< Return to Video

Veri Görselleştirme Bileşenleri | Veri, Kitle, Amaç #8

  • 60:00 - 60:04
    So when we're looking
  • 60:04 - 60:07
    at our data and and looking to
  • 60:07 - 60:09
    communicate with it
  • 60:09 - 60:12
    i see there is being three key
  • 60:12 - 60:14
    areas that we want to
  • 60:14 - 60:17
    we want to focusing on.
  • 60:17 - 60:18
    We want to look at the data
  • 60:18 - 60:20
    and we really need to understand the
  • 60:20 - 60:22
    data.
  • 60:22 - 60:25
    We need to consider our purpose.
  • 60:25 - 60:29
    What are we trying to achieve with this data?
  • 60:29 - 60:31
    And we need to consider our audience.
  • 60:31 - 60:34
    Who is it that we're trying to communicate to?
  • 60:37 - 60:40
    And if we look at data for instance to
  • 60:40 - 60:42
    start with.
  • 60:42 - 60:46
    Here we have a chart of the
  • 60:46 - 60:49
    tv ratings for the Simpsons.
  • 60:49 - 60:51
    And we can see around 2001
  • 60:51 - 60:54
    there seems to be a big increase in the
  • 60:54 - 60:55
    ratings of the
  • 60:55 - 60:57
    television show.
  • 60:57 - 60:58
    And that ratings increase
  • 60:58 - 61:00
    might tell us that the television
  • 61:00 - 61:03
    show got better.
  • 61:03 - 61:05
    But we should ask ourselves:
  • 61:05 - 61:07
    Is that reasonable?
  • 61:07 - 61:09
    Did this television show suddenly get
  • 61:09 - 61:11
    that much better? And did everybody
  • 61:11 - 61:12
    immediately understand that it was that
  • 61:12 - 61:14
    much better?
  • 61:14 - 61:17
    That doesn't really make sense.
  • 61:17 - 61:20
    When we go and we examine the data and
  • 61:20 - 61:22
    we talk to the experts we find out
  • 61:22 - 61:25
    what really happened there was
  • 61:25 - 61:26
    the way Nielsen
  • 61:26 - 61:29
    takes care of their tv ratings they
  • 61:29 - 61:32
    changed how they collected the data.
  • 61:32 - 61:33
    And that change in data collection is what's
  • 61:33 - 61:34
    responsible
  • 61:34 - 61:38
    for this jump in ratings,
  • 61:38 - 61:42
    not the actual content of the television show.
  • 61:42 - 61:44
    So we should be asking ourselves:
  • 61:44 - 61:47
    Where did this data come from?
  • 61:47 - 61:50
    How was this data collected?
  • 61:50 - 61:52
    What is actually being measured?
  • 61:52 - 61:54
    And does it make sense?
  • 61:54 - 61:56
    Is it reasonable
  • 61:56 - 61:58
    when we're examining our data?
  • 61:59 - 62:01
    We should also be considering our
  • 62:01 - 62:02
    audience.
  • 62:02 - 62:06
    This chart type is called a tailor plot.
  • 62:06 - 62:10
    And it makes a lot of sense
  • 62:10 - 62:13
    if you are environmental scientist.
  • 62:13 - 62:14
    But if you are
  • 62:14 - 62:16
    even if you're someone like me who looks
  • 62:16 - 62:18
    at charts every day
  • 62:18 - 62:20
    all day, i still have no idea how to
  • 62:20 - 62:22
    interpret this.
  • 62:22 - 62:24
    And if you're going to present to the
  • 62:24 - 62:26
    lay audience
  • 62:26 - 62:27
    This is not an effective tool for
  • 62:27 - 62:29
    communication.
  • 62:29 - 62:32
    So you need to be asking questions like:
  • 62:32 - 62:34
    What is the knowledge and expertise of
  • 62:34 - 62:35
    my audience?
  • 62:35 - 62:38
    And how interested and invested are they
  • 62:38 - 62:40
    in the topic or the data?
  • 62:40 - 62:43
    How familiar are they withthe data?
  • 62:43 - 62:45
    How familiar are they with the visuals
  • 62:45 - 62:48
    that you're using?
  • 62:48 - 62:50
    And what kind of context will be helpful
  • 62:50 - 62:52
    to them?
  • 62:52 - 62:54
    And also you should be,
  • 62:54 - 62:55
    in a lot of cases,
  • 62:55 - 62:56
    with business applications,
  • 62:56 - 62:58
    you should be trying to answer:
  • 62:58 - 63:01
    What decision are they trying to make?
  • 63:01 - 63:04
    Which leads us nicely into sort of the
  • 63:04 - 63:07
    last aspect of our venn diagram:
  • 63:07 - 63:08
    Purpose.
  • 63:08 - 63:11
    We want to very much consider
  • 63:11 - 63:13
    the purpose of our visuals when looking
  • 63:13 - 63:14
    at them.
  • 63:14 - 63:16
    Here we have an article where the
  • 63:16 - 63:18
    visuals seem to
  • 63:18 - 63:20
    contradict the purpose.
  • 63:20 - 63:22
    This is a visual about
  • 63:22 - 63:25
    how there are still considerably
  • 63:25 - 63:27
    fewer female CEOs
  • 63:27 - 63:31
    in fortune 500 companies.
  • 63:31 - 63:32
    And the article is talking about
  • 63:32 - 63:34
    how the glass ceiling persists.
  • 63:34 - 63:36
    The number of females is
  • 63:36 - 63:38
    still much smaller than would be
  • 63:38 - 63:40
    expected.
  • 63:40 - 63:43
    However this precipitous rise in the
  • 63:43 - 63:45
    number of female CTOs that the chart
  • 63:45 - 63:46
    gives the impression of
  • 63:46 - 63:49
    seems to contradict that message that
  • 63:49 - 63:51
    they're trying to get across.
  • 63:51 - 63:54
    When we consider our purpose
  • 63:54 - 63:57
    some simple changes to the chart...
  • 63:57 - 63:59
    This is the exact same data
  • 63:59 - 64:02
    But we've given some context say there
  • 64:02 - 64:04
    are fifty percent of people are female
  • 64:04 - 64:08
    so uh let's let's set the axis at fifty
  • 64:08 - 64:09
    percent.
  • 64:09 - 64:10
    And now we can see that it has been
  • 64:10 - 64:13
    rising but that there is still
  • 64:13 - 64:16
    a considerable amount of difference
  • 64:16 - 64:18
    between the number of female CEOs and
  • 64:18 - 64:20
    male CEOs.
  • 64:20 - 64:23
    And so we get the context of it but it
  • 64:23 - 64:24
    doesn't
  • 64:24 - 64:26
    contradict the purpose or the message of
  • 64:26 - 64:27
    this article
  • 64:27 - 64:33
    that was written by the Reuters people.
  • 64:33 - 64:36
    So when we're considering our purpose,
  • 64:36 - 64:37
    we should be looking at the different
  • 64:37 - 64:40
    types of visuals that there are out there.
  • 64:41 - 64:43
    the Financial Times has put together a
  • 64:43 - 64:45
    wonderful, what they call the visual
  • 64:45 - 64:46
    vocabulary
  • 64:46 - 64:51
    available at ft.com/vocabulary.
  • 64:51 - 64:53
    It provides a number of
  • 64:53 - 64:56
    different visual types that you can use
  • 64:56 - 64:59
    to convey your data and the purposes
  • 64:59 - 65:01
    that they are good for showing.
  • 65:01 - 65:03
    So if we're looking to convey
  • 65:03 - 65:04
    ranking,
  • 65:04 - 65:08
    we can use a number of charts from this
  • 65:08 - 65:10
    column here. If we're looking at
  • 65:10 - 65:12
    displaying the distribution
  • 65:12 - 65:13
    these chart types might be more
  • 65:13 - 65:15
    effective for us.
  • 65:15 - 65:17
    And so i encourage you to explore the
  • 65:17 - 65:19
    different chart types and make sure
  • 65:19 - 65:28
    that they match with your visuals.
  • 65:28 - 65:32
    So just to sum it up,
  • 65:32 - 65:34
    when we're creating our visuals we're
  • 65:34 - 65:36
    not looking to
  • 65:36 - 65:39
    to dress them up. We're looking to
  • 65:39 - 65:42
    pare them down to that core message,
  • 65:42 - 65:43
    and really
  • 65:43 - 65:46
    cut away the excess and highlight the
  • 65:46 - 65:49
    the important. And with that we create
  • 65:49 - 65:52
    this sort of diamonds of knowledge
  • 65:52 - 65:54
    that we really want our audience to
  • 65:54 - 65:56
    get.
  • 65:57 - 65:59
    If you want to learn more about how to
  • 65:59 - 66:01
    present with data
  • 66:01 - 66:03
    these are two books that really got me
  • 66:03 - 66:04
    started.
  • 66:04 - 66:06
    Presentation zen is about
  • 66:06 - 66:08
    presentation visuals but has
  • 66:08 - 66:12
    a number, a chapter devoted to
  • 66:12 - 66:14
    visuals with data.
  • 66:14 - 66:16
    And then
  • 66:16 - 66:18
    "Show me the numbers" is a fantastic book
  • 66:18 - 66:20
    by Stephen Few where he
  • 66:20 - 66:23
    gets more into the science behind
  • 66:23 - 66:26
    why some methods work and others
  • 66:26 - 66:27
    don't and
  • 66:27 - 66:30
    does a fantastic job of very clearly
  • 66:30 - 66:35
    laying out how to effectively design
  • 66:35 - 66:39
    tables and graphs that in life.
  • 66:39 - 66:44
    We also put together a notes page
  • 66:44 - 66:47
    that you all can access at this address.
  • 66:47 - 66:48
    You type that in there it's a
  • 66:48 - 66:52
    google document. It has links to
  • 66:52 - 66:56
    a number of different visuals from
  • 66:56 - 66:57
    this presentation
  • 66:57 - 67:00
    as well as blog pieces, blog articles
  • 67:00 - 67:02
    that i've written.
  • 67:02 - 67:06
    And uh you can use that to sort of
  • 67:06 - 67:07
    highlight the the items in this
  • 67:07 - 67:10
    presentation. I've given longer
  • 67:10 - 67:11
    versions of this presentation and so
  • 67:11 - 67:14
    there will be some additional
  • 67:14 - 67:16
    information available to you at those
  • 67:16 - 67:18
    notes.
  • 67:18 - 67:21
    And that's that's basically it for
  • 67:21 - 67:23
    what i have
  • 67:23 - 67:25
    have to present.
Title:
Veri Görselleştirme Bileşenleri | Veri, Kitle, Amaç #8
Video Language:
English
Duration:
07:25

English subtitles

Revisions