hear a feminist
00:04:05.993 --> 00:04:07.410
bring it up. So I think maybe you're
00:04:07.410 --> 00:04:08.360
projecting.
00:04:08.360 --> 00:04:10.492
"Why do you automatically assume that you
00:04:10.492 --> 00:04:11.943
won't like the TV or movies that star a
00:04:11.943 --> 00:04:13.193
female lead?"
00:04:13.193 --> 00:04:14.593
I don't. In fact, some of my favorite
00:04:14.593 --> 00:04:16.560
movies and TV shows have female leads.
00:04:16.560 --> 00:04:18.377
I don't know a single man who has ever
00:04:18.377 --> 00:04:19.809
scoffed at the notion of watching a movie
00:04:19.809 --> 00:04:21.593
or TV show just because it has a female
00:04:21.593 --> 00:04:23.693
protagonist. However, I have seen
00:04:23.693 --> 00:04:25.092
feminists scoff at anything with a male
00:04:25.092 --> 00:04:26.110
lead.
00:04:26.110 --> 00:04:27.777
"Why are you surprised when women are
00:04:27.777 --> 00:04:29.343
funny?" "I'm probably funnier than you!"
00:04:29.343 --> 00:04:30.893
I'm not surprised when women are funny.
00:04:30.893 --> 00:04:32.427
There are plenty of funny women out there.
00:04:32.427 --> 00:04:34.528
[names not recognized], et cetera.
00:04:34.528 --> 00:04:36.560
But I will say that, in general, women are
00:04:36.560 --> 00:04:38.660
not as funny as men, and I think most
00:04:38.660 --> 00:04:39.944
women won't agree with that statement.
00:04:39.944 --> 00:04:41.876
I also think there's a reason for this.
00:04:41.876 --> 00:04:43.960
See if you understand what humor is
00:04:43.960 --> 00:04:46.094
and how it works, which I'm guessing
00:04:46.094 --> 00:04:47.444
you don't because you're feminists,
00:04:47.444 --> 00:04:49.443
then you know that the things that make
00:04:49.443 --> 00:04:50.542
laugh often have their roots in very dark
00:04:50.542 --> 00:04:51.727
subject matter.
00:04:51.727 --> 00:04:53.328
To quote the amazing atheist,
00:04:53.328 --> 00:04:55.060
"These people who are fucking offended
00:04:55.060 --> 00:04:56.410
by rape jokes don't even understand
00:04:56.410 --> 00:04:57.377
humor. They don't understand- They
00:04:57.377 --> 00:04:59.676
think of humor as like a happy thing,
00:04:59.676 --> 00:05:02.160
because humor makes us laugh and laughter
00:05:02.160 --> 00:05:04.193
makes us happy, but a lot of the time
00:05:04.193 --> 00:05:05.627
they don't seem to notice that what we're
00:05:05.627 --> 00:05:07.943
actually laughing at is quite dark and
00:05:07.943 --> 00:05:09.810
morbid. Like if you actually look at it
00:05:09.810 --> 00:05:11.577
and examine the jokes, and look at the
00:05:11.577 --> 00:05:13.043
exaggeration and try to figure out the
00:05:13.043 --> 00:05:15.278
mechanics of how the joke works,
00:05:15.278 --> 00:05:17.226
why does it work; you're gonna find that
00:05:17.226 --> 00:05:19.811
a lot of jokes have their genesis in pain
00:05:19.811 --> 00:05:22.226
and suffering. Because laughter is this
00:05:22.226 --> 00:05:25.226
great transcendent tool we have, where
00:05:25.226 --> 00:05:27.493
we can take something that- that's bitter
00:05:27.493 --> 00:05:30.260
and difficult to comprehend or deal with,
00:05:30.260 --> 00:05:32.126
and make it something funny.
00:05:32.126 --> 00:05:34.177
Like if I take a joke like "How many
00:05:34.177 --> 00:05:37.194
police officers does it take change a
00:05:37.194 --> 00:05:39.326
light bulb?"
00:05:39.326 --> 00:05:41.659
"None, they just beat the room for being
00:05:41.659 --> 00:05:43.710
black." you know that joke has it's
00:05:43.710 --> 00:05:46.926
genesis in some very serious, very dark
00:05:46.926 --> 00:05:49.661
shit. And that joke is not making light
00:05:49.661 --> 00:05:52.227
of the fact that people have suffered,
00:05:52.227 --> 00:05:54.611
or it's not making light of the fact that
00:05:54.611 --> 00:05:56.444
people, you know, marched in the Civil
00:05:56.444 --> 00:05:58.694
Rights Movement, or- or that people are
00:05:58.694 --> 00:06:00.527
racial discriminated against, or police
00:06:00.527 --> 00:06:02.743
brutality. It's not making light of any
00:06:02.743 --> 00:06:04.960
of that. What it's doing is it's taking
00:06:04.960 --> 00:06:06.893
that pain and it's taking that dark
00:06:06.893 --> 00:06:08.575
subject matter, and it's helping us
00:06:08.575 --> 00:06:10.610
transcend it for a moment. And view
00:06:10.610 --> 00:06:13.411
the absurdity of our circumstance.
00:06:13.411 --> 00:06:15.827
Because that is what humor is supposed to
00:06:15.827 --> 00:06:18.093
do. Humor at it's best takes the elements
00:06:18.093 --> 00:06:19.677
of the world that are dark and horrible,
00:06:19.677 --> 00:06:21.843
and shows you there absurdity. It shows
00:06:21.843 --> 00:06:24.011
you the absurdity of the human condition.
00:06:24.011 --> 00:06:26.176
and that is important."
00:06:26.176 --> 00:06:29.028
See men are socially conditioned to not
00:06:29.028 --> 00:06:30.527
talk openly and honestly about their
00:06:30.527 --> 00:06:32.427
feelings, which I'll talk more about
00:06:32.427 --> 00:06:34.394
later, and that's why we cultivate a sense
00:06:34.394 --> 00:06:36.276
of humor. The only way we can really talk
00:06:36.276 --> 00:06:37.843
about the things that upset us is if
00:06:37.843 --> 00:06:39.361
we do it through the filter of comedy.
00:06:39.361 --> 00:06:40.943
But women have the clears throat
00:06:40.943 --> 00:06:43.043
"privilege" to not be subject to social
00:06:43.043 --> 00:06:45.111
conditioning, and so they don't feel the
00:06:45.111 --> 00:06:46.743
need to cultivate a sense of humor.
00:06:46.743 --> 00:06:48.243
And that's why women, in general, aren't
00:06:48.243 --> 00:06:50.344
as funny and men. That isn't to say that
00:06:50.344 --> 00:06:51.960
all men are funny, or that all women are
00:06:51.960 --> 00:06:54.227
unfunny. It's just that in general men are
00:06:54.227 --> 00:06:56.028
funnier than women. I'm sorry but that's
00:06:56.028 --> 00:06:58.494
how it is. Also no- I'd rather strongly
00:06:58.494 --> 00:07:00.294
doubt that you're funnier than me.
00:07:00.294 --> 00:07:02.327
And it's not because you're a woman.
00:07:02.327 --> 00:07:03.443
Just judging by how you look and talk,
00:07:03.443 --> 00:07:04.660
I'm willing to bet that your sense of
00:07:04.660 --> 00:07:05.844
humor boils down to saying something rude,
00:07:05.844 --> 00:07:08.028
and then following it with "Just kidding".
00:07:08.028 --> 00:07:09.945
I mean I'm not the funniest person in
00:07:09.945 --> 00:07:11.361
the world but if you think of yourself
00:07:11.361 --> 00:07:13.027
as the funny one, you probably lack the
00:07:13.027 --> 00:07:14.761
objectivity to realize that everybody
00:07:14.761 --> 00:07:16.409
else in your circle of friends probably
00:07:16.409 --> 00:07:17.794
thinks of you as the "annoying one".
00:07:17.794 --> 00:07:20.293
Just kidding, actually I'm not.
00:07:20.293 --> 00:07:21.878
"Why do you think we're obsessed with you
00:07:21.878 --> 00:07:24.061
when we hook up?" "Nine times out of
00:07:24.061 --> 00:07:25.661
ten, I just want you to leave too, I'm
00:07:25.661 --> 00:07:27.194
busy, I got shit to do."
00:07:27.194 --> 00:07:28.860
Probably because you do shit like text
00:07:28.860 --> 00:07:30.843
us 50 times in the space of one hour, and
00:07:30.843 --> 00:07:32.444
slash our tires when we dump you after you
00:07:32.444 --> 00:07:34.144
accuse us of cheating because you saw our
00:07:34.144 --> 00:07:36.094
sister's name in our call history. Also
00:07:36.094 --> 00:07:38.027
what shit could you possibly have to do?
00:07:38.027 --> 00:07:39.477
Pluck your eyebrows to the point
00:07:39.477 --> 00:07:40.710
where they're so unnaturally clean around
00:07:40.710 --> 00:07:41.894
the edges that they look like they're
00:07:41.894 --> 00:07:43.560
drawn on? Spend your husband's money
00:07:43.560 --> 00:07:45.344
on more frumpy sweaters? Buy a tub of
00:07:45.344 --> 00:07:47.327
Ben & Jerry's and watch Glee? Or write
00:07:47.327 --> 00:07:49.111
more questions for men to answer
00:07:49.111 --> 00:07:50.493
because you're so lacking in self
00:07:50.493 --> 00:07:51.710
awareness that you can't figure out the
00:07:51.710 --> 00:07:52.695
answers for yourself?
00:07:52.695 --> 00:07:54.643
"Why can't I sleep as many people as I
00:07:54.643 --> 00:07:56.644
want to without being judged? When men do
00:07:56.644 --> 00:07:58.210
it, they're congratulated"
00:07:58.210 --> 00:07:59.310
Go ahead and sleep with as many
00:07:59.310 --> 00:08:00.595
people as you want. I don't give a shit,
00:08:00.595 --> 00:08:02.493
but once again I don't know anybody who
00:08:02.493 --> 00:08:04.677
would. The only time I would care is if I
00:08:04.677 --> 00:08:05.944
was dating you, because if you told me
00:08:05.944 --> 00:08:07.477
you've been with 20 other guys before
00:08:07.477 --> 00:08:08.810
I met you, I would naturally assume that
00:08:08.810 --> 00:08:10.211
there was something wrong with you
00:08:10.211 --> 00:08:11.643
if you've been in so many relationships
00:08:11.643 --> 00:08:13.227
and have them all fail. Not to mention the
00:08:13.227 --> 00:08:14.510
fact that your substantially more
00:08:14.510 --> 00:08:16.526
likely to be carrying an STD. And I think
00:08:16.526 --> 00:08:18.094
it's perfectly reasonable for a woman to
00:08:18.094 --> 00:08:19.710
view men who have slept with a lot of
00:08:19.710 --> 00:08:21.160
other women the same way. Also who's
00:08:21.160 --> 00:08:22.894
congratulating men for sleeping around?
00:08:22.894 --> 00:08:24.744
I don't see any guys walking around with
00:08:24.744 --> 00:08:26.177
trophies for fucking everyone they've
00:08:26.177 --> 00:08:27.794
met. It's not like having sex with easy
00:08:27.794 --> 00:08:29.111
women is some kind of achievement.
00:08:29.111 --> 00:08:30.661
Furthermore, I would say that most media
00:08:30.661 --> 00:08:32.426
portrays men who do that as assholes
00:08:32.426 --> 00:08:34.093
who should be looked at with content.
00:08:34.093 --> 00:08:36.078
I mean -name not recognized- isn't
00:08:36.078 --> 00:08:37.595
exactly portrayed as a model citizen.
00:08:37.595 --> 00:08:39.626
By the way studies have found that the
00:08:39.626 --> 00:08:41.544
majority of people who slut shame women,
00:08:41.544 --> 00:08:43.561
are other women. Maybe you should be
00:08:43.561 --> 00:08:44.910
directing this question at them and not
00:08:44.910 --> 00:08:45.843
men.
00:08:45.843 --> 00:08:46.544
"Why do you consider a woman a tease,
00:08:46.544 --> 00:08:48.976
if she does sleep with you after three
00:08:48.976 --> 00:08:51.444
dates, but a slut if she sleeps with you
00:08:51.444 --> 00:08:52.709
on the first date?"
00:08:52.709 --> 00:08:54.394
Why do you consider a man a douchebag if
00:08:54.394 --> 00:08:55.460
he doesn't call you back three days after
00:08:55.460 --> 00:08:57.276
he meets you, but desperate if he calls
00:08:57.276 --> 00:08:58.228
you the next day?
00:08:58.228 --> 00:08:59.627
"In what world does no mean yes?"
00:08:59.627 --> 00:09:00.494
"No means no."
00:09:00.494 --> 00:09:01.977
I don't know anybody who thinks no
00:09:01.977 --> 00:09:04.394
means yes. Also this question seems to be
00:09:04.394 --> 00:09:06.228
in the spirit of the feminist notion that
00:09:06.228 --> 00:09:08.043
all men are potential rapists. Which
00:09:08.043 --> 00:09:09.910
simply isn't true. I already talked about
00:09:09.910 --> 00:09:11.759
this at length in my other video, "'Teach
00:09:11.759 --> 00:09:13.560
men not to rape' is a stupid rhetoric".
00:09:13.560 --> 00:09:14.561
Moving on.
00:09:14.561 --> 00:09:16.094
"Why do you say that women are too
00:09:16.094 --> 00:09:17.710
emotional to be leaders"
00:09:17.710 --> 00:09:19.627
whispering: maybe if feminist argued
00:09:19.627 --> 00:09:22.311
with logics instead of feelings, people
00:09:22.311 --> 00:09:23.911
wouldn't think that.
00:09:23.911 --> 00:09:25.961
"Then justify cat calling by saying
00:09:25.961 --> 00:09:28.078
'men just can't control themselves'"
00:09:28.078 --> 00:09:30.744
I've never heard a man say either, I have
00:09:30.744 --> 00:09:32.226
hear women say both though.
00:09:32.226 --> 00:09:34.078
"Why do you think that just because
00:09:34.078 --> 00:09:35.961
you're nice to me, I owe you my body?"
00:09:35.961 --> 00:09:37.495
Why do you think that just because I'm
00:09:37.495 --> 00:09:38.794
nice to you that I want your body.
00:09:38.794 --> 00:09:42.244
"Sometimes I've been walking down the
00:09:42.244 --> 00:09:43.159
street, hysterically crying because my cat
00:09:43.159 --> 00:09:44.461
was missing, and a man came up and
00:09:44.461 --> 00:09:46.561
was like 'Hey what's up, why are you
00:09:46.561 --> 00:09:47.844
crying? Can I talk to you?'
00:09:47.844 --> 00:09:49.244
"But I want to continue this, so when
00:09:49.244 --> 00:09:50.561
the guy up to you and asked you
00:09:50.561 --> 00:09:51.711
how you were doing, did you judge his
00:09:51.711 --> 00:09:52.995
intentions, or do you feel like-"
00:09:52.995 --> 00:09:54.660
"I was like what the hell is wrong with
00:09:54.660 --> 00:09:56.111
you I'm hysterically crying, holding
00:09:56.111 --> 00:09:57.627
flyers that say missing cat."
00:09:57.627 --> 00:09:59.061
"Wait what if he was checking how you were
00:09:59.061 --> 00:10:00.326
doing because you were crying?"
00:10:00.326 --> 00:10:01.861
"No he was- It was a catcall, it was like
00:10:01.861 --> 00:10:04.311
a 'Hey pretty lady, like what's going on-"
00:10:04.311 --> 00:10:05.744
"What if he was trying to be sweet to get
00:10:05.744 --> 00:10:07.394
into you, like 'hey pretty lady, why are
00:10:07.394 --> 00:10:08.576
you crying?'"
00:10:08.576 --> 00:10:10.477
"He's not entitled to my time, honestly"
00:10:10.477 --> 00:10:13.093
"If he had not said anything to you, then
00:10:13.093 --> 00:10:14.961
he's a dick because he's a guy in society
00:10:14.961 --> 00:10:16.794
who saw a girl crying and didn't do
00:10:16.794 --> 00:10:18.444
anything."
00:10:18.444 --> 00:10:19.610
"But it's a different- If he's saying that
00:10:19.610 --> 00:10:20.694
to get my number, that's different that
00:10:20.694 --> 00:10:22.145
him coming up and saying 'Whats
00:10:22.145 --> 00:10:23.645
wrong, if I see your cat around, I'll let
00:10:23.645 --> 00:10:25.510
you know. Like that's a different thing"
00:10:25.510 --> 00:10:27.043
"But how is he going to know about your
00:10:27.043 --> 00:10:28.145
cat, he saw a girl crying on the street"
00:10:28.145 --> 00:10:29.178
"Well, it was just- I was hanging up the
00:10:29.178 --> 00:10:30.177
flyers."
00:10:30.177 --> 00:10:31.693
"Now I'll now if I ever see a girl crying
00:10:31.693 --> 00:10:33.512
on the street, and she's hysterical and
00:10:33.512 --> 00:10:35.127
she might've just lost her parents and
00:10:35.127 --> 00:10:36.812
has nobody, I shouldn't go up to her
00:10:36.812 --> 00:10:38.626
because she might think I'm objectify her"
00:10:38.626 --> 00:10:40.178
"She doesn't know you. She doesn't know
00:10:40.178 --> 00:10:40.927
you."
00:10:40.927 --> 00:10:41.728
"But we're humans, we should care about
00:10:41.728 --> 00:10:43.311
each other."
00:10:43.311 --> 00:10:44.411
"Of course, of course, but I think you
00:10:44.411 --> 00:10:45.329
have to understand what you come off
00:10:45.329 --> 00:10:47.459
as to women. They don't know you. It's
00:10:47.459 --> 00:10:48.978
like if a brown bear came up and said
00:10:48.978 --> 00:10:51.010
hello to you. Like you just have to like-"
00:10:51.010 --> 00:10:53.928
"Why would you ever send an unsolicited
00:10:53.928 --> 00:10:55.212
dick pic?"
00:10:55.212 --> 00:10:56.428
I wouldn't. If you didn't give out your
00:10:56.428 --> 00:10:58.045
phone number to the types of guys you meet
00:10:58.045 --> 00:11:00.410
in night clubs, you know the type of guys
00:11:00.410 --> 00:11:01.878
who go to such clubs for the specific
00:11:01.878 --> 00:11:03.511
purpose of meeting women, and who read
00:11:03.511 --> 00:11:05.028
books about how to be a pick up artist;
00:11:05.028 --> 00:11:06.477
maybe you wouldn't be getting dick pics
00:11:06.477 --> 00:11:07.361
from them.
00:11:07.361 --> 00:11:08.344
"Why do you feel like it's okay to harrass
00:11:08.344 --> 00:11:09.911
women, or make offensive comments about
00:11:09.911 --> 00:11:13.077
women, but when somebody does it to your
00:11:13.077 --> 00:11:14.494
sister, it's not okay?"
00:11:14.494 --> 00:11:15.995
Why do you feel like it's okay to make
00:11:15.995 --> 00:11:17.578
these misandrist videos which paint all
00:11:17.578 --> 00:11:19.445
men as sexual harassers or rapists, but
00:11:19.445 --> 00:11:20.861
when somebody treats your son that way,
00:11:20.861 --> 00:11:22.094
it's not okay?
00:11:22.094 --> 00:11:23.628
"How does it feel to interrupt me when
00:11:23.628 --> 00:11:24.977
I'm in the middle of making a point
00:11:24.977 --> 00:11:26.094
during a meetings?"
00:11:26.094 --> 00:11:27.361
You make it sound like the only people
00:11:27.361 --> 00:11:28.527
who have ever interrupted you are men.
00:11:28.527 --> 00:11:30.195
I smell confirmation bias. Hey have you
00:11:30.195 --> 00:11:31.278
ever stopped to think that maybe people
00:11:31.278 --> 00:11:33.627
interrupt you because they realize you're
00:11:33.627 --> 00:11:35.461
talking shit and wasting time after only
00:11:35.461 --> 00:11:36.328
two sentences.
00:11:36.328 --> 00:11:37.795
"Why do you have to sit with your legs
00:11:37.795 --> 00:11:38.777
so wide open?"
00:11:38.777 --> 00:11:40.994
"I get that you have balls, but I don't
00:11:40.994 --> 00:11:43.227
stand around with my arms wide open
00:11:43.227 --> 00:11:44.661
to make room for my boobs."
00:11:44.661 --> 00:11:46.295
Maybe that's because your boobs don't get
00:11:46.295 --> 00:11:47.812
squished between your arms when you stand
00:11:47.812 --> 00:11:49.162
normally with your arms down by your
00:11:49.162 --> 00:11:51.361
sides. A man's balls are literally between
00:11:51.361 --> 00:11:52.577
his legs, and they do get squished if he
00:11:52.577 --> 00:11:54.162
puts his legs together. It's not exactly
00:11:54.162 --> 00:11:56.877
an apt comparison. Furthermore, why
00:11:56.877 --> 00:11:58.427
do you even care? I don't see you
00:11:58.427 --> 00:11:59.927
complaining about women taking up
00:11:59.927 --> 00:12:01.462
two seats with their bags.
00:12:01.462 --> 00:12:02.561
"Why are women perceived as the weaker
00:12:02.561 --> 00:12:03.110
sex? Even though we literally birth you,
00:12:03.110 --> 00:12:08.729
like watermelons through like 'this'"
00:12:08.729 --> 00:12:10.178
Because physical strength has nothing to
00:12:10.178 --> 00:12:11.578
do with your ability to give birth. Women
00:12:11.578 --> 00:12:13.361
are, generally speaking, not as physically
00:12:13.361 --> 00:12:16.045
strong as men. The average man has about
00:12:16.045 --> 00:12:18.227
50% greater upper body strength than the
00:12:18.227 --> 00:12:20.194
average woman. I'm sorry but that's just
00:12:20.194 --> 00:12:22.343
simple biology. There's also the fact
00:12:22.343 --> 00:12:24.227
that men are by in large the one's who go
00:12:24.227 --> 00:12:26.078
to war and fight and die to protect you.
00:12:26.078 --> 00:12:27.578
Men are the ones who work the dangerous
00:12:27.578 --> 00:12:29.327
jobs to make your comfortable lifestyle in
00:12:29.327 --> 00:12:30.611
the industrialized world possible.
00:12:30.611 --> 00:12:32.478
And historically men are also the ones
00:12:32.478 --> 00:12:33.512
who have gone out into the unforgiving
00:12:33.512 --> 00:12:35.027
wilderness to kill dangerous animals so
00:12:35.027 --> 00:12:36.694
ungrateful entitled women like you could
00:12:36.694 --> 00:12:38.928
eat. You as a woman are substantially less
00:12:38.928 --> 00:12:40.827
likely to die during your daily activities
00:12:40.827 --> 00:12:42.377
and you don't have to worry about being
00:12:42.377 --> 00:12:44.145
called a deadbeat for not risking life in
00:12:44.145 --> 00:12:45.711
a factory or field for the benefit of
00:12:45.711 --> 00:12:47.162
others. Nor do you have to worry about
00:12:47.162 --> 00:12:48.511
being told you don't have a real job
00:12:48.511 --> 00:12:50.261
because you work with computers or push
00:12:50.261 --> 00:12:51.861
pencils in a safe, clean environment.
00:12:51.861 --> 00:12:53.861
Women work soft cushy jobs compared to
00:12:53.861 --> 00:12:55.911
men and that's why women make only 7% of
00:12:55.911 --> 00:12:58.495
workplace fatalities despite making up 47%
00:12:58.495 --> 00:13:00.395
of the work force. That is why you're
00:13:00.395 --> 00:13:02.228
perceived as the weaker sex. If you
00:13:02.228 --> 00:13:03.411
don't want people to see you that way,
00:13:03.411 --> 00:13:04.745
then get out of your comfortable air
00:13:04.745 --> 00:13:06.211
conditioned studio and go work on a
00:13:06.211 --> 00:13:08.144
craving boat on a coal mine. You're
00:13:08.144 --> 00:13:09.527
always complaining about employment
00:13:09.527 --> 00:13:11.028
discrimination, so go ahead, take the
00:13:11.028 --> 00:13:12.859
dirty dangerous jobs and show us all just
00:13:12.859 --> 00:13:14.628
how strong and tough you are. And look
00:13:14.628 --> 00:13:16.544
I don't begrudge women for working jobs
00:13:16.544 --> 00:13:18.045
that don't put them in danger and I will
00:13:18.045 --> 00:13:19.594
freely admit that my job isn't
00:13:19.594 --> 00:13:21.195
particularly dangerous; but if you're
00:13:21.195 --> 00:13:22.678
going to sit there and act like women
00:13:22.678 --> 00:13:24.561
are stronger than men just because you can
00:13:24.561 --> 00:13:26.160
give birth, something which you have a
00:13:26.160 --> 00:13:28.328
0.0002 percent chance of dying from if you
00:13:28.328 --> 00:13:30.162
live in the United States, and that's up
00:13:30.162 --> 00:13:31.896
from 15 years ago, then you can fuck right
00:13:31.896 --> 00:13:34.295
off. By the way passing a kidney stone
00:13:34.295 --> 00:13:36.145
hurts more than giving birth. Any woman
00:13:36.145 --> 00:13:37.978
who has experienced both will tell you
00:13:37.978 --> 00:13:39.294
that, and men get them more often so
00:13:39.294 --> 00:13:40.261
blow me.
00:13:40.261 --> 00:13:42.079
"Why is it so bad to show your emotions?"
00:13:42.079 --> 00:13:43.477
"It means you're human."
00:13:43.477 --> 00:13:45.029
Maybe it's because feminists like you
00:13:45.029 --> 00:13:46.812
tell us we're misogynists for even
00:13:46.812 --> 00:13:48.128
daring to complain about our problems.
00:13:48.128 --> 00:13:51.310
Since you're not a man and you don't have
00:13:51.310 --> 00:13:52.261
even the slightest inclining of what it's
00:13:52.261 --> 00:13:53.827
like to be a man, let me spell it out for
00:13:53.827 --> 00:13:55.643
you. Boys are socially conditioned from
00:13:55.643 --> 00:13:57.112
the day we learn to talk to not express
00:13:57.112 --> 00:13:59.828
our feelings. We are [unknown] constantly
00:13:59.828 --> 00:14:01.512
be told to man up and that boys don't cry.
00:14:01.512 --> 00:14:03.910
We don't have the privilege of showing
00:14:03.910 --> 00:14:06.111
our emotions because if we do, it's a sign
00:14:06.111 --> 00:14:08.294
of weakness. To put it simply, us men are
00:14:08.294 --> 00:14:09.843
programmed to believe that our own
00:14:09.843 --> 00:14:11.745
feelings are invalid, and so we hide them
00:14:11.745 --> 00:14:13.562
and we lie about them. We are raised to
00:14:13.562 --> 00:14:15.427
expect that if we tell you our feelings,
00:14:15.427 --> 00:14:17.045
you will shoot them down. You will tell
00:14:17.045 --> 00:14:18.879
us we're wrong for feeling the way we do,
00:14:18.879 --> 00:14:21.312
and even if you don't, we still don't want
00:14:21.312 --> 00:14:22.811
to tell you our feelings because
00:14:22.811 --> 00:14:23.762
we know you'll use them against us.
00:14:23.762 --> 00:14:25.378
You're probably thinking that you don't do
00:14:25.378 --> 00:14:27.061
that but you do, you do it all the time
00:14:27.061 --> 00:14:29.145
and don't even realize it. Ask yourself if
00:14:29.145 --> 00:14:30.495
you have ever had an argument
00:14:30.495 --> 00:14:31.628
with one of them men in your life and
00:14:31.628 --> 00:14:33.112
you told them "If you were a real man..."
00:14:33.112 --> 00:14:35.412
If you ever have then you have done
00:14:35.412 --> 00:14:37.479
exactly what I'm talking about. See no
00:14:37.479 --> 00:14:39.178
woman has ever been told "If you're
00:14:39.178 --> 00:14:40.945
a real woman you wouldn't feel this way"
00:14:40.945 --> 00:14:42.861
Women have their feelings cultivated and
00:14:42.861 --> 00:14:44.895
coddled. You're not only allowed to cry.
00:14:44.895 --> 00:14:46.743
you are expected to, and when you do,
00:14:46.743 --> 00:14:48.345
people around you give you sympathy and
00:14:48.345 --> 00:14:49.978
you are comforted. You are so used to
00:14:49.978 --> 00:14:51.444
getting sympathy that you feel entitled
00:14:51.444 --> 00:14:53.811
to it. Men don't have that luxury. A man
00:14:53.811 --> 00:14:55.928
fully expects to be looked down upon,
00:14:55.928 --> 00:14:57.427
and told that his feelings don't matter if
00:14:57.427 --> 00:14:59.011
he shows any sign of emotional weakness.
00:14:59.011 --> 00:15:01.244
Even by the people he trusts most, because
00:15:01.244 --> 00:15:03.178
that is what he has experienced for
00:15:03.178 --> 00:15:05.328
his entire life, and you wonder why the
00:15:05.328 --> 00:15:06.977
suicide rate for men is four times higher
00:15:06.977 --> 00:15:08.778
than it is for women. I know what you're
00:15:08.778 --> 00:15:10.061
going to say, you're going to say that
00:15:10.061 --> 00:15:11.461
the social conditioning of men to not
00:15:11.461 --> 00:15:12.861
show their emotions is part of the
00:15:12.861 --> 00:15:15.095
patriarchy, and feminism is fighting to
00:15:15.095 --> 00:15:17.245
change that. Good, what heroes you are,
00:15:17.245 --> 00:15:19.179
let me give you a little golf clap while
00:15:19.179 --> 00:15:20.328
you take a sip from your fucking
00:15:20.328 --> 00:15:21.528
'Male Tears' mug while sitting in the
00:15:21.528 --> 00:15:23.127
comfort of your safe space, where
00:15:23.127 --> 00:15:24.562
men aren't allowed.
00:15:24.562 --> 00:15:28.178
"Why are you always trying to prove your
00:15:28.178 --> 00:15:29.112
masculinity?"
00:15:29.112 --> 00:15:31.028
See my answer to the previous question.
00:15:31.028 --> 00:15:34.078
Also wow, how egocentric are you.
00:15:34.078 --> 00:15:36.061
You are so certain that the world
00:15:36.061 --> 00:15:37.711
revolves around you that you believe that
00:15:37.711 --> 00:15:39.429
when a man is acting like a man, that he
00:15:39.429 --> 00:15:41.045
must be trying to prove something to you.
00:15:41.045 --> 00:15:42.912
Like he couldn't possibly be acting like a
00:15:42.912 --> 00:15:44.345
man just because he's, you know, a
00:15:44.345 --> 00:15:46.694
fucking man. Why are you constantly trying
00:15:46.694 --> 00:15:48.760
to prove your femininity to me? How
00:15:48.760 --> 00:15:49.360
bout that?
00:15:49.360 --> 00:15:51.110
"Why the fuck isn't it lady like to cuss?
00:15:51.110 --> 00:15:53.029
When did words get gendered?"
00:15:53.029 --> 00:15:54.710
It's also not considered gentlemen like
00:15:54.710 --> 00:15:56.528
to curse. Swearing is generally
00:15:56.528 --> 00:15:57.978
considered rude regardless of the gender
00:15:57.978 --> 00:15:59.796
of the person who is doing it. Personally
00:15:59.796 --> 00:16:01.062
I don't give a shit if you use
00:16:01.062 --> 00:16:02.345
profanity. Go right the fuck ahead.
00:16:02.345 --> 00:16:04.361
And when did words get genered?
00:16:04.361 --> 00:16:05.611
I guess right around the time the
00:16:05.611 --> 00:16:07.328
word feminist was invented, which is
00:16:07.328 --> 00:16:09.079
at self a gendered word. I'm mean the
00:16:09.079 --> 00:16:10.811
invention of feminism is when everything
00:16:10.811 --> 00:16:12.594
suddenly became gendered. Like when assert
00:16:12.594 --> 00:16:14.110
that interrupting people is somehow a
00:16:14.110 --> 00:16:16.177
uniquely male behavior, or that only
00:16:16.177 --> 00:16:17.760
women get told not to swear.
00:16:17.760 --> 00:16:19.845
"Why is it your first instinct to doubt
00:16:19.845 --> 00:16:21.660
women who have been sexually violated or
00:16:21.660 --> 00:16:22.611
raped?"
00:16:22.611 --> 00:16:24.527
Maybe a false rape accusation weren't
00:16:24.527 --> 00:16:26.428
systemically encouraged by feminism,
00:16:26.428 --> 00:16:28.311
we wouldn't have a problem. Notice how
00:16:28.311 --> 00:16:30.228
this question is phrased, to doubt women
00:16:30.228 --> 00:16:32.528
who have been sexually violated or raped.
00:16:32.528 --> 00:16:34.544
The more salient question would be,
00:16:34.544 --> 00:16:36.129
'Why do you doubt women who claim to have
00:16:36.129 --> 00:16:37.945
been sexually violated or raped. And the
00:16:37.945 --> 00:16:39.795
answer is because we have this thing
00:16:39.795 --> 00:16:41.845
called the presumption of innocence.
00:16:41.845 --> 00:16:43.729
That means a person who is accused of a
00:16:43.729 --> 00:16:45.595
crime is innocent until proven guilty.
00:16:45.595 --> 00:16:47.761
So it's not my first instinct to doubt,
00:16:47.761 --> 00:16:50.344
it's my moral imperative to doubt until
00:16:50.344 --> 00:16:53.078
evidence is forthcoming. You wouldn't put
00:16:53.078 --> 00:16:54.478
somebody in jail just because somebody
00:16:54.478 --> 00:16:56.230
accused them of murder nor would you put
00:16:56.230 --> 00:16:57.829
them in jail just because somebody accused
00:16:57.829 --> 00:16:59.361
them of theft, nor would you put them in
00:16:59.361 --> 00:17:00.695
jail because somebody accused them of any
00:17:00.695 --> 00:17:02.145
other crime. Why should accusations of
00:17:02.145 --> 00:17:04.828
rape be held to a different standard? This
00:17:04.828 --> 00:17:06.245
really isn't a difficult concept to
00:17:06.245 --> 00:17:07.845
understand, and it both baffles me and
00:17:07.845 --> 00:17:09.529
disturbs me how often I see feminists
00:17:09.529 --> 00:17:11.845
failing to grasp this. For people who
00:17:11.845 --> 00:17:13.194
claim to fight for social justice, you
00:17:13.194 --> 00:17:14.628
really don't understand how justice works,
00:17:14.628 --> 00:17:17.245
do you? See a man who its accused of rape,
00:17:17.245 --> 00:17:19.644
will have his life ruined. That's not even
00:17:19.644 --> 00:17:21.579
only if he is convicted, the mere
00:17:21.579 --> 00:17:23.561
accusation is enough to cost him his job,
00:17:23.561 --> 00:17:25.328
his relationships, his education and
00:17:25.328 --> 00:17:26.795
career prospects, his home, his
00:17:26.795 --> 00:17:29.463
reputation, and so on. If a woman wants
00:17:29.463 --> 00:17:31.211
to ruin a man's life all she has to do is
00:17:31.211 --> 00:17:32.979
accuse him of raping her and he will be
00:17:32.979 --> 00:17:34.177
put through the ringer by law enforcement
00:17:34.177 --> 00:17:35.896
and the media; and even if he is found not
00:17:35.896 --> 00:17:37.428
guilty, the damage will have already been
00:17:37.428 --> 00:17:39.062
done and the woman who made the false
00:17:39.062 --> 00:17:40.678
accusation will get away scot free.
00:17:40.678 --> 00:17:42.912
Really it astonishes me that even after
00:17:42.912 --> 00:17:44.646
what happened at Duke and the University
00:17:44.646 --> 00:17:46.177
of Virginia, that you're still asking
00:17:46.177 --> 00:17:47.646
this question. Furthermore, feminists
00:17:47.646 --> 00:17:49.045
have abused the word rape to point where
00:17:49.045 --> 00:17:51.245
its lost all meaning. Everything is rape.
00:17:51.245 --> 00:17:53.462
Its gotten to the point where if a woman
00:17:53.462 --> 00:17:54.911
claims she was raped I have to wonder
00:17:54.911 --> 00:17:56.144
if she means a guy actually forcibly put
00:17:56.144 --> 00:17:57.945
his penis in her, or if she had
00:17:57.945 --> 00:17:59.429
consensual sex and just decided to call it
00:17:59.429 --> 00:18:01.162
rape when she decided she regretted it the
00:18:01.162 --> 00:18:02.595
next morning, or if she's merely
00:18:02.595 --> 00:18:04.578
complaining that a guy looked at her in
00:18:04.578 --> 00:18:06.012
a way that made her feel uncomfortable.
00:18:06.012 --> 00:18:07.312
I mean what even is rape at this point?
00:18:07.312 --> 00:18:09.995
According to some feminists, it's rape if
00:18:09.995 --> 00:18:11.496
a man changed positions during sex without
00:18:11.496 --> 00:18:13.912
forewarning. It's rape if your boyfriend
00:18:13.912 --> 00:18:15.911
breaks up with you because you cheated on
00:18:15.911 --> 00:18:17.928
him. It's rape if you overhear somebody
00:18:17.928 --> 00:18:19.362
calling somebody else a slut.
00:18:19.362 --> 00:18:23.844
"I got raped, when my mother called
00:18:23.844 --> 00:18:25.979
someone else's daughter a slut."
00:18:25.979 --> 00:18:28.129
Really it's your own damn fault that
00:18:28.129 --> 00:18:29.795
people are becoming increasingly reluctant
00:18:29.795 --> 00:18:31.713
to believe rape accusations, because you
00:18:31.713 --> 00:18:33.062
have expanded the definition so broadly,
00:18:33.062 --> 00:18:34.612
that nobody even knows when you're really
00:18:34.612 --> 00:18:36.680
talking about rape anymore. You did this,
00:18:36.680 --> 00:18:38.878
you asked for it, and now you have buyers
00:18:38.878 --> 00:18:40.895
remorse. Now let me pose a question to
00:18:40.895 --> 00:18:42.578
you, why is it your first instinct to
00:18:42.578 --> 00:18:44.512
doubt when a man says he was sexually
00:18:44.512 --> 00:18:45.913
violated or raped by a woman.
00:18:45.913 --> 00:18:47.411
"Why do you assume a woman is angry
00:18:47.411 --> 00:18:48.761
because she's on her period?"
00:18:48.761 --> 00:18:50.413
Because women get angry when they're on
00:18:50.413 --> 00:18:52.295
their period. It's a scientific fact that
00:18:52.295 --> 00:18:54.079
the hormonal changes a woman experiences
00:18:54.079 --> 00:18:55.596
during her period cause her to become
00:18:55.596 --> 00:18:57.563
irritable. This is called premenstrual
00:18:57.563 --> 00:18:59.980
syndrome, or PMS. However, I don't
00:18:59.980 --> 00:19:02.012
always assume a woman is angry because
00:19:02.012 --> 00:19:03.596
she is on her period. If your boyfriend
00:19:03.596 --> 00:19:04.562
thinks that, then maybe it's because
00:19:04.562 --> 00:19:05.962
you're not being straight forward with him
00:19:05.962 --> 00:19:07.195
and expecting him to be a mind reader.
00:19:07.195 --> 00:19:09.063
Maybe you should try telling him why
00:19:09.063 --> 00:19:10.928
you're angry. Ever thought about that?
00:19:10.928 --> 00:19:12.729
Ever thought about simply telling him that
00:19:12.729 --> 00:19:13.929
you're mad that he ate the last
00:19:13.929 --> 00:19:15.594
Klondike bar or whatever trivial bullshit
00:19:15.594 --> 00:19:17.345
you're getting your panties in twist over.
00:19:17.345 --> 00:19:18.862
[mocking voice] "Awe he should just be
00:19:18.862 --> 00:19:19.696
able to figure it out"
00:19:19.696 --> 00:19:20.863
Yeah like you should be able to figure out
00:19:20.863 --> 00:19:22.096
the answers to these stupid questions
00:19:22.096 --> 00:19:23.412
you're asking.
00:19:23.412 --> 00:19:24.695
"Why do you think women that wear makeup
00:19:24.695 --> 00:19:27.079
are false advertising, we can say the same
00:19:27.079 --> 00:19:28.413
thing about your dick size."
00:19:28.413 --> 00:19:30.078
You actually answered the question
00:19:30.078 --> 00:19:30.677
yourself. We consider it false
00:19:30.677 --> 00:19:32.095
advertising for the same reason that you
00:19:32.095 --> 00:19:33.678
think a man who stuffs the crotch of his
00:19:33.678 --> 00:19:35.946
pants is false advertising. If you cover
00:19:35.946 --> 00:19:37.262
up all your pimples and scars with makeup
00:19:37.262 --> 00:19:38.813
you can't really be surprised when he's
00:19:38.813 --> 00:19:40.562
taken aback upon discover that you
00:19:40.562 --> 00:19:41.978
don't really look the way you did when you
00:19:41.978 --> 00:19:44.096
first met. I mean wouldn't you feel like
00:19:44.096 --> 00:19:45.579
you were lied to if you met a guy who
00:19:45.579 --> 00:19:47.029
looked well dressed and drove a nice car,
00:19:47.029 --> 00:19:48.612
but then you found out that he got his
00:19:48.612 --> 00:19:50.413
clothes at goodwill, and he rented that
00:19:50.413 --> 00:19:51.962
car with his burger king salary.
00:19:51.962 --> 00:19:53.862
"Why isn't it weird that there's a bunch
00:19:53.862 --> 00:19:55.512
of old white men sitting in a room,
00:19:55.512 --> 00:19:58.162
making legislation about what I can and
00:19:58.162 --> 00:19:59.628
can't do with my body?"
00:19:59.628 --> 00:20:01.295
Wasn't it a room full of old white men
00:20:01.295 --> 00:20:02.879
that decided the Roe v. Wade ruling.
00:20:02.879 --> 00:20:05.196
You know, women have had the right to
00:20:05.196 --> 00:20:07.112
vote for almost a hundred years now, and
00:20:07.112 --> 00:20:08.545
polling data has found that women are more
00:20:08.545 --> 00:20:10.412
likely to vote than men; and yet these
00:20:10.412 --> 00:20:12.512
old white men keep getting elected.
00:20:12.512 --> 00:20:14.362
And I see a lot of you people supporting
00:20:14.362 --> 00:20:16.079
Bernie Sanders even though he looks pretty
00:20:16.079 --> 00:20:18.312
fuckin old and white to me. Go figure.
00:20:18.312 --> 00:20:19.996
Furthermore, why does it even matter that
00:20:19.996 --> 00:20:21.462
they're white? Why does their melanin
00:20:21.462 --> 00:20:22.995
level matter more than the merit of their
00:20:22.995 --> 00:20:25.579
ideas? Wasn't it Martin Luther King Jr.
00:20:25.579 --> 00:20:27.529
who once said "I have a dream that my
00:20:27.529 --> 00:20:29.330
four little children will one day live in
00:20:29.330 --> 00:20:30.845
a nation where they will not be judge by
00:20:30.845 --> 00:20:32.111
the color of their skin, but by the
00:20:32.111 --> 00:20:33.861
content of their character." For as much
00:20:33.861 --> 00:20:35.629
as you people like to accuse other of
00:20:35.629 --> 00:20:37.079
being racist, you sure do judge people
00:20:37.079 --> 00:20:39.045
based on their race a lot. Oh but it's
00:20:39.045 --> 00:20:40.880
not racism when you do it because of
00:20:40.880 --> 00:20:42.112
power structures or some other mental
00:20:42.112 --> 00:20:43.778
gymnastic bullshit, right? As if whether
00:20:43.778 --> 00:20:45.496
or not the prejudice somebody is being
00:20:45.496 --> 00:20:47.096
subjected to is institutionalized makes
00:20:47.096 --> 00:20:49.096
any difference to them when it happens.
00:20:49.096 --> 00:20:50.945
Fuck off. Racism is racism, regardless of
00:20:50.945 --> 00:20:52.979
who is doing it to whom. Calling it
00:20:52.979 --> 00:20:54.462
something other than racism doesn't
00:20:54.462 --> 00:20:56.163
change the fact that it's fucking racism;
00:20:56.163 --> 00:20:57.646
And the only people who think otherwise
00:20:57.646 --> 00:20:59.278
are racist like you. This mentality that
00:20:59.278 --> 00:21:01.295
only certain people can be racist hinges
00:21:01.295 --> 00:21:02.996
on the categorization of people based on
00:21:02.996 --> 00:21:04.978
their ethnicity, and the ascribing of
00:21:04.978 --> 00:21:06.495
attributes to them such as privilege,
00:21:06.495 --> 00:21:08.795
based on those racial categories. You
00:21:08.795 --> 00:21:10.429
have to make judgements based on race to
00:21:10.429 --> 00:21:11.896
make this argument work, you have to make
00:21:11.896 --> 00:21:13.778
assumptions and generalization about their
00:21:13.778 --> 00:21:15.296
race and origin to make those judgments.
00:21:15.296 --> 00:21:16.963
So you have to be racist to use this
00:21:16.963 --> 00:21:18.979
argument, how do you not see the problem
00:21:18.979 --> 00:21:20.329
with this, how do you not see the problem
00:21:20.329 --> 00:21:21.529
with putting people's race before the
00:21:21.529 --> 00:21:23.162
merits of their argument and categorizing
00:21:23.162 --> 00:21:25.095
people into a hierarchy of consideration
00:21:25.095 --> 00:21:26.812
based on their race. How the fuck do you
00:21:26.812 --> 00:21:28.662
expect to fight racism with racism, and
00:21:28.662 --> 00:21:30.146
then expect people to take you seriously.
00:21:30.146 --> 00:21:31.978
Maybe this is the reason why you think
00:21:31.978 --> 00:21:33.296
that if somebody thinks that you're
00:21:33.296 --> 00:21:34.546
stupid it must be because you're a woman.
00:21:34.546 --> 00:21:36.329
You're projecting, you judge other people
00:21:36.329 --> 00:21:37.813
based on their race and gender so you
00:21:37.813 --> 00:21:39.378
assume other people are doing it to you.
00:21:39.378 --> 00:21:41.146
Well I've got news for you, I don't think
00:21:41.146 --> 00:21:42.879
you're stupid because you're a woman, I
00:21:42.879 --> 00:21:44.745
think you're stupid because you're stupid.
00:21:44.745 --> 00:21:47.229
Anyway I'm getting off topic, it's not
00:21:47.229 --> 00:21:48.811
like they don't also tell me what I can't
00:21:48.811 --> 00:21:50.981
do with my body. For example, I can't take
00:21:50.981 --> 00:21:52.829
the palm of my hand and slap some sense
00:21:52.829 --> 00:21:54.462
into you, without being considered
00:21:54.462 --> 00:21:55.245
assault.
00:21:55.245 --> 00:21:56.212
"Do you have a coochie?"
00:21:56.212 --> 00:21:56.946
No.
00:21:56.946 --> 00:21:57.613
"Why are straight guys so obsessed with
00:21:57.613 --> 00:21:58.278
lesbians?"
00:21:58.278 --> 00:21:59.346
Why are straight women so obsessed with
00:21:59.346 --> 00:22:01.345
gay guys? Or better yet, why are women
00:22:01.345 --> 00:22:03.362
so obsessed with lesbians? According to
00:22:03.362 --> 00:22:05.878
Porn hub search data for 2014, the number
00:22:05.878 --> 00:22:07.345
one thing women search for was lesbian
00:22:07.345 --> 00:22:09.312
porn. Proportionately women look up
00:22:09.312 --> 00:22:10.763
lesbian porn more than men do.
00:22:10.763 --> 00:22:12.779
"How does it feel to get kicked in the
00:22:12.779 --> 00:22:13.430
balls?"
00:22:13.430 --> 00:22:14.512
How do you think it feels, you dumb
00:22:14.512 --> 00:22:15.329
bitch?
00:22:15.329 --> 00:22:16.879
"Do you ever get tired of being manly all
00:22:16.879 --> 00:22:17.630
the time?"
00:22:17.630 --> 00:22:19.246
Do you? You're the one that's dressed like
00:22:19.246 --> 00:22:21.579
a lumberjack. To answer the question, no,
00:22:21.579 --> 00:22:23.797
not really. It comes naturally to me
00:22:23.797 --> 00:22:26.562
since I'm, you know, a man. The fact
00:22:26.562 --> 00:22:28.062
that you're asking this question implies
00:22:28.062 --> 00:22:29.312
that you sometimes get tired of being
00:22:29.312 --> 00:22:30.862
feminine, so do you ever get tired of
00:22:30.862 --> 00:22:32.562
being feminine all the time? Is that why
00:22:32.562 --> 00:22:33.846
you're dressed like a lumberjack?
00:22:33.846 --> 00:22:35.362
Would you like to be a man?
00:22:35.362 --> 00:22:37.361
Well you have to pass a test first. Have
00:22:37.361 --> 00:22:39.063
you mastered the art of manspreading?
00:22:39.063 --> 00:22:40.829
Have you completed your forty hours of
00:22:40.829 --> 00:22:42.362
rape training?
00:22:42.362 --> 00:22:43.845
"Why are you so afraid of gender
00:22:43.845 --> 00:22:44.412
equality?"
00:22:44.412 --> 00:22:46.713
I'm not. You are. What I'm afraid of is
00:22:46.713 --> 00:22:48.829
gender inequality. Which is what feminist
00:22:48.829 --> 00:22:50.563
are actually pushing for. You want
00:22:50.563 --> 00:22:53.462
examples? In 2005, Swedish Politian and
00:22:53.462 --> 00:22:55.263 line:1
co-founder of feminist initiative,
00:22:55.263 --> 00:22:57.246 line:1
Godrum Schyman, proposed what the media
00:22:57.246 --> 00:22:59.129 line:1
called a man tax, which would have raised
00:22:59.129 --> 00:23:00.762 line:1
taxes for men in Sweden. Basing it on the
00:23:00.762 --> 00:23:02.280 line:1
idea that all men should be held
00:23:02.280 --> 00:23:04.280 line:1
accountable for all man on women violence.
00:23:04.280 --> 00:23:06.113 line:1
It should be noted that Schyman was
00:23:06.113 --> 00:23:08.563 line:1
convicted of tax evasion in 2004, a
00:23:08.563 --> 00:23:10.180 line:1
year before making this proposal.
00:23:10.180 --> 00:23:12.697 line:1
In 2010, women's group leaders in Isreal
00:23:12.697 --> 00:23:14.279 line:1
have unanimously opposed changes to rape
00:23:14.279 --> 00:23:16.496 line:1
laws that would make it possible for
00:23:16.496 --> 00:23:18.362 line:1
women to be convicted of rape. They
00:23:18.362 --> 00:23:20.796 line:1
succeeded and now women in Israel commit
00:23:20.796 --> 00:23:22.879 line:1
sex act on non-consenting adults or
00:23:22.879 --> 00:23:24.346 line:1
children who are not old enough to
00:23:24.346 --> 00:23:25.712 line:1
legally give informed consent, are not
00:23:25.712 --> 00:23:27.179 line:1
actually being charged with rape, and are
00:23:27.179 --> 00:23:29.130 line:1
instead charged with lesser crimes. In
00:23:29.130 --> 00:23:31.179 line:1
2013 Indian feminists successfully
00:23:31.179 --> 00:23:33.012 line:1
pressured the government to rewrite rape
00:23:33.012 --> 00:23:34.680 line:1
laws in such a way that only men could be
00:23:34.680 --> 00:23:37.046 line:1
charged with rape. In 2014, Jessica
00:23:37.046 --> 00:23:38.730 line:1
Valenti published an article in the
00:23:38.730 --> 00:23:40.462 line:1
Guardian advocating paying men less than
00:23:40.462 --> 00:23:43.013 line:1
women. In 2015, York University planned to
00:23:43.013 --> 00:23:45.012 line:1
hold an international men's day meant to
00:23:45.012 --> 00:23:46.829 line:1
highlight issues affecting men and boys,
00:23:46.829 --> 00:23:48.696 line:1
such as the high suicide rate, shorter
00:23:48.696 --> 00:23:50.412 line:1
life expectancies, and struggles faced in
00:23:50.412 --> 00:23:52.696 line:1
getting and education. It was canceled
00:23:52.696 --> 00:23:54.513 line:1
after feminists student, staff, and alumni
00:23:54.513 --> 00:23:56.462 line:1
protested and held a petition to ban it,
00:23:56.462 --> 00:23:58.478 line:1
which received almost 200 signatures.
00:23:58.478 --> 00:23:59.896 line:1
To add insult to injury, Holly Baxter
00:23:59.896 --> 00:24:01.562 line:1
wrote a condescending article on
00:24:01.562 --> 00:24:04.162 line:1
Independent.co.uk enlightening readers
00:24:04.162 --> 00:24:05.778 line:1
why we don't need an international men's
00:24:05.778 --> 00:24:07.880 line:1
day. You can claim the definition of
00:24:07.880 --> 00:24:09.747 line:1
feminism is advocating gender equality
00:24:09.747 --> 00:24:11.512 line:1
all you want, but actions speak louder than
00:24:11.512 --> 00:24:13.747 line:1
words. And it's really hard to believe the
00:24:13.747 --> 00:24:15.579 line:1
feminist movement is really a movement
00:24:15.579 --> 00:24:17.129 line:1
for equality, when you dismiss anyone who
00:24:17.129 --> 00:24:18.696 line:1
brings up men's issues as misogynists.
00:24:18.696 --> 00:24:20.862 line:1
You say all men are rapists, you try to
00:24:20.862 --> 00:24:23.045 line:1
ban men from certain place son college
00:24:23.045 --> 00:24:24.647 line:1
campuses, you actively fight against
00:24:24.647 --> 00:24:26.046 line:1
father's rights, undermine the
00:24:26.046 --> 00:24:27.563 line:1
presumption of innocence when it comes
00:24:27.563 --> 00:24:28.480 line:1
to rape accusations, and you deny
00:24:28.480 --> 00:24:30.379 line:1
statistics about male victims of domestic
00:24:30.379 --> 00:24:32.130 line:1
abuse. As well as protest and disrupt
00:24:32.130 --> 00:24:33.928 line:1
conferences about male suicide.
00:24:33.928 --> 00:24:36.447 line:1
"This is what mens' rights looks like"
00:24:36.447 --> 00:24:38.696 line:1
"This is what mens' rights looks like"
00:24:38.696 --> 00:24:41.763 line:1
"This is what mens' rights looks like"
00:24:41.763 --> 00:24:43.712 line:1
All that said, why are you so afraid of
00:24:43.712 --> 00:24:44.829 line:1
gender equality?
00:24:44.829 --> 00:24:45.579 line:1
"Why do I deserve to be paid less than
00:24:45.579 --> 00:24:47.430 line:1
you?"
00:24:47.430 --> 00:24:49.330 line:1
"In what world does 77 cents equal a
00:24:49.330 --> 00:24:50.013 line:1
dollar?"
00:24:50.013 --> 00:24:51.413 line:1
"In what world does 68 cents equal a
00:24:51.413 --> 00:24:51.997 line:1
dollar?"
00:24:51.997 --> 00:24:52.913 line:1
"How is that fair?"
00:24:52.913 --> 00:24:54.813 line:1
After I finished writing my answers to
00:24:54.813 --> 00:24:55.845 line:1
all these questions, I actually counted
00:24:55.845 --> 00:24:56.896 line:1
them and realized there are only 33
00:24:56.896 --> 00:24:58.695 line:1
questions, instead of 36. I just
00:24:58.695 --> 00:25:00.262 line:1
naturally assumed these four questions
00:25:00.262 --> 00:25:02.029 line:1
are actually one and answer them as such,
00:25:02.029 --> 00:25:03.579 line:1
but no. Buzzfeed actually considered this
00:25:03.579 --> 00:25:05.112 line:1
compound question as a bunch of seperate
00:25:05.112 --> 00:25:07.179 line:1
questions, in order to bolster their count
00:25:07.179 --> 00:25:09.013 line:1
for their deceptive, click baiting title.
00:25:09.013 --> 00:25:10.230 line:1
Like it wasn't bad enough that they're
00:25:10.230 --> 00:25:12.897 line:1
already not even questions. Anyway, this
00:25:12.897 --> 00:25:15.029 line:1
has been pointed out countless times by
00:25:15.029 --> 00:25:16.946 line:1
countless other people, but the wage gap
00:25:16.946 --> 00:25:18.711 line:1
is bullshit, and when I say it's bullshit
00:25:18.711 --> 00:25:20.180 line:1
I don't mean that it doesn't exist.
00:25:20.180 --> 00:25:21.931 line:1
I mean it's bullshit because of the way
00:25:21.931 --> 00:25:24.063 line:1
it's presented. The observed wage gap it
00:25:24.063 --> 00:25:25.613 line:1
based on comparing the average income of
00:25:25.613 --> 00:25:26.896 line:1
men to the average income of women without
00:25:26.896 --> 00:25:29.230 line:1
considering any variables. Sometimes when
00:25:29.230 --> 00:25:30.912 line:1
the wage gap is brought up they add women
00:25:30.912 --> 00:25:32.179 line:1
get paid less for the same jobs, but
00:25:32.179 --> 00:25:34.496 line:1
that's horseshit. Asking women why they
00:25:34.496 --> 00:25:36.130 line:1
get paid less than men is like asking why
00:25:36.130 --> 00:25:37.413 line:1
men are more likely to die in the
00:25:37.413 --> 00:25:39.295 line:1
workplace than women. It's because men
00:25:39.295 --> 00:25:41.013 line:1
and women tend to work different jobs;
00:25:41.013 --> 00:25:43.630 line:1
and just like some jobs are more dangerous
00:25:43.630 --> 00:25:45.229 line:1
than others, some jobs pay more than
00:25:45.229 --> 00:25:46.963 line:1
others. And since men tend to work
00:25:46.963 --> 00:25:48.963 line:1
higher paying jobs, such as those in STEM
00:25:48.963 --> 00:25:50.929 line:1
fields, men tend to make more money.
00:25:50.929 --> 00:25:52.596 line:1
And even when you are comparing men and
00:25:52.596 --> 00:25:54.479 line:1
women working the same jobs, there are
00:25:54.479 --> 00:25:56.480 line:1
things which factor into why men get paid
00:25:56.480 --> 00:25:58.212 line:1
more. Such as the fact that men are more
00:25:58.212 --> 00:26:00.314 line:1
likely to work overtime, or more likely
00:26:00.314 --> 00:26:01.996 line:1
to ask for raises or promotions, or less
00:26:01.996 --> 00:26:04.163 line:1
likely to take time off, or more
00:26:04.163 --> 00:26:06.312 line:1
competitive, or more likely to take risks,
00:26:06.312 --> 00:26:08.112 line:1
prioritize earnings more than women,
00:26:08.112 --> 00:26:09.779 line:1
retire at a later age, and all these other
00:26:09.779 --> 00:26:12.630 line:1
things which studies have found. With all
00:26:12.630 --> 00:26:14.363 line:1
this taken into consideration, it's no
00:26:14.363 --> 00:26:16.614 line:1
wonder that men get paid more, men work
00:26:16.614 --> 00:26:19.147 line:1
more. And really I hate to point out this
00:26:19.147 --> 00:26:20.830 line:1
obvious bit of common sense, but if
00:26:20.830 --> 00:26:22.213 line:1
companies could actually get away with
00:26:22.213 --> 00:26:23.696 line:1
paying women less, don't you think they
00:26:23.696 --> 00:26:25.029 line:1
would just hire nothing but women to save
00:26:25.029 --> 00:26:26.446 line:1
money. Do you honestly think that
00:26:26.446 --> 00:26:28.197 line:1
corporations are such boys clubs that
00:26:28.197 --> 00:26:30.162 line:1
giving advantages to men is more important
00:26:30.162 --> 00:26:32.096 line:1
to them than their profits and shareholder
00:26:32.096 --> 00:26:34.863 line:1
interests. Don't be stupid. And no the
00:26:34.863 --> 00:26:36.529 line:1
fact that there are so few women in STEM
00:26:36.529 --> 00:26:37.829 line:1
fields has nothing to do with
00:26:37.829 --> 00:26:39.647 line:1
discrimination. In fact, surveys have
00:26:39.647 --> 00:26:41.196 line:1
found that there is a 2 to 1 preference
00:26:41.196 --> 00:26:42.746 line:1
for female applicants in STEM fields
00:26:42.746 --> 00:26:45.096 line:1
over equally qualified men. So the reason
00:26:45.096 --> 00:26:46.462 line:1
that there are so few women in STEM
00:26:46.462 --> 00:26:48.446 line:1
fields is because few women are interested
00:26:48.446 --> 00:26:50.913 line:1
in pursuing careers in STEM fields. If you
00:26:50.913 --> 00:26:52.497 line:1
want more women in STEM fields, then maybe
00:26:52.497 --> 00:26:53.996 line:1
you shouldn't have wasted your parents
00:26:53.996 --> 00:26:55.563 line:1
money on a degree in gender studies.
00:26:55.563 --> 00:26:57.547 line:1
And if you wish to continue pushing this
00:26:57.547 --> 00:26:59.180 line:1
baseless contention that the patriarchy
00:26:59.180 --> 00:27:00.879 line:1
is keeping women out of STEM fields, then
00:27:00.879 --> 00:27:02.662 line:1
explain why the patriarchy isn't stopping
00:27:02.662 --> 00:27:04.413 line:1
women from dominating certain fields
00:27:04.413 --> 00:27:06.113 line:1
such as veterinary, medicine, psychology,
00:27:06.113 --> 00:27:08.547 line:1
pharmacology, and biology. Furthermore,
00:27:08.547 --> 00:27:10.597 line:1
which is it, 77 cents to a dollar or 68
00:27:10.597 --> 00:27:13.113 line:1
cents. I've also heard other feminists
00:27:13.113 --> 00:27:15.113 line:1
claim 72 cents. The fact that you can't
00:27:15.113 --> 00:27:16.514 line:1
keep your story straight kind of says
00:27:16.514 --> 00:27:18.114 line:1
something about it. And I'm really
00:27:18.114 --> 00:27:19.496 line:1
struggling to understand why you thought
00:27:19.496 --> 00:27:21.046 line:1
including this discrepancy in your video
00:27:21.046 --> 00:27:22.697 line:1
was a good idea. Maybe you should have
00:27:22.697 --> 00:27:25.280 line:1
let a man proofread it. (whispering) that
00:27:25.280 --> 00:27:26.614 line:1
was a joke. I know I have to explain it
00:27:26.614 --> 00:27:28.296 line:1
because feminists don't understand jokes,
00:27:28.296 --> 00:27:30.379 line:1
but it was a joke, alright.
00:27:30.379 --> 00:27:32.163 line:1
"Why are you intimidated by a woman who
00:27:32.163 --> 00:27:33.696 line:1
makes more money than you? That's
00:27:33.696 --> 00:27:35.379 line:1
awesome! More money"
00:27:35.379 --> 00:27:37.047 line:1
I'm not, but since we're making
00:27:37.047 --> 00:27:39.330 line:1
assumptions, why are you intimidated
00:27:39.330 --> 00:27:41.697 line:1
by my deep, booming, commanding, yet
00:27:41.697 --> 00:27:43.213 line:1
sultry baritone voice.
00:27:43.213 --> 00:27:45.381 line:1
"Why are opiniated women seen as bitches?"
00:27:45.381 --> 00:27:47.897 line:1
"When opiniated men are seen as bosses."
00:27:47.897 --> 00:27:50.446 line:1
Opiniated men aren't seen as bosses unless
00:27:50.446 --> 00:27:51.879 line:1
they actually are somebody's boss.
00:27:51.879 --> 00:27:53.797 line:1
Otherwise they are just called assholes.
00:27:53.797 --> 00:27:55.796 line:1
Unless of course their opinions disagree
00:27:55.796 --> 00:27:57.480 line:1
with you. In which case they are kicked
00:27:57.480 --> 00:27:59.213 line:1
off of campus, banned from speaking at
00:27:59.213 --> 00:28:01.162 line:1
events, and told to stop mansplaining.
00:28:01.162 --> 00:28:03.213 line:1
Maybe that's why opiniated women like you
00:28:03.213 --> 00:28:04.464 line:1
are seen as bitches.
00:28:04.464 --> 00:28:06.430 line:1
"Why aren't you speaking up when you hear
00:28:06.430 --> 00:28:09.097 line:1
your male friends behind closed doors,
00:28:09.097 --> 00:28:10.895 line:1
make jokes that are offensive to
00:28:10.895 --> 00:28:11.613 line:1
women?"
00:28:11.613 --> 00:28:12.963 line:1
Because they're jokes, and they aren't
00:28:12.963 --> 00:28:14.546 line:1
meant to be taken seriously.
00:28:14.546 --> 00:28:16.497 line:1
"These people who are fucking offended by
00:28:16.497 --> 00:28:18.547 line:1
rape jokes don't even understand humor."
00:28:18.547 --> 00:28:20.380 line:1
If that's not a good enough answer, then
00:28:20.380 --> 00:28:22.429 line:1
let me ask you this, do you speak up when
00:28:22.429 --> 00:28:24.146 line:1
your female friends make jokes that are
00:28:24.146 --> 00:28:26.980 line:1
offensive to men, no? Why not? Oh because
00:28:26.980 --> 00:28:30.181 line:1
it's empowering right? Fuck off. Also I
00:28:30.181 --> 00:28:31.329 line:1
thought you said you were probably funnier
00:28:31.329 --> 00:28:33.280 line:1
than me? You think of yourself as a funny
00:28:33.280 --> 00:28:34.596 line:1
woman but you don't want people making
00:28:34.596 --> 00:28:35.763 line:1
jokes that don't cater to your own
00:28:35.763 --> 00:28:37.597 line:1
personal taste. Stop trying to please
00:28:37.597 --> 00:28:39.114 line:1
other people's speech, you empty
00:28:39.114 --> 00:28:40.380 line:1
headed bimbo. (Horn blaring)
00:28:40.380 --> 00:28:42.447 line:1
"Why are you so afraid of recognizing
00:28:42.447 --> 00:28:44.263 line:1
your own privilege? Doesn't mean you're a
00:28:44.263 --> 00:28:46.228 line:1
bad person, just recognizing it and do
00:28:46.228 --> 00:28:47.780 line:1
something about it."
00:28:47.780 --> 00:28:49.014 line:1
I just love how you boldly assert that I
00:28:49.014 --> 00:28:50.314 line:1
have privilege without backing up that
00:28:50.314 --> 00:28:52.079 line:1
assertion at all. And then pursue to talk
00:28:52.079 --> 00:28:53.596 line:1
down to me in this condescending tone,
00:28:53.596 --> 00:28:55.496 line:1
like it's just so obvious it's such an
00:28:55.496 --> 00:28:57.397 line:1
unassailable argument. (mocking voice)
00:28:57.397 --> 00:28:59.197 line:1
It doesn't mean you're a bad person.
00:28:59.197 --> 00:29:00.614 line:1
But I guess being the same gender as
00:29:00.614 --> 00:29:02.513 line:1
Donald Trump does. To answer your
00:29:02.513 --> 00:29:03.979 line:1
question, it's because I don't have
00:29:03.979 --> 00:29:06.196 line:1
privilege, I really don't, but you do.
00:29:06.196 --> 00:29:09.279 line:1
I defy you name one, just one, legal
00:29:09.279 --> 00:29:12.030 line:1
privilege that I have, which you don't
00:29:12.030 --> 00:29:13.663 line:1
also have. Because I can think of several
00:29:13.663 --> 00:29:15.530 line:1
you have which I don't have. Let me list
00:29:15.530 --> 00:29:18.430 line:1
ten. Women are almost always granted
00:29:18.430 --> 00:29:19.913 line:1
custody of children in a divorce by
00:29:19.913 --> 00:29:21.479 line:1
default unless the man can prove she is
00:29:21.479 --> 00:29:22.963 line:1
unfit to care for them. See
00:29:22.963 --> 00:29:24.379 line:1
misrepresentation of gender bias
00:29:24.379 --> 00:29:26.030 line:1
committee of Massachusetts Supreme Court
00:29:26.030 --> 00:29:28.763 line:1
by Mark B Rosenthal, this is despite
00:29:28.763 --> 00:29:30.430 line:1
the fact that children are twice as
00:29:30.430 --> 00:29:31.864 line:1
likely to be abused by their mother than
00:29:31.864 --> 00:29:33.330 line:1
they are by their father. According to
00:29:33.330 --> 00:29:34.964 line:1
page 49 of Child Maltreatment 2013
00:29:34.964 --> 00:29:37.297 line:1
published by the US Department of Health
00:29:37.297 --> 00:29:38.947 line:1
and Human Services. Women have more
00:29:38.947 --> 00:29:40.663 line:1
social safety nets designed for them,
00:29:40.663 --> 00:29:42.363 line:1
which is why they only make up 24% of
00:29:42.363 --> 00:29:44.263 line:1
the homeless population. This is in spite
00:29:44.263 --> 00:29:46.363 line:1
of the fact that 42% of homeless men are
00:29:46.363 --> 00:29:48.412 line:1
employed, versus only 27% of homeless
00:29:48.412 --> 00:29:50.164 line:1
women. This is according to page 2 of
00:29:50.164 --> 00:29:51.847 line:1
"Who's Homeless" published by the National
00:29:51.847 --> 00:29:54.263 line:1
Coalition for the Homeless, July 2009 and
00:29:54.263 --> 00:29:56.079 line:1
page 1 of "Single Males: The Homeless
00:29:56.079 --> 00:29:57.663 line:1
Majority" published by Healing Hands
00:29:57.663 --> 00:30:00.496 line:1
in June 2001. Women get more lenient
00:30:00.496 --> 00:30:02.230 line:1
sentences for equivalent crimes. See
00:30:02.230 --> 00:30:03.896 line:1
"Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal
00:30:03.896 --> 00:30:05.813 line:1
Criminal Cases" by Sonja B Starr in 2012.
00:30:05.813 --> 00:30:08.397 line:1
A woman could get a male coworker fired
00:30:08.397 --> 00:30:10.063 line:1
from his job simply by accusing him of
00:30:10.063 --> 00:30:11.962 line:1
sexual harassment even without proving it.
00:30:11.962 --> 00:30:13.813 line:1
It's so easy for a woman to get a man
00:30:13.813 --> 00:30:15.779 line:1
fired at a malice, and it happens so
00:30:15.779 --> 00:30:17.497 line:1
often that men are now starting to avoid
00:30:17.497 --> 00:30:19.214 line:1
women all together in the workplace.
00:30:19.214 --> 00:30:20.863 line:1
Refusing to mentor or help them.
00:30:20.863 --> 00:30:22.913 line:1
Kim Elsesser talks about this in her book,
00:30:22.913 --> 00:30:25.796 line:1
"Sex in the office" 2015. In California, a
00:30:25.796 --> 00:30:27.663 line:1
woman can declare a man to be the father
00:30:27.663 --> 00:30:29.280 line:1
of her child and sue him for child
00:30:29.280 --> 00:30:31.180 line:1
support and it's up to the man to prove
00:30:31.180 --> 00:30:33.264 line:1
he isn't the father by taking a DNA test.
00:30:33.264 --> 00:30:35.830 line:1
And he only gets 30 days to do so, if he
00:30:35.830 --> 00:30:37.514 line:1
doesn't do it in that time, then a court
00:30:37.514 --> 00:30:39.031 line:1
can declare him responsible for the child
00:30:39.031 --> 00:30:40.512 line:1
even if he proves he isn't the father
00:30:40.512 --> 00:30:43.463 line:1
later. A woman can sue a sperm donner for
00:30:43.463 --> 00:30:45.646 line:1
child support. A woman who gets
00:30:45.646 --> 00:30:47.564 line:1
pregnant with stolen sperm, can sue the
00:30:47.564 --> 00:30:49.379 line:1
man she stole it from for child support.
00:30:49.379 --> 00:30:51.231 line:1
And before you argue that a man should
00:30:51.231 --> 00:30:52.713 line:1
keep it in his pants so he doesn't want to
00:30:52.713 --> 00:30:54.397 line:1
be a father, imagine if you heard a
00:30:54.397 --> 00:30:55.946 line:1
conservative Christian arguing against
00:30:55.946 --> 00:30:57.297 line:1
abortion by saying 'women should keep
00:30:57.297 --> 00:30:58.580 line:1
their legs together if they don't want to
00:30:58.580 --> 00:31:00.364 line:1
be mothers' I think you would lose your
00:31:00.364 --> 00:31:02.897 line:1
shit. A woman who get pregnant by raping
00:31:02.897 --> 00:31:04.880 line:1
a man or an underage boy can sue him for
00:31:04.880 --> 00:31:06.880 line:1
child support. See Hermesmann V Seyer.
00:31:06.880 --> 00:31:08.930 line:1
A woman could get an abortion in
00:31:08.930 --> 00:31:10.563 line:1
complete disregard for the wishes of the
00:31:10.563 --> 00:31:12.180 line:1
father, she doesn't even have to tell
00:31:12.180 --> 00:31:14.263 line:1
she's seeking an abortion. A woman can
00:31:14.263 --> 00:31:15.914 line:1
also sue the father for child support if
00:31:15.914 --> 00:31:17.430 line:1
he wants nothing to do with the child.
00:31:17.430 --> 00:31:19.246 line:1
So basically a woman can opt out of
00:31:19.246 --> 00:31:20.630 line:1
parenthood but a man cannot.
00:31:20.630 --> 00:31:22.696 line:1
Domestic violence against women is
00:31:22.696 --> 00:31:25.030 line:1
actually taken seriously. Men are always
00:31:25.030 --> 00:31:26.680 line:1
presumed to be the aggressors in
00:31:26.680 --> 00:31:27.797 line:1
domestic violence cases. Despite the fact
00:31:27.797 --> 00:31:30.047 line:1
that CDC statistics have found that more
00:31:30.047 --> 00:31:32.280 line:1
than 70% of non reciprocated domestic
00:31:32.280 --> 00:31:33.980 line:1
violence is perpetuated by women.
00:31:33.980 --> 00:31:35.912 line:1
Even when a man is recognized as a being
00:31:35.912 --> 00:31:37.346 line:1
a victim of domestic abuse, he is almost
00:31:37.346 --> 00:31:38.464 line:1
always presumed to be at fault.
00:31:38.464 --> 00:31:39.913 line:1
People ask 'What did he do to piss her
00:31:39.913 --> 00:31:40.614 line:1
off?'
00:31:40.614 --> 00:31:43.263 line:1
So let me pose a question to you, Why are
00:31:43.263 --> 00:31:44.863 line:1
you so afraid of recognizing your
00:31:44.863 --> 00:31:46.946 line:1
privilege? It doesn't mean you're a bad
00:31:46.946 --> 00:31:49.063 line:1
person. Just recognize it and do something
00:31:49.063 --> 00:31:52.047 line:1
about it. Or don't, I already know you
00:31:52.047 --> 00:31:56.941 line:1
won't.