-
Last time, we discussed what arguments are
-
for, their purposes.
We saw that arguments have at least three
-
purposes,
namely, persuasion, justification, and
-
explanation.
We also saw that one way to explain
-
something is to cite its purpose.
So, we can understand why Joe went to the
-
store by seeing that he went to the store
because he wanted some milk.
-
So his purpose was to get milk.
Similarly, we can understand arguments by
-
looking at their purposes, and that's what
we did last time.
-
But this time,
we're looking at a different kind of
-
explanation.
And as we saw, one way to explain things
-
is to look at the material.
So you want to understand why a MacBook
-
Air is so light, the answer is, it's made
out of aluminum.
-
Similarly, if we want to understand
arguments, we're going to gain understanding
-
by looking carefully at the material that
they're made out of.
-
And we saw that arguments are sets of
sentences, statements, and propositions.
-
So that means they're made out of
language.
-
So, in this lecture, and the next few,
we're going to look at the nature of
-
language in order to better understand
arguments.
-
So, if we know that arguments are made out
of language, we know that the only
-
creatures who can give arguments are ones
that can use language.
-
Now some people think that other animals
can use language, and there's a minimum
-
kind of language that other animals can
use.
-
But other animals cannot use language
that's complex enough to make argument
-
with.
It might seem that there's some
-
exceptions.
Here's one possibility.
-
But no matter what it sounds
-
like, this goat is not really arguing.
Maybe he's fighting, maybe he's fending
-
off what he takes to be an enemy, but he's
not arguing.
-
So, if other animals can use language, we
can't define humans as the animal that
-
talks.
But we can define humans as the animal
-
that argues,
or as Aristotle said, the rational animal,
-
the animal that reasons, because other
animals don't do that.
-
Humans are the only one that argues and
reasons in this sense.
-
So,
we can understand humans and arguments
-
better if we understand language better.
Now I can't tell you everything that needs
-
to be said about language.
You'd need to take a linguistics course
-
for that.
And I recommend that you try one,
-
because it's very interesting.
But here I'm only going to be able to make
-
four basic points about language.
First of all, language is important.
-
Second, it's conventional.
Third, it's representational.
-
And fourth, it's social.
That should at least get us going in
-
understanding what arguments are made of.
First, language is important.
-
It would be extremely difficult to live
life without language.
-
Just try to imagine what it would be like.
It's really hard to imagine.
-
But think about someone like Helen Keller,
who was born able to see and hear, but
-
very shortly thereafter lost her ability
to see and hear.
-
It was only much later in life that she
gained the ability to use language,
-
because she never had that in her early
years.
-
And when she gained that ability, she was
amazed.
-
W, a, t, e, r, water.
It has a name.
-
W, a, t.
-
When Helen Keller gained the ability to
use language and to communicate, she
-
didn't become able to see or hear.
She still couldn't see or hear, but she
-
could do amazing things.
She went around the country giving
-
presentations.
She graduated from Radcliffe College.
-
All of that was made available to her,
simply by adding language and
-
communication to her life.
So language is extremely useful, and that
-
explains why it's all around us.
Just imagine walking down the streets of
-
the city and all the signs that you'd see.
You just see words here, there and
-
everywhere.
And now we have a mystery.
-
If we're not paying attention to language,
then how can we use it so well to achieve
-
so many purposes?
The answer to that lies in the second
-
general feature of language that I want to
talk about, namely, language is
-
conventional.
But what's a convention?
-
Remember that in the United States people
drive on the right-hand side of the road.
-
That's our convention.
But what does that mean?
-
It means that there's a general pattern of
behavior that most people throughout
-
society obey on a regular basis, and they
criticize people who deviate from that
-
pattern.
And the same applies to language.
-
We have certain patterns of using words in
certain ways, and when people deviate from
-
those patterns we criticize them.
We say they're misspeaking or it's
-
ungrammatical.
Of course, conventions can vary.
-
Everybody knows that there are many
countries around the world where people
-
don't drive on the right-hand side of the
road, they drive on the left-hand side of
-
the road.
United Kingdom's one of them, but there
-
are lots more.
And the same applies to language.
-
You can have the same word that's used to
mean very different things in different
-
languages.
Most notorious example is football.
-
In the United States it's used to refer to
American Football whereas in the rest of
-
the world it's used to refer to what
Americans call soccer.
-
And people in the rest of the world think
that America is kind of silly because you
-
don't use your feet on the ball except for
punting and placekicking in football.
-
But whether it makes sense or not the
point here is simply that the conventions
-
can vary from one part of the world to the
other.
-
And of course, you can do that with any
word.
-
You could, in English, use the word, money
to refer to socks. At least the English
-
language could've done that.
It could've done that.
-
It didn't, but it could've.
So, in this way, conventions seem to be
-
kind of arbitrary.
They could've been very different.
-
But language is far from completely
arbitrary, because the conventions of
-
language have limits, and two of these
limits that I want to emphasize come from
-
the fact that language is also
representational and social.
-
So first language is representational.
When we use language, we're often trying
-
to refer to objects in the world, and
describe facts in the world.
-
And you can't change those objects or
those facts merely by changing your
-
language.
One good story to illustrate this is about
-
the young Lincoln.
When he was a lawyer, he supposedly
-
examined a witness during a trial, and he
said,
-
Okay, how many legs does a horse have?
And the witness said, Four.
-
And then Lincoln said, Well,
if we call a tail a leg, then how many
-
legs does a horse have?
And the witness said, Well,
-
then I suppose the horse would have five
legs.
-
And Lincoln said, Absolutely not.
That's wrong.
-
Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a
leg.
-
And the point of this story, whether it's
true historically or not, is that language
-
cannot change the facts of the world.
It can't make horses have five legs, if
-
you merely change your language.
Here's another example.
-
Suppose that you don't have much money,
But you happen to have a lot of socks in
-
your drawer.
Well, you could say, I'm going to use the
-
word money to refer to socks.
And now all of a sudden I've got lots of
-
money.
I'm not poor anymore.
-
It ain't going to work,
and that's because language, again, can't
-
change your financial situation
because that's a fact about the world,
-
not about how you're using the word socks
or the word money.
-
And the other limit on the conventions of
language comes from the fact that language
-
is social.
Sure, sometimes we talk to ourselves and
-
use language to write things down, write
notes to ourselves, for example, without
-
other people around but basically language
evolved because of its social function.
-
What that means is that there's a point in
following the conventions of the language
-
as shared by the rest of that society that
speaks that language.
-
I've always thought that it was
kind of silly that grapefruits are called
-
grapefruits.
Sure, they're fruits, but they don't look
-
like grapes at all.
They look more like lemons.
-
They're like really big lemons, and
that's why I think they ought to be called
-
mega lemons.
But If I went to a restaurant, and I
-
wanted to order grapefruit juice, so I
turned to the service person and
-
said, I'd like some mega lemon juice, I
probably wouldn't get what I wanted.
-
And so even if I think the language is not
using the right conventions, there's a
-
point in following the conventions of the
language in order to be able to
-
communicate with other people and get what
I want.
-
And again, the great philosophers Monty
Python saw this very well, when they
-
produced their little clip called, The Man
Who Speaks Only In Anagrams.
-
Our first guest into the studio tonight is
a man who talks entirely in anagrams.
-
Patsee Greot.
Do you enjoy this?
-
I dom certainlyodd revychumso.
What's your name?
-
Hamrack, Hamrack Yeterot.
So the point is obvious.
-
Language is shared and once it's shared
then it make sense to actually follow the
-
conventions of society even if you don't
like them.
-
Overall then, language is important, and
it's conventional in ways that might seem
-
arbitrary,
but actually, is limited in important ways
-
by the fact that language is also
representational and social.
-
But it's kind of cheap to say language is
conventional.
-
Which are the conventions?
Which are the rules that language follows?
-
And this is actually extremely complex,
because language follows rules or
-
conventions at many different levels.
Just take a real simple example.
-
You walk into a pizza shop and you say,
Gimme pepperoni.
-
Well, the person then fixes a pepperoni
pizza.
-
And you pay for it.
But how did that work?
-
That you said, Gimme pepperoni.
Well, first of all notice, that you had to
-
use words that were meaningful to the
person you were speaking to.
-
Gimme wasn't a word in English, a long
time ago,
-
but this person understands gimme as a
word, and therefore they can understand
-
it.
But in addition to those semantic
-
constraints, you also have to have
physical production constraints.
-
You have to say it loud enough.
If the pizza shop is really noisy, then
-
you have to speak pretty loudly to get the
person behind the counter, to understand
-
what you're saying.
You also have to put the words in the
-
right order.
If, instead of saying, gimme a pepperoni
-
pizza, you said,
Pizza a gimme pepperoni,
-
they might not understand at all what
you're saying.
-
So there are structural combination rules
that you have to follow as well.
-
And there are also etiquette rules. In
some pizza places if you just said,
-
Gimme pepperoni, the waiter might say,
Well, forget it, sir.
-
I don't serve such impolite
people.
-
I certainly would say that to my son if my
son said, Gimme pepperoni.
-
I wouldn't get him a piece.
I'd say, you need to ask me properly.
-
So rules of etiquette can also get in the
way of communication and cooperation.
-
So language operates at all of these
levels.
-
Physical production, semantics, or the
meanings of words, syntax, or the rules of
-
grammar, and etiquette.
Now all of this might seem obvious to you.
-
And it probably should be obvious to you.
But the rules of language are not always
-
obvious.
And that's what we're going to be learning
-
throughout this course.
I'll start with a simple example.
-
What's this?
Well, that is a finger.
-
Okay.
But what's this?
-
Aaaah.
That is a singer.
-
This is not a finger.
That's not a singer.
-
Why do we pronounce the word finger with a
hard G and the word singer with a soft G?
-
That's a rule that we all follow, but very
few people know the rule behind that
-
pronunciation.
So, do you know the rule?
-
Take a little while and think about it.
.
-
Have you got it yet?
Okay, I'll tell you the answer.
-
When a word ends in N, G, E, R, and it's
derived from a verb that ends in NG, then
-
you get a soft G, like singer.
But when the word that ends in N, G, E, R,
-
is not derived from a verb that ends in
NG, then you get either a hard G, like
-
finger,
Or a kind of medium G like plunger or
-
danger.
Now when you get that medium G or that
-
hard G that's a trickier question.
And I don't know the answer to that one,
-
which shows that we can all use language
according to rules, without knowing what
-
the rules are.
We don't have to be conscious of the rules
-
at all.
And a lot of what we're going to be doing
-
in this course is looking behind our
language to try to figure out the rules
-
that govern the way we use language,
especially when we're making arguments in
-
order to better understand what we're
doing.
-
Some of the answers we give will be
obvious once you mention them.
-
But, I bet you hadn't thought of him
before.