Return to Video

Why a Negative Times a Negative Makes Intuitive Sense

  • 0:00 - 0:03
    So you, as the ancient philosopher in mathematics
  • 0:03 - 0:07
    have concluded in order for the multiplication of positive and negative numbers to be
  • 0:07 - 0:10
    consistent with everything you've been constructing so far
  • 0:10 - 0:14
    with all the other properties of multiplication that you know so far
  • 0:14 - 0:17
    that you need a negative number times a positive
  • 0:17 - 0:21
    number or a positive times a negative to give you a negative number
  • 0:21 - 0:24
    and a negative times a negative
  • 0:24 - 0:28
    to give you a positive number and so you accept
  • 0:28 - 0:31
    it's all consistent so far.. this deal does not make complete concrete
  • 0:31 - 0:36
    sense to you, you want to have a slightly deeper institution than just having to accept its
  • 0:36 - 0:40
    consistent with the distributive property and whatever else and so you try another
  • 0:40 - 0:45
    thought experiment, you say "well what is just a basic multiplication way of doing it?"
  • 0:45 - 0:47
    So if I say, two times
  • 0:47 - 0:51
    three, one way to
  • 0:51 - 0:55
    to conceptualize is basic multiplication is really repeating
  • 0:55 - 0:58
    addition, so you could view this as two threes
  • 0:58 - 1:02
    so let me write three plus three
  • 1:02 - 1:06
    and notice there are two of them, there are two of these
  • 1:06 - 1:10
    or you could view this as three twos, and so this is the same thing as
  • 1:10 - 1:13
    two plus two plus two and there are
  • 1:13 - 1:17
    three of them, and either way you can conceptualize
  • 1:17 - 1:21
    as you get the same exact answer. This is going to be equal
  • 1:21 - 1:25
    to six, fair enough!
  • 1:25 - 1:28
    Now, you knew this before you even tried to tackle negative numbers.
  • 1:28 - 1:31
    Now let's try to make one of these negatives and see what
  • 1:31 - 1:33
    happens. Let's do two
  • 1:33 - 1:36
    times negative
  • 1:36 - 1:42
    three, I want to make the negative into a different color. Two times
  • 1:42 - 1:46
    negative three.
  • 1:46 - 1:50
    Well, one way you could view this is the same analogy
  • 1:50 - 1:53
    here, it's negative three twice so it would be
  • 1:53 - 1:57
    negative.. I'll try to color code it
  • 1:57 - 2:01
    negative three and then another negative
  • 2:01 - 2:05
    three or you could say negative three minus three
  • 2:05 - 2:09
    or, and this is the interesting thing, instead of
  • 2:09 - 2:11
    over here there's a two times positive three
  • 2:11 - 2:14
    you added two, three times.
  • 2:14 - 2:16
    But since here is two times negative three
  • 2:16 - 2:19
    you could also imagine you are going to subtract two, three times
  • 2:19 - 2:22
    So instead of up here, I could
  • 2:22 - 2:27
    written two plus two plus two because this is a positive
  • 2:27 - 2:29
    two right over here, but since we're doing this over negative three
  • 2:29 - 2:34
    we could imagine subtracting two, three times, so this would be
  • 2:34 - 2:38
    subtracting two (repeated)
  • 2:38 - 2:43
    subtract another two right over here, subtract another two
  • 2:43 - 2:46
    and then you subtract another two
  • 2:46 - 2:55
    notice you did it, once again, you did it
  • 2:55 - 3:00
    three times, so this is a negative three, so essentially you are subtracting
  • 3:00 - 3:04
    two, three times. And either way, you can conceptualize
  • 3:04 - 3:07
    right over here, you are going to get negative six
  • 3:07 - 3:10
    negative six is the answer.
  • 3:10 - 3:16
    Now, so you are already starting to feel better about this part right over here
  • 3:16 - 3:18
    negative times a positive, or a positive times a negative
  • 3:18 - 3:22
    is going to give you a negative. Now lets take to the really un-intuitive one
  • 3:22 - 3:25
    and measure negative times a negative, and all of a sudden negatives kind of cancel
  • 3:25 - 3:28
    to give you a positive. Now why is that the case? Well we can just build from
  • 3:28 - 3:31
    this example right over here. Let's say we had
  • 3:31 - 3:36
    a negative two, lets say we had
  • 3:36 - 3:38
    negative two, let me do it a different color,
  • 3:38 - 3:43
    let's say we had a negative two, I already used this color
  • 3:43 - 3:45
    negative two times
  • 3:45 - 3:49
    negative three.
  • 3:49 - 3:54
    So now, we can d- actually I'll do this one first.
  • 3:54 - 3:58
    Let's do multiplying something by negative three so we'll
  • 3:58 - 4:01
    repeatedly subtract that thing three times whatever that thing is
  • 4:01 - 4:06
    so now the thing isn't a positive two so the thing over
  • 4:06 - 4:09
    here is a positive two but the thing we're going to subtract is a negative two
  • 4:09 - 4:11
    So let me make it clear, this says we are going to subtract something
  • 4:11 - 4:14
    three times, so we subtract something three times, so
  • 4:14 - 4:17
    subtracting something (repeatedly) three times
  • 4:17 - 4:21
    That's what this part right over here tells us
  • 4:21 - 4:24
    and we'll do this, exactly three times
  • 4:24 - 4:28
    Over here, it was a positive two we subtracted three times, now we're going to
  • 4:28 - 4:32
    do a negative two, now we're going to do a negative two
  • 4:32 - 4:36
    and we know from subtracting negative numbers, we already
  • 4:36 - 4:39
    built this intuition that subtracting a negative is the same thing
  • 4:40 - 4:46
    it's the same thing as adding a positive, and so this
  • 4:46 - 4:50
    this is going to be the same thing as two plus two plus two and
  • 4:50 - 4:54
    we're told once again, gives you a positive
  • 4:54 - 4:57
    six, you can same use the same logic over here, now
  • 4:57 - 5:00
    instead of adding negative three twice, really I could have written this as
  • 5:00 - 5:04
    negative three as this example
  • 5:04 - 5:06
    negative three
  • 5:06 - 5:12
    negative three, and we added it
  • 5:12 - 5:15
    we added it, now let me put a plus here to make it clear
  • 5:15 - 5:19
    over here we added it twice, we added negative three
  • 5:19 - 5:23
    two times, or here since we have a negative two, we're going to subtract
  • 5:23 - 5:26
    to negative three twice, so we're going to subtract something
  • 5:26 - 5:30
    and we're going to subtract something again, and that something is going to be
  • 5:30 - 5:33
    our negative three, it's going to be our negative three, so
  • 5:33 - 5:37
    negative, negative and put our three right over here
  • 5:37 - 5:41
    and once again, subtracting negative three is like taking away
  • 5:41 - 5:43
    someone's debt, which is essentially giving them money,
  • 5:43 - 5:48
    this is the same thing as adding three plus three which is once again six. So now
  • 5:48 - 5:51
    you, the ancient philosopher, feel pretty good. Not only this
  • 5:51 - 5:55
    all consistent with all the mathematics you know
  • 5:55 - 5:58
    the distributive property is also the property of multiplying something
  • 5:58 - 6:01
    times something all these things you already know, and now
  • 6:01 - 6:05
    this actually makes conceptual sense to you, this is actually very consistent with
  • 6:05 - 6:08
    with your notations, your original notations, or one of the positive notations
  • 6:08 - 6:12
    of multiplication which is as repeated addition
Title:
Why a Negative Times a Negative Makes Intuitive Sense
Description:

Using the repeated addition model of multiplication to think about multiplying negative numbers

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
06:14
Hitoshi Yamauchi edited English subtitles for Why a Negative Times a Negative Makes Intuitive Sense
merguson added a translation

English subtitles

Revisions