WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.128
(beep)
00:00:03.271 --> 00:00:12.470
(screaming)
00:00:12.470 --> 99:59:59.999
(jazzy intro)
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
How does it feel to be
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the same sex as Donald Trump?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
How does it feel to be
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the same sex as Sarah Palin?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
How does it feel to be
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the same sex as Michelle Bachman?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
How does it feel to be the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
same sex as anybody you disagree with?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Why does it even matter
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
whether or not you're the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
same gender as somebody else?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I mean, I'm also the same
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
gender as Abraham Lincoln, Einstein,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and the guy who introduced
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
chocolate to the Western world.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So what are you even getting
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
at with this question?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Are you trying to say Donald Trump
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is bad, and Donald Trump
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
is a man, therefore men are bad?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Why do you hate rom-coms?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Or do you just feel like you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
need to hate them?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Everybody likes The Notebook,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
everybody likes Beyoncé.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It's just a fact.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Men hate romantic comedies
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
for the same reason you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
hate video games with
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
over-sexualized female characters.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The men in these movies are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
always willing to sacrifice
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
their careers, their dreams,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
even their lives to win
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the lead females' affection.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Now I don't have any empirical
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
data to back this up, but
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it seems to me that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
romantic comedies and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
romance movies in general
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
cause women to have unrealistic
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
expectations of men and what
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
love should be like, and these
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
become the expectations
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that men have to live up to,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and it's unfair.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Feminists like to bitch
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
about poor representation of women
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in media intended for men
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because they promote body issues
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and shit like that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And I agree, to at least, an extent
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But it's not any better for men
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
When we're expected to be Prince Charming,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
ready and willing to sacrifice themselves
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
physically, mentally, and emotionally
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And we're called selfish for daring to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
have our own desires
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
or even misogynistic for daring to draw
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
attention to our own problems.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
These movies appeal to the female fantasy
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of having a night in shining armor
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
swear their entire existence to pleasing
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
them, and thus reinforce these notions
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
within their target audience of women
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
like you that you somehow deserve
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to have your boyfriends and husbands
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
give up everything that makes them
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who they are and basically dehumanize
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
themselves for your pleasure and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
devote 100% of their time and energy
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to you. The fact that some of you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
watching this are scoffing at what I
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
just said only proves my point.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You have fooled yourself into thinking
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that I'm somehow the one whose being
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
selfish when I object to the notion
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that men should be expected to cave
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
into all of your demands, for the sake of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
your perverted idealistic conception
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of love. And I have no doubts that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
some of you will accuse me of being
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
bitter at some ex girlfriend for saying
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that, but I'm not and I will
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
pre-emptively characterize such an
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
argument as out cropping of the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
very mentality that I'm talking about.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You expect all of your demands to be
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
catered to, and any man who is unwilling
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
or unable to cater to them must have
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
something wrong with them. Us men are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
human beings with our own interests and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
goals, and it's selfish for you to expect
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
us to give all that up for you.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But these movies condition you to expect
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
exactly that. And that is why we hate
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
romantic comedies. We don't see anything
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
romantic about them. What we see is the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
reinforcement of unfair and unreasonable
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
expectations about what we should be doing
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
with our own lives. Also, fuck Beyonce.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why do you make women sit around and talk
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
about men in movies when y'all easily just
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
sit around and talk about boobs for hours?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
One, I don't know, maybe you should be
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
asking that to people who rent romantic
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
comedies you like so much, because
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
those are the movies which have women
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
sitting around talking about men. Or,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
better yet, instead of complaining about
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
how writers depict women in their movies,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
maybe you should try being the change you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
want to see and write your own damn movie.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Then you could make the female characters
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
sit around and talk about whatever you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
want. Like how men are oppressing them, or
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
how men are objectifying them or how men
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
are such pigs, or how men spread their
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
legs too far apart on the subway, or how
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
men hate romantic comedies. There's
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
nothing stopping you.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Two, you're referring to the Bechdel Test,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
which is bullshit. All the Twilight movies
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
pass the Bechdel Test, but I think you'd
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
hesitate to call any of those movies
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"pro-feminist."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Three, I don't know a single guy who ever
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
talks about boobs for hours at a time.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I think the only guys who do are medical
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
students learning how to conduct
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
mammograms. You want to know what most of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the men I know talk about? Movies, video
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
games, politics, religion, music, sports,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
cars, boats, technology, work, guns,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
hunting, places they've been to, people
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
they've met, and so on. The subject of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
boobs actually rarely ever comes up.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Contrary to what you may have been told in
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
your Women's Studies class, men don't
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
think about sex constantly. If we did, we
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
would never have invented the camera
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
equipment you used to make this video.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Four. If anybody's talking about boobs for
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
hours at a time, it's feminists. You're
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the ones who are always whining about
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the designs of fictional characters,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
complaining that fat girls' tits are too
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
big. And in all honesty, the only time I
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
ever even think about a comic book
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
character's tits is when I hear a feminist
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
bring it up. So I think maybe you're
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
projecting.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why do you automatically assume that you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
won't like the TV or movies that star a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
female lead?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I don't. In fact, some of my favorite
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
movies and TV shows have female leads.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I don't know a single man who has ever
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
scoffed at the notion of watching a movie
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
or TV show just because it has a female
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
protagonist. However, I have seen
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
feminists scoff at anything with a male
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
lead.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why are you surprised when women are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
funny?" "I'm probably funnier than you!"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I'm not surprised when women are funny.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
There are plenty of funny women out there.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
[names not recognized], et cetera.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But I will say that, in general, women are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
not as funny as men, and I think most
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
women won't agree with that statement.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I also think there's a reason for this.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
See if you understand what humor is
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and how it works, which I'm guessing
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you don't because you're feminists,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
then you know that the things that make
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
laugh often have their roots in very dark
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
subject matter.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
To quote the amazing atheist,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"These people who are fucking offended
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
by rape jokes don't even understand
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
humor. They don't understand- They
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
think of humor as like a happy thing,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because humor makes us laugh and laughter
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
makes us happy, but a lot of the time
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
they don't seem to notice that what we're
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
actually laughing at is quite dark and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
morbid. Like if you actually look at it
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and examine the jokes, and look at the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
exaggeration and try to figure out the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
mechanics of how the joke works,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
why does it work; you're gonna find that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a lot of jokes have their genesis in pain
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and suffering. Because laughter is this
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
great transcendent tool we have, where
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we can take something that- that's bitter
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and difficult to comprehend or deal with,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and make it something funny.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Like if I take a joke like "How many
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
police officers does it take change a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
light bulb?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"None, they just beat the room for being
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
black." you know that joke has it's
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
genesis in some very serious, very dark
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
shit. And that joke is not making light
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of the fact that people have suffered,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
or it's not making light of the fact that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
people, you know, marched in the Civil
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Rights Movement, or- or that people are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
racial discriminated against, or police
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
brutality. It's not making light of any
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of that. What it's doing is it's taking
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that pain and it's taking that dark
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
subject matter, and it's helping us
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
transcend it for a moment. And view
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the absurdity of our circumstance.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Because that is what humor is supposed to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
do. Humor at it's best takes the elements
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of the world that are dark and horrible,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and shows you there absurdity. It shows
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you the absurdity of the human condition.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and that is important."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
See men are socially conditioned to not
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
talk openly and honestly about their
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
feelings, which I'll talk more about
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
later, and that's why we cultivate a sense
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of humor. The only way we can really talk
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
about the things that upset us is if
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we do it through the filter of comedy.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
But women have the clears throat
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"privilege" to not be subject to social
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
conditioning, and so they don't feel the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
need to cultivate a sense of humor.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And that's why women, in general, aren't
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
as funny and men. That isn't to say that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
all men are funny, or that all women are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
unfunny. It's just that in general men are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
funnier than women. I'm sorry but that's
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
how it is. Also no- I'd rather strongly
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
doubt that you're funnier than me.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And it's not because you're a women.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Just judging by how you look and talk,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I'm willing to bet that your sense of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
humor boils down to saying something rude,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and then following it with "Just kidding".
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I mean I'm not the funniest person in
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the world but if you think of yourself
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
as the funny one, you probably lack the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
objectivity to realizing that everybody
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
else in your circle of friends probably
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
thinks of you as the "annoying one".
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Just kidding, actually I'm not.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why do you think we're obsessed with you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
when we hook up?" "Nine times out of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
ten, I just want you to leave too, I'm
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
busy, I got shit to do."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Probably because you do shit like text
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
us 50 times in the space of one hour, and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
slash our tires when we dump you after you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
accuse us of cheating because you saw our
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
sister's name in our call history. Also
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
what shit could you possibly have to do?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Pluck your eyebrows to the point
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
where they're so unnaturally clean around
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the edges that they look like they're
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
drawn on? Spend your husband's money
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
on more frumpy sweaters? Buy a tub of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Ben & Jerry's and watch Glee? Or write
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
more questions for men to answer
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because you're so lacking in self
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
awareness that you can't figure out the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
answers for yourself?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why can't I sleep as many people as I
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
want to without being judged? When men do
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it, they're congratulated"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Go ahead and sleep with as many
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
people as you want. I don't give a shit,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but once again I don't know anybody who
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
would. The only time I would care is if I
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
was dating you, because if you told me
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you've been with 20 other guys before
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I met you, I would naturally assume that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
there was something wrong with you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
if you've been in so many relationships
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and have them all fail. Not to mention the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
fact that your substantially more
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
likely to be carrying an STD. And I think
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it's perfectly reasonable for a woman to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
view men who have slept with a lot of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
other women the same way. Also who's
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
congratulating men for sleeping around?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I don't see any guys walking around with
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
trophies for fucking everyone they've
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
met. It's not like having sex with easy
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
women is some kind of achievement.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Furthermore, I would say that most media
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
portrays men who do that as assholes
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who should be looked at with content.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I mean -name not recognized- isn't
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
exactly portrayed as a model citizen.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
By the way studies have found that the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
majority of people who slut shame women,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
are other women. Maybe you should be
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
directing this question at them and not
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
men.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why do you consider a woman a tease,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
if she does sleep with you after three
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
dates, but a slut if she sleeps with you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
on the first date?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Why do you consider a man a douchebag if
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
he doesn't call you back three days after
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
he meets you, but desperate if he calls
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you the next day?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"In what world does no mean yes?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"No means no."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I don't know anybody who thinks no
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
means yes. Also this question seems to be
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in the spirit of the feminist notion that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
all men are potential rapists. Which
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
simply isn't true. I already talked about
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
this at length in my other video, "'Teach
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
men not to rape' is a stupid rhetoric".
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Moving on.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why do you say that women are too
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
emotional to be leaders"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
whispering: maybe if feminist argued
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
with logics instead of feelings, people
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
wouldn't think that.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Then justify cat calling by saying
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
'men just can't control themselves'"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I've never heard a man say either, I have
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
hear women say both though.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why do you think that just because
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you're nice to me, I owe you my body?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Why do you think that just because I'm
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
nice to you that I want your body.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Sometimes I've been walking down the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
street, hysterically crying because my cat
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
was missing, and a man came up and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
was like 'Hey what's up, why are you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
crying? Can I talk to you?'
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"But I want to continue this, so when
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the guy up to you and asked you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
how you were doing, did you judge his
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
intentions, or do you feel like-"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"I was like what the hell is wrong with
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you I'm hysterically crying, holding
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
flyers that say missing cat."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Wait what if he was checking how you were
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
doing because you were crying?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"No he was- It was a catcall, it was like
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a 'Hey pretty lady, like what's going on-"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"What if he was trying to be sweet to get
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
into you, like 'hey pretty lady, why are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you crying?'"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"He's not entitled to my time, honestly"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"If he had not said anything to you, then
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
he's a dick because he's a guy in society
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who saw a girl crying and didn't do
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
anything."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"But it's a different- If he's saying that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to get my number, that's different that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
him coming up and saying 'Whats
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
wrong, if I see your cat around, I'll let
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you know. Like that's a different thing"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"But how is he going to know about your
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
cat, he saw a girl crying on the street"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Well, it was just- I was hanging up the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
flyers."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Now I'll now if I ever see a girl crying
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
on the street, and she's hysterical and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
she might've just lost her parents and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
has nobody, I shouldn't go up to her
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because she might think I'm objectify her"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"She doesn't know you. She doesn't know
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"But we're humans, we should care about
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
each other."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Of course, of course, but I think you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
have to understand what you come off
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
as to women. They don't know you. It's
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
like if a brown bear came up and said
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
hello to you. Like you just have to like-"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why would you ever send an unsolicited
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
dick pic?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I wouldn't. If you didn't give out your
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
phone number to the types of guys you meet
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
in night clubs, you know the type of guys
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who go to such clubs for the specific
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
purpose of meeting women, and who read
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
books about how to be a pick up artist;
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
maybe you wouldn't be getting dick pics
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
from them.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why do you feel like it's okay to harrass
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
women, or make offensive comments about
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
women, but when somebody does it to your
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
sister, it's not okay?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Why do you feel like it's okay to make
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
these misandrist videos which paint all
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
men as sexual harassers or rapists, but
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
when somebody treats your son that way,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it's not okay?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"How does it feel to interrupt me when
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I'm in the middle of making a point
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
during a meetings?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You make it sound like the only people
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who have ever interrupted you are men.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I smell confirmation bias. Hey have you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
ever stopped to think that maybe people
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
interrupt you because they realize you're
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
talking shit and wasting time after only
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
two sentences.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why do you have to sit with your legs
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
so wide open?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"I get that you have balls, but I don't
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
stand around with my arms wide open
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to make room for my boobs."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Maybe that's because your boobs don't get
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
squished between your arms when you stand
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
normally with your arms down by your
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
sides. A man's balls are literally between
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
his legs, and they do get squished if he
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
puts his legs together. It's not exactly
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
an apt comparison. Furthermore, why
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
do you even care? I don't see you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
complaining about women taking up
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
two seats with their bags.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why are women perceived as the weaker
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
sex? Even though we literally birth you,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
like watermelons through like 'this'"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Because physical strength has nothing to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
do with your ability to give birth. Women
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
are, generally speaking, not as physically
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
strong as men. The average man has about
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
50% greater upper body strength than the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
average woman. I'm sorry but that's just
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
simple biology. There's also the fact
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that men are by in large the one's who go
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to war and fight and die to protect you.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Men are the ones who work the dangerous
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
jobs to make your comfortable lifestyle in
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the industrialized world possible.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And historically men are also the ones
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who have gone out into the unforgiving
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
wilderness to kill dangerous animals so
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
ungrateful entitled women like you could
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
eat. You as a woman are substantially less
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
likely to die during your daily activities
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and you don't have to worry about being
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
called a deadbeat for not risking life in
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a factory or field for the benefit of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
others. Nor do you have to worry about
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
being told you don't have a real job
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because you work with computers or push
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
pencils in a safe, clean environment.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Women work soft cushy jobs compared to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
men and that's why women make only 7% of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
workplace fatalities despite making up 47%
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of the work force. That is why you're
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
perceived as the weaker sex. If you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
don't want people to see you that way,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
then get out of your comfortable air
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
conditioned studio and go work on a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
craving boat on a coal mine. You're
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
always complaining about employment
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
discrimination, so go ahead, take the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
dirty dangerous jobs and show us all just
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
how strong and tough you are. And look
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I don't begrudge women for working jobs
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that don't put them in danger and I will
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
freely admit that my job isn't
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
particularly dangerous; but if you're
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
going to sit there and act like women
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
are stronger than men just because you can
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
give birth, something which you have a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
0.0002 percent chance of dying from if you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
live in the United States, and that's up
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
from 15 years ago, then you can fuck right
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
off. By the way passing a kidney stone
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
hurts more than giving birth. Any woman
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who has experienced both will tell you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that, and men get them more often so
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
blow me.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why is it so bad to show your emotions?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"It means you're human."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Maybe it's because feminists like you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
tell us we're misogynists for even
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
daring to complain about our problems.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Since you're not a man and you don't have
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
even the slightest inclining of what it's
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
like to be a man, let me spell it out for
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you. Boys are socially conditioned from
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the day we learn to talk to not express
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
our feelings. We are [unknown] constantly
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
be told to man up and that boys don't cry.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
We don't have the privilege of showing
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
our emotions because if we do, it's a sign
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of weakness. To put it simply, us men are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
programmed to believe that our own
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
feelings are invalid, and so we hide them
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and we lie about them. We are raised to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
expect that if we tell you our feelings,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you will shoot them down. You will tell
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
us we're wrong for feeling the way we do,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and even if you don't, we still don't want
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to tell you our feelings because
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we know you'll use them against us.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You're probably thinking that you don't do
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that but you do, you do it all the time
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and don't even realize it. Ask yourself if
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you have ever had an argument
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
with one of them men in your life and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you told them "If you were a real man..."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
If you ever have then you have done
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
exactly what I'm talking about. See no
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
woman has ever been told "If you're
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a real woman you wouldn't feel this way"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Women have their feelings cultivated and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
coddled. You're not only allowed to cry.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you are expected to, and when you do,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
people around you give you sympathy and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you are comforted. You are so used to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
getting sympathy that you feel entitled
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to it. Men don't have that luxury. A man
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
fully expects to be looked down upon,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and told that his feelings don't matter if
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
he shows any sign of emotional weakness.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Even by the people he trusts most, because
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that is what he has experienced for
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
his entire life, and you wonder why the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
suicide rate for men is four times higher
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
than it is for women. I know what you're
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
going to say, you're going to say that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the social conditioning of men to not
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
show their emotions is part of the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
patriarchy, and feminism is fighting to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
change that. Good, what heroes you are,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
let me give you a little golf clap while
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you take a sip from your fucking
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
'Male Tears' mug while sitting in the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
comfort of your safe space, where
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
men aren't allowed.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why are you always trying to prove your
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
masculinity?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
See my answer to the previous question.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Also wow, how egocentric are you.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You are so certain that the world
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
revolves around you that you believe that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
when a man is acting like a man, that he
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
must be trying to prove something to you.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Like he couldn't possibly be acting like a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
man just because he's, you know, a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
fucking man. Why are you constantly trying
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to prove your femininity to me? How
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
bout that?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why the fuck isn't it lady like to cuss?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
When did words get gendered?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
It's also not considered gentlemen like
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to curse. Swearing is generally
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
considered rude regardless of the gender
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of the person who is doing it. Personally
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I don't give a shit if you use
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
profanity. Go right the fuck ahead.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And when did words get genered?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I guess right around the time the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
word feminist was invented, which is
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
at self a gendered word. I'm mean the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
invention of feminism is when everything
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
suddenly became gendered. Like when assert
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that interrupting people is somehow a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
uniquely male behavior, or that only
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
women get told not to swear.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why is it your first instinct to doubt
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
women who have been sexually violated or
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
raped?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Maybe a false rape accusation weren't
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
systemically encouraged by feminism,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
we wouldn't have a problem. Notice how
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
this question is phrased, to doubt women
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who have been sexually violated or raped.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
The more salient question would be,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
'Why do you doubt women who claim to have
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
been sexually violated or raped. And the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
answer is because we have this thing
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
called the presumption of innocence.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
That means a person who is accused of a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
crime is innocent until proven guilty.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So it's not my first instinct to doubt,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
it's my moral imperative to doubt until
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
evidence is forthcoming. You wouldn't put
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
somebody in jail just because somebody
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
accused them of murder nor would you put
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
them in jail just because somebody accused
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
them of theft, nor would you put them in
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
jail because somebody accused them of any
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
other crime. Why should accusations of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
rape be held to a different standard? This
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
really isn't a difficult concept to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
understand, and it both baffles me and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
disturbs me how often I see feminists
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
failing to grasp this. For people who
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
claim to fight for social justice, you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
really don't understand how justice works,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
do you? See a man who its accused of rape,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
will have his life ruined. That's not even
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
only if he is convicted, the mere
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
accusation is enough to cost him his job,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
his relationships, his education and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
career prospects, his home, his
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
reputation, and so on. If a woman wants
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to ruin a man's life all she has to do is
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
accuse him of raping her and he will be
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
put through the ringer by law enforcement
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and the media; and even if he is found not
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
guilty, the damage will have already been
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
done and the woman who made the false
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
accusation will get away scot free.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Really it astonishes me that even after
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
what happened at Duke and the University
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of Virginia, that you're still asking
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
this question. Furthermore, feminists
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
have abused the word rape to point where
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
its lost all meaning. Everything is rape.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Its gotten to the point where if a woman
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
claims she was raped I have to wonder
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
if she means a guy actually forcibly put
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
his penis in her, or if she had
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
consensual sex and just decided to call it
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
rape when she decided she regretted it the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
next morning, or if she's merely
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
complaining that a guy looked at her in
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a way that made her feel uncomfortable.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I mean what even is rape at this point?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
According to some feminists, it's rape if
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a man changed positions during sex without
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
forewarning. It's rape if your boyfriend
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
breaks up with you because you cheated on
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
him. It's rape if you overhear somebody
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
calling somebody else a slut.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"I got raped, when my mother called
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
someone else's daughter a slut."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Really it's your own damn fault that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
people are becoming increasingly reluctant
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
to believe rape accusations, because you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
have expanded the definition so broadly,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that nobody even knows when you're really
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
talking about rape anymore. You did this,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you asked for it, and now you have buyers
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
remorse. Now let me pose a question to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you, why is it your first instinct to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
doubt when a man says he was sexually
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
violated or raped by a woman.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why do you assume a woman is angry
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
because she's on her period?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Because women get angry when they're on
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
their period. It's a scientific fact that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the hormonal changes a woman experiences
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
during her period cause her to become
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
irritable. This is called premenstrual
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
syndrome, or PMS. However, I don't
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
always assume a woman is angry because
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
she is on her period. If your boyfriend
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
thinks that, then maybe it's because
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you're not being straight forward with him
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
and expecting him to be a mind reader.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Maybe you should try telling him why
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you're angry. Ever thought about that?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Ever thought about simply telling him that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you're mad that he ate the last
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Klondike bar or whatever trivial bullshit
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you're getting your panties in twist over.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
[mocking voice] "Awe he should just be
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
able to figure it out"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Yeah like you should be able to figure out
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the answers to these stupid questions
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you're asking.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why do you think women that wear makeup
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
are false advertising, we can say the same
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
thing about your dick size."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You actually answered the question
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
yourself. We consider it false
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
advertising for the same reason that you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
think a man who stuffs the crotch of his
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
pants is false advertising. If you cover
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
up all your pimples and scars with makeup
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you can't really be surprised when he's
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
taken aback upon discover that you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
don't really look the way you did when you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
first met. I mean wouldn't you feel like
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you were lied to if you met a guy who
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
looked well dressed and drove a nice car,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
but then you found out that he got his
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
clothes at goodwill, and he rented that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
car with his burger king salary.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why isn't it weird that there's a bunch
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
of old white men sitting in a room,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
making legislation about what I can and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
can't do with my body?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Wasn't it a room full of old white men
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that decided the Roe v. Wade ruling.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You know, women have had the right to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
vote for almost a hundred years now, and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
polling data has found that women are more
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
likely to vote than men; and yet these
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
old white men keep getting elected.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And I see a lot of you people supporting
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Bernie Sanders even though he looks pretty
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
fuckin old and white to me. Go figure.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Furthermore, why does it even matter that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
they're white? Why does their melanin
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
level matter more than the merit of their
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
ideas? Wasn't it Martin Luther King Jr.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who once said "I have a dream that my
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
four little children will one day live in
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a nation where they will not be judge by
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the color of their skin, but by the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
content of their character." For as much
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
as you people like to accuse other of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
being racist, you sure do judge people
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
based on their race a lot. Oh but it's
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
not racism when you do it because of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
power structures or some other mental
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
gymnastic bullshit, right? As if whether
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
or not the prejudice somebody is being
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
subjected to is institutionalized makes
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
any difference to them when it happens.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Fuck off. Racism is racism, regardless of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
who is doing it to whom. Calling it
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
something other than racism doesn't
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
change the fact that it's fucking racism;
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
And the only people who think otherwise
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
are racist like you. This mentality that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
only certain people can be racist hinges
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
on the categorization of people based on
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
their ethnicity, and the ascribing of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
attributes to them such as privilege,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
based on those racial categories. You
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
have to make judgements based on race to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
make this argument work, you have to make
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
assumptions and generalization about their
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
race and origin to make those judgments.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
So you have to be racist to use this
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
argument, how do you not see the problem
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
with this, how do you not see the problem
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
with putting people's race before the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
merits of their argument and categorizing
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
people into a hierarchy of consideration
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
based on their race. How the fuck do you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
expect to fight racism with racism, and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
then expect people to take you seriously.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Maybe this is the reason why you think
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that if somebody thinks that you're
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
stupid it must be because you're a woman.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
You're projecting, you judge other people
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
based on their race and gender so you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
assume other people are doing it to you.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Well I've got news for you, I don't think
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you're stupid because you're a woman, I
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
think you're stupid because you're stupid.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Anyway I'm getting off topic, it's not
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
like they don't also tell me what I can't
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
do with my body. For example, I can't take
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the palm of my hand and slap some sense
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
into you, without being considered
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
assault.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Do you have a coochie?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
No.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why are straight guys so obsessed with
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
lesbians?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Why are straight women so obsessed with
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
gay guys? Or better yet, why are women
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
so obsessed with lesbians? According to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Porn hub search data for 2014, the number
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
one thing women search for was lesbian
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
porn. Proportionately women look up
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
lesbian porn more than men do.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"How does it feel to get kicked in the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
balls?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
How do you think it feels, you dumb
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
bitch?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Do you ever get tired of being manly all
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
the time?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Do you? You're the one that's dressed like
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
a lumberjack. To answer the question, no,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
not really. It comes naturally to me
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
since I'm, you know, a man. The fact
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that you're asking this question implies
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
that you sometimes get tired of being
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
feminine, so do you ever get tired of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
being feminine all the time? Is that why
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you're dressed like a lumberjack?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Would you like to be a man?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Well you have to pass a test first. Have
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
you mastered the art of manspreading?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
Have you completed your forty hours of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
rape training?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
"Why are you so afraid of gender
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
equality?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
I'm not. You are. What I'm afraid of is
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
gender inequality. Which is what feminist
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
are actually pushing for. You want
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999
examples? In 2005, Swedish Politian and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
co-founder of feminist initiative,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Godrum Schyman, proposed what the media
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
called a man tax, which would have raised
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
taxes for men in Sweden. Basing it on the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
idea that all men should be held
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
accountable for all man on women violence.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
It should be noted that Schyman was
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
convicted of tax evasion in 2004, a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
year before making this proposal.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
In 2010, women's group leaders in Isreal
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
have unanimously opposed changes to rape
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
laws that would make it possible for
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
women to be convicted of rape. They
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
succeeded and now women in Israel commit
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
sex act on non-consenting adults or
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
children who are not old enough to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
legally give informed consent, are not
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
actually being charged with rape, and are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
instead charged with lesser crimes. In
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
2013 Indian feminists successfully
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
pressured the government to rewrite rape
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
laws in such a way that only men could be
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
charged with rape. In 2014, Jessica
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Valenti published an article in the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Guardian advocating paying men less than
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
women. In 2015, York University planned to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
hold an international men's day meant to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
highlight issues affecting men and boys,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
such as the high suicide rate, shorter
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
life expectancies, and struggles faced in
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
getting and education. It was canceled
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
after feminists student, staff, and alumni
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
protested and held a petition to ban it,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
which received almost 200 signatures.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
To add insult to injury, Holly Baxter
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
wrote a condescending article on
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Independent.co.uk enlightening readers
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
why we don't need an international men's
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
day. You can claim the definition of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
feminism is advocating gender equality
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
all you want, but actions speak louder than
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
words. And it's really hard to believe the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
feminist movement is really a movement
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
for equality, when you dismiss anyone who
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
brings up men's issues as misogynists.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
You say all men are rapists, you try to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
ban men from certain place son college
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
campuses, you actively fight against
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
father's rights, undermine the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
presumption of innocence when it comes
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
to rape accusations, and you deny
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
statistics about male victims of domestic
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
abuse. As well as protest and disrupt
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
conferences about male suicide.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"This is what mens' rights looks like"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"This is what mens' rights looks like"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"This is what mens' rights looks like"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
All that said, why are you so afraid of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
gender equality?
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"Why do I deserve to be paid less than
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
you?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"In what world does 77 cents equal a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
dollar?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"In what world does 68 cents equal a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
dollar?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"How is that fair?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
After I finished writing my answers to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
all these questions, I actually counted
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
them and realized there are only 33
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
questions, instead of 36. I just
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
naturally assumed these four questions
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
are actually one and answer them as such,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
but no. Buzzfeed actually considered this
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
compound question as a bunch of seperate
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
questions, in order to bolster their count
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
for their deceptive, click baiting title.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Like it wasn't bad enough that they're
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
already not even questions. Anyway, this
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
has been pointed out countless times by
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
countless other people, but the wage gap
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
is bullshit, and when I say it's bullshit
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
I don't mean that it doesn't exist.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
I mean it's bullshit because of the way
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
it's presented. The observed wage gap it
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
based on comparing the average income of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
men to the average income of women without
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
considering any variables. Sometimes when
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
the wage gap is brought up they add women
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
get paid less for the same jobs, but
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
that's horseshit. Asking women why they
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
get paid less than men is like asking why
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
men are more likely to die in the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
workplace than women. It's because men
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
and women tend to work different jobs;
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
and just like some jobs are more dangerous
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
than others, some jobs pay more than
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
others. And since men tend to work
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
higher paying jobs, such as those in STEM
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
fields, men tend to make more money.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
And even when you are comparing men and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
women working the same jobs, there are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
things which factor into why men get paid
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
more. Such as the fact that men are more
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
likely to work overtime, or more likely
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
to ask for raises or promotions, or less
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
likely to take time off, or more
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
competitive, or more likely to take risks,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
prioritize earnings more than women,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
retire at a later age, and all these other
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
things which studies have found. With all
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
this taken into consideration, it's no
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
wonder that men get paid more, men work
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
more. And really I hate to point out this
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
obvious bit of common sense, but if
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
companies could actually get away with
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
paying women less, don't you think they
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
would just hire nothing but women to save
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
money. Do you honestly think that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
corporations are such boys clubs that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
giving advantages to men is more important
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
to them than their profits and shareholder
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
interests. Don't be stupid. And no the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
fact that there are so few women in STEM
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
fields has nothing to do with
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
discrimination. In fact, surveys have
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
found that there is a 2 to 1 preference
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
for female applicants in STEM fields
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
over equally qualified men. So the reason
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
that there are so few women in STEM
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
fields is because few women are interested
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
in pursuing careers in STEM fields. If you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
want more women in STEM fields, then maybe
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
you shouldn't have wasted your parents
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
money on a degree in gender studies.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
And if you wish to continue pushing this
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
baseless contention that the patriarchy
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
is keeping women out of STEM fields, then
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
explain why the patriarchy isn't stopping
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
women from dominating certain fields
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
such as veterinary, medicine, psychology,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
pharmacology, and biology. Furthermore,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
which is it, 77 cents to a dollar or 68
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
cents. I've also heard other feminists
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
claim 72 cents. The fact that you can't
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
keep your story straight kind of says
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
something about it. And I'm really
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
struggling to understand why you thought
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
including this discrepancy in your video
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
was a good idea. Maybe you should have
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
let a man proofread it. (whispering) that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
was a joke. I know I have to explain it
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
because feminists don't understand jokes,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
but it was a joke, alright.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"Why are you intimidated by a woman who
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
makes more money than you? That's
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
awesome! More money"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
I'm not, but since we're making
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
assumptions, why are you intimidated
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
by my deep, booming, commanding, yet
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
sultry baritone voice.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"Why are opiniated women seen as bitches?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"When opiniated men are seen as bosses."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Opiniated men aren't seen as bosses unless
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
they actually are somebody's boss.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Otherwise they are just called assholes.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Unless of course their opinions disagree
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
with you. In which case they are kicked
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
off of campus, banned from speaking at
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
events, and told to stop mansplaining.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Maybe that's why opiniated women like you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
are seen as bitches.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"Why aren't you speaking up when you hear
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
your male friends behind closed doors,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
make jokes that are offensive to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
women?"
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Because they're jokes, and they aren't
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
meant to be taken seriously.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"These people who are fucking offended by
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
rape jokes don't even understand humor."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
If that's not a good enough answer, then
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
let me ask you this, do you speak up when
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
your female friends make jokes that are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
offensive to men, no? Why not? Oh because
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
it's empowering right? Fuck off. Also I
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
thought you said you were probably funnier
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
than me? You think of yourself as a funny
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
woman but you don't want people making
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
jokes that don't cater to your own
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
personal taste. Stop trying to please
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
other people's speech, you empty
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
headed bimbo. (Horn blaring)
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"Why are you so afraid of recognizing
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
your own privilege? Doesn't mean you're a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
bad person, just recognizing it and do
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
something about it."
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
I just love how you boldly assert that I
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
have privilege without backing up that
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
assertion at all. And then pursue to talk
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
down to me in this condescending tone,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
like it's just so obvious it's such an
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
unassailable argument. (mocking voice)
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
It doesn't mean you're a bad person.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
But I guess being the same gender as
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Donald Trump does. To answer your
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
question, it's because I don't have
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
privilege, I really don't, but you do.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
I defy you name one, just one, legal
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
privilege that I have, which you don't
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
also have. Because I can think of several
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
you have which I don't have. Let me list
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
ten. Women are almost always granted
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
custody of children in a divorce by
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
default unless the man can prove she is
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
unfit to care for them. See
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
misrepresentation of gender bias
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
committee of Massachusetts Supreme Court
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
by Mark B Rosenthal, this is despite
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
the fact that children are twice as
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
likely to be abused by their mother than
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
they are by their father. According to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
page 49 of Child Maltreatment 2013
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
published by the US Department of Health
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
and Human Services. Women have more
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
social safety nets designed for them,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
which is why they only make up 24% of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
the homeless population. This is in spite
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
of the fact that 42% of homeless men are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
employed, versus only 27% of homeless
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
women. This is according to page 2 of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"Who's Homeless" published by the National
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Coalition for the Homeless, July 2009 and
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
page 1 of "Single Males: The Homeless
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Majority" published by Healing Hands
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
in June 2001. Women get more lenient
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
sentences for equivalent crimes. See
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Criminal Cases" by Sonja B Starr in 2012.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
A woman could get a male coworker fired
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
from his job simply by accusing him of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
sexual harassment even without proving it.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
It's so easy for a woman to get a man
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
fired at a malice, and it happens so
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
often that men are now starting to avoid
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
women all together in the workplace.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Refusing to mentor or help them.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Kim Elsesser talks about this in her book,
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
"Sex in the office" 2015. In California, a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
woman can declare a man to be the father
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
of her child and sue him for child
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
support and it's up to the man to prove
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
he isn't the father by taking a DNA test.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
And he only gets 30 days to do so, if he
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
doesn't do it in that time, then a court
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
can declare him responsible for the child
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
even if he proves he isn't the father
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
later. A woman can sue a sperm donner for
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
child support. A woman who gets
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
pregnant with stolen sperm, can sue the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
man she stole it from for child support.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
And before you argue that a man should
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
keep it in his pants so he doesn't want to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
be a father, imagine if you heard a
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
conservative Christian arguing against
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
abortion by saying 'women should keep
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
their legs together if they don't want to
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
be mothers' I think you would lose your
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
shit. A woman who get pregnant by raping
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
a man or an underage boy can sue him for
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
child support. See Hermesmann V Seyer.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
A woman could get an abortion in
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
complete disregard for the wishes of the
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
father, she doesn't even have to tell
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
she's seeking an abortion. A woman can
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
also sue the father for child support if
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
he wants nothing to do with the child.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
So basically a woman can opt out of
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
parenthood but a man cannot.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Domestic violence against women is
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
actually taken seriously. Men are always
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
presumed to be the aggressors in
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
domestic violence cases. Despite the fact
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
that CDC statistics have found that more
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
than 70% of non reciprocated domestic
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
violence is perpetuated by women.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
Even when a man is recognized as a being
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
a victim of domestic abuse, he is almost
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
always presumed to be at fault.
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
People ask 'What did he do to piss her
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
off?'
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
So let me pose a question to you, Why are
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
you so afraid of recognizing your
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
privilege? It doesn't mean you're a bad
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
person. Just recognize it and do something
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
about it. Or don't, I already know you
99:59:59.999 --> 99:59:59.999 line:1
won't.